Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueVið DjúpumýrarData current as of September 20, 2026

KÍ vs HB: match statistics

KÍ crest
0 : 2half-time 0:1
HB crest
HB

KÍ vs HB: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KÍ played against HB in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The game was played on August 10, 2026. Venue: Við Djúpumýrar. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

KÍ has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. HB has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

KÍ scores 1.94 goals per game and allows 0.71. HB scores 1.82 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.84 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 59% of KÍ's games and 71% of HB's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 71%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KÍ has the higher season xG average, 1.94 to 1.77 per game. KÍ takes 15.4 shots per game, while HB takes 14.5.

First-half and second-half trends

KÍ leads at halftime in 53% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. HB leads at halftime in 41% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

KÍ's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For HB, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Faroe Islands Premier League games average 2.84 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KÍ sit top of the table and have suffered just 1 defeat in 17 matches this season, while HB are fifth and have lost 6 games. The hosts win 63% of their home matches and concede just 0.63 goals per game, significantly fewer than HB away from home, where they allow opponents an average of 1.44 goals. However, HB create plenty of chances on the road: their xG stands at 1.86 compared with KÍ’s 1.54, while their average of 6.11 shots on target is considerably higher than the hosts’ 3.63. KÍ’s advantage comes from better defensive organization and more consistent form, highlighted by just 3 goals conceded in their last 5 matches, compared with HB’s 8. The visitors should pose a threat in front of goal, but the league leaders have the greater chance of securing a controlled, most likely one-goal victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS scenario is supported by both teams’ strong season figures: KÍ has recorded it in 63% of matches, while HB has done so in as many as 78%, compared with the league average of 55%. HB has not finished a single league match without scoring, and its average of 1.78 goals and xG of 1.86 indicate significant potential against the KÍ defense, which allows an average of 1.43 xG. KÍ also has solid attacking arguments, averaging 1.88 goals, 5.63 shots on target per match and an xG of 1.68, while HB concedes an average of 1.44 goals. Although KÍ’s last five matches produced only 40% BTTS and just 0.6 goals conceded per game, HB scored 2.2 goals per match during this period. KÍ’s current defensive advantage lowers confidence in the pick, but HB’s scoring consistency and the attacking numbers of both sides provide stronger support for a goal from each team — BTTS - Yes / Goal-Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The attacking profiles of both teams clearly support a goals-based scenario: KÍ score an average of 1.88 goals, while HB average 1.78 goals per match. HB have particularly strong chance-creation numbers, with an average xG of 1.86 and 6.11 shots on target, while KÍ’s defense allows an xG of 1.43. The hosts should also create chances, as their xG stands at 1.68, while HB concede an average of 1.44 goals and allow an xG of 1.29. At least two goals were scored in 88% of KÍ matches and 89% of HB matches, making Over 1.5 a significantly safer choice than the more demanding 2.5 line. KÍ’s last five matches were admittedly more defensive, averaging only 1.8 total goals, but HB played games averaging 3.8 goals during the same period, maintaining a high probability of at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a KÍ win, as the hosts were level at the break in 3 of their 8 matches this season, and in as many as 60% of their last five games. HB have slightly higher average xG across the season, 1.86 compared with 1.68, but KÍ have shown significantly better current defensive form: over their last five matches, they have conceded an average of just 0.6 goals, compared with HB’s 1.6. After half-time, KÍ score an average of 1.13 goals and concede 0.63, while HB score 0.89 and allow opponents 1.11 goals. The hosts have also collected 13 second-half points, compared with HB’s 9, indicating a greater ability to turn an even match in their favor after the interval. Home advantage and KÍ’s run of 3 wins in their last 5 matches further strengthen the X/1 scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

68Possession (%)32
HB
18Shots4
HB
1Shots on target2
HB
1.86xG0.8
HB
7Corners1
HB
88Dangerous attacks53
HB
9Fouls7
HB
0Cards0
HB

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.94Goals scored / game1.82
HB
0.71Goals allowed / game1.41
HB
60%Average possession55%
HB
5.41Shots on target / game5.88
HB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.41Shots per game14.53
HB
5.41Shots on target5.88
HB
12.6%Shot conversion12.6%
HB
60%Possession55%
HB
1.94xG for1.77
HB
1.08xG against1.36
HB

Shooting quality

: DominantHB: Dominant
HB
Accuracy (shots on target)35%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

HB is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - KÍ · 2.4 pts / game - HB

WDLDW
Season result split
53% W41% D6% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.97Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
HB
LWWWW
Season result split
47% W18% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-6
1.59 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 7% better for: goals scored per game.

1.94 goals / game - KÍ · 1.82 goals / game - HB

KÍ is 99% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.71 goals / game - KÍ · 1.41 goals / game - HB

KÍ scoring profile: very strong

KÍ scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 games), while HB keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 games).

HB scoring profile: very strong

HB scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 games), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 games).

33Goals scored (season)31
HB
12Goals conceded (season)24
HB
2.65Average goals per game3.24
HB
8Goals scored (last 5)15
HB
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
HB

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal88%
HB
53%2 goals53%
HB
24%3 goals29%
HB
24%4 goals12%
HB

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal76%
HB
6%2 goals41%
HB
0%3 goals18%
HB
0%4 goals6%
HB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time12%
HB
0%BTTS in both halves6%
HB
29%Scored in both halves29%
HB

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
HB
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
HB
40%BTTS - last 580%
HB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
HB
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
HB
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
HB

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
HB
24%Min. 2 goals after half-time59%
HB
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time41%
HB

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.94 pts / game - KÍ · 1.59 pts / game - HB

KÍ - half-time state
53% leading35% draw12% trailing
HB - half-time state
41% leading35% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.94Points per game (1st half)1.59
HB
1.12Goals scored (1st half)0.82
HB
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
HB
1.47Average goals (1st half)1.35
HB
71%Clean sheet before half-time65%
HB
35%No goal before half-time47%
HB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.59Points per game (2nd half)1.29
HB
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)1
HB
0.35Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
HB
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.88
HB
65%Clean sheet after half-time29%
HB
59%No goal after half-time35%
HB

KÍ - second-half results

41% W35% D24% L
33
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 53% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

HB - second-half results

29% W41% D29% L
27
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KÍ - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.60.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
HB - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.00
Goals scored / game1.41.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+6+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
7
1
16-30
9
2
31-45
7
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

HB
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
5
3
16-30
4
2
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
6
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.94
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
53%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

HB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.41
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.81
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

LigaHB
Average goals per game 2.652.84 3.24
Both teams scored 59%56% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%53% 71%
Clean sheets 35%27% 24%
Goal before half-time 76%69% 76%
Goal after half-time 65%78% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / game
1.33
Away goals / game
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from 's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against HB. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.

HB
0 : 2
KÍ Klaksvík
0 : 0
HB Tórshavn
HB Tórshavn
1 : 1
KÍ Klaksvík
KÍ Klaksvík
4 : 0
HB Tórshavn

FAQ

What was the result of KÍ vs HB?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 0:2 HB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KÍ and HB?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KÍ won 2, HB won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs HB?

KÍ score 1.94 goals per game on average and HB 1.82. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of KÍ's matches and 71% of HB's.

What form are KÍ and HB in?

Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and HB 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs HB?

The statistical background for KÍ vs HB — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.