Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueVið DjúpumýrarData current as of October 15, 2026

KÍ vs EB - Streymur: match statistics

KÍ crest
KÍ
3 : 0half-time 1:0
EB - Streymur crest
EB - Streymur

KÍ vs EB - Streymur: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KÍ played against EB - Streymur in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on August 31, 2026. Venue: Við Djúpumýrar. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

KÍ has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. EB - Streymur has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

KÍ scores 1.95 goals per game and allows 0.95. EB - Streymur scores 1.25 and allows 1.60. Games in this league average 2.85 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of KÍ's games and 65% of EB - Streymur's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 55%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.36 per game. KÍ takes 15.4 shots per game, while EB - Streymur takes 11.2.

First-half and second-half trends

KÍ leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.90 goals per game after halftime. EB - Streymur leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.55 after halftime.

When the teams score

KÍ's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For EB - Streymur, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.85 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KÍ sit second in the table with a record of 10 wins, 8 draws and just 2 defeats, while EB - Streymur are 7th after 5 wins and 10 losses. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average of 1.63 xG and concede just 0.9 goals per match, whereas away from home the visitors allow opponents 2.02 xG and concede an average of 2 goals. EB - Streymur can be dangerous going forward, scoring 1.67 goals per away match and failing to score in only 11% of their games, but they have not kept a single clean sheet. KÍ’s last five matches have been weaker, with 1 win and a 6:12 goal record, but their superior season-long quality, average home possession of 59%, and clearly more stable defense all favor the hosts. The odds on a KÍ win are the most justified, although the open style of play and the hosts’ recent defensive dip give the visitors a realistic chance of scoring.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - Yes is EB - Streymur’s very weak defense, which has kept no clean sheets and concedes an average of 2.00 goals per match. The visitors are simultaneously scoring an average of 1.67 goals, while KÍ have conceded as many as 12 goals in their last five matches, or 2.40 per game. The current quality of both sides’ chances also favors goals: their average xG from the last five matches stands at 1.65 for KÍ and 1.68 for EB - Streymur. BTTS - Yes has landed in 89% of the visitors’ matches and in 80% of their last five fixtures, clearly above the league average of 54%. The risk lies in KÍ’s lower attacking efficiency: they average 0.91 goals per match this season and have failed to score in 36% of their games. However, the opponent’s defensive weakness significantly reduces the importance of this negative signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The signal for at least two goals is very clear: the 1.5-goal line was surpassed in 82% of KÍ matches and 89% of EB - Streymur fixtures. EB - Streymur have kept no clean sheets, conceding an average of 2.00 goals per match, while KÍ have allowed opponents as many as 2.40 goals per game across their last five outings. Both teams also create enough chances, with average xG figures of 1.28 for KÍ and 1.44 for the visitors, rising to 1.65 and 1.68 respectively over the last five matches. Recent form supports a higher-scoring outcome, as KÍ matches averaged 3.60 goals and EB - Streymur fixtures 3.80 goals during this period. Over 1.5 has an edge over the higher lines, as 3.5 goals was not exceeded in 91% of KÍ's matches this season, despite the current defensive data increasing the chances of a result above 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an EB - Streymur win at full-time, as KÍ were level at the break in 64% of their matches, compared with 33% for the visitors. EB - Streymur average 1.00 goals before half-time, compared with KÍ’s 0.45, and led after 45 minutes in 44% of matches, versus 27% for the hosts. The visitors also have a higher average xG, 1.44 compared with 1.28, register more shots on target, 4.22 to 3.64, and convert their attempts more efficiently: 14% versus 9%. After the break, KÍ concede an average of 0.91 goals, while EB - Streymur score 0.67, and in their last five matches the hosts have conceded as many as 1.8 goals after half-time. The visitors’ defense remains vulnerable, as they have kept no clean sheets in any match this season. Therefore, a draw at half-time is more likely than an early lead for the visitors, but their attacking advantage favors a later turnaround in the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

71Possession (%)29
KÍEB - Streymur
11Shots9
KÍEB - Streymur
4Shots on target5
KÍEB - Streymur
1.57xG1.35
KÍEB - Streymur
7Corners1
KÍEB - Streymur
79Dangerous attacks59
KÍEB - Streymur
13Fouls18
KÍEB - Streymur
1Cards5
KÍEB - Streymur

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.95Goals scored / game1.25
KÍEB - Streymur
0.95Goals allowed / game1.6
KÍEB - Streymur
60%Average possession36%
KÍEB - Streymur
5.4Shots on target / game3.9
KÍEB - Streymur

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.4Shots per game11.15
KÍEB - Streymur
5.4Shots on target3.9
KÍEB - Streymur
12.7%Shot conversion11.2%
KÍEB - Streymur
60%Possession36%
KÍEB - Streymur
1.93xG for1.36
KÍEB - Streymur
1.1xG against1.91
KÍEB - Streymur

Shooting quality

KÍ: DominantEB - Streymur: Balanced
KÍEB - Streymur
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KÍ is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - KÍ · 1.2 pts / game - EB - Streymur

KÍ
DWLWD
Season result split
50% W40% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-8-2
1.90 pts / game · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.79Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
EB - Streymur
WLLLW
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-10
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.00Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 56% better for: goals scored per game.

1.95 goals / game - KÍ · 1.25 goals / game - EB - Streymur

KÍ is 68% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.95 goals / game - KÍ · 1.6 goals / game - EB - Streymur

KÍ scoring profile: very strong

KÍ scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while EB - Streymur keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 games).

EB - Streymur scoring profile: very strong

EB - Streymur scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 games).

39Goals scored (season)25
KÍEB - Streymur
19Goals conceded (season)32
KÍEB - Streymur
2.9Average goals per game2.85
KÍEB - Streymur
8Goals scored (last 5)9
KÍEB - Streymur
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
KÍEB - Streymur

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
KÍEB - Streymur
55%2 goals40%
KÍEB - Streymur
25%3 goals5%
KÍEB - Streymur
25%4 goals5%
KÍEB - Streymur

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal85%
KÍEB - Streymur
20%2 goals50%
KÍEB - Streymur
5%3 goals20%
KÍEB - Streymur
0%4 goals5%
KÍEB - Streymur

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time15%
KÍEB - Streymur
5%BTTS in both halves0%
KÍEB - Streymur
30%Scored in both halves10%
KÍEB - Streymur

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KÍEB - Streymur
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
KÍEB - Streymur
40%BTTS - last 580%
KÍEB - Streymur

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
KÍEB - Streymur
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
KÍEB - Streymur
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
KÍEB - Streymur

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
KÍEB - Streymur
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
KÍEB - Streymur
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
KÍEB - Streymur

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / game - KÍ · 1.55 pts / game - EB - Streymur

KÍ - half-time state
50% leading35% draw15% trailing
EB - Streymur - half-time state
35% leading50% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per game (1st half)1.55
KÍEB - Streymur
1.05Goals scored (1st half)0.7
KÍEB - Streymur
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
KÍEB - Streymur
1.45Average goals (1st half)1.2
KÍEB - Streymur
65%Clean sheet before half-time70%
KÍEB - Streymur
40%No goal before half-time55%
KÍEB - Streymur

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per game (2nd half)0.65
KÍEB - Streymur
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
KÍEB - Streymur
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)1.1
KÍEB - Streymur
1.45Average goals (2nd half)1.65
KÍEB - Streymur
55%Clean sheet after half-time25%
KÍEB - Streymur
55%No goal after half-time60%
KÍEB - Streymur

KÍ - second-half results

35% W40% D25% L
37
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

EB - Streymur - second-half results

15% W20% D65% L
31
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding71%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KÍ - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
EB - Streymur - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.62.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KÍ
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
1
16-30
9
3
31-45
8
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

EB - Streymur
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
5
4
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
5
46-60
3
6
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KÍ

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

EB - Streymur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

KÍLigaEB - Streymur
Average goals per game• 2.902.85• 2.85
Both teams scored▲ 60%56%▲ 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 45%53%▲ 55%
Clean sheets▲ 30%27%▼ 15%
Goal before half-time▲ 75%67%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 70%78%▲ 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.32
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. EB - StreymurYellow cardMikkjal Hellisá
  2. EB - StreymurYellow cardKristian Svabo Eliasen
  3. KÍYellow cardHallur Hansson
  4. EB - StreymurYellow cardMeinhard Debes Geyti
  5. EB - StreymurYellow cardVirgar Jónsson
  6. EB - StreymurSubstitutionOn: Gutti Dahl-OlsenOff: Jákup Hummeland
  7. EB - StreymurSubstitutionOn: Marius NielsenOff: Ba Lamin Sowa
  8. KÍSubstitutionOn: Jonn JohannesenOff: Deni Pavlović
  9. KÍSubstitutionOn: Gilli RólantssonOff: Oussama Ali
  10. EB - StreymurSubstitutionOn: Fríði HolmOff: Kristian Svabo Eliasen
  11. KÍSubstitutionOn: Dávid ReynheimOff: Filip Brattbakk
  12. EB - StreymurYellow cardAndras Olsen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from KÍ's perspective: 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against EB - Streymur. Games average 3.40 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

KÍ
2 : 1
EB - Streymur
EB - Streymur
0 : 0
KÍ
EB - Streymur
0 : 3
KÍ Klaksvík
KÍ Klaksvík
6 : 2
EB - Streymur
KÍ Klaksvík
2 : 1
EB - Streymur

FAQ

What was the result of KÍ vs EB - Streymur?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 3:0 EB - Streymur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KÍ and EB - Streymur?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches KÍ won 4, EB - Streymur won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs EB - Streymur?

KÍ score 1.95 goals per game on average and EB - Streymur 1.25. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 60% of KÍ's matches and 65% of EB - Streymur's.

What form are KÍ and EB - Streymur in?

Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and EB - Streymur 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs EB - Streymur?

The statistical background for KÍ vs EB - Streymur — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.