Faroe Islands - Faroe Islands Premier LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

KÍ vs NSÍ: match statistics

KÍ crest
1 : 1half-time 1:0
NSÍ crest
NSÍ
165%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

KÍ displays outstanding form with five consecutive wins in their recent matches, scoring an impressive 18 goals with only 3 conceded. The hosts sit in second place in the table and have not experienced a defeat or a draw yet this season. NSÍ, despite winning their only match of the season, shows instability over their last five games with a 3-0-2 record and a 10:9 goal ratio. The hosts have a distinct advantage in offensive efficiency and defensive stability. Considering KÍ's excellent streak and the visitors' weaker form, a home win is the most probable scenario.

KÍ vs NSÍ: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KÍ play NSÍ in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The match date is 15 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

KÍ: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. NSÍ: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KÍ scores 1.94 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. NSÍ scores 1.88 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KÍ 63%, NSÍ 50%. Over 2.5: KÍ 44%, NSÍ 50%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

KÍ has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.67. KÍ: 15.7 shots per match, NSÍ: 13.1.

Match halves

KÍ: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.81. NSÍ: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.13.

Goals by minute

KÍ: 31-45+ (9 goals). NSÍ: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Faroe Islands Premier League: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 3-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 75%.

Match description

KÍ displays outstanding form with five consecutive wins in their recent matches, scoring an impressive 18 goals with only 3 conceded. The hosts sit in second place in the table and have not experienced a defeat or a draw yet this season. NSÍ, despite winning their only match of the season, shows instability over their last five games with a 3-0-2 record and a 10:9 goal ratio. The hosts have a distinct advantage in offensive efficiency and defensive stability. Considering KÍ's excellent streak and the visitors' weaker form, a home win is the most probable scenario.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
NSÍ
6Shots12
NSÍ
3Shots on target2
NSÍ
1.09xG1.36
NSÍ
4Corners3
NSÍ
67Dangerous attacks64
NSÍ
13Fouls11
NSÍ
4Cards4
NSÍ

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.94Goals scored / match1.88
NSÍ
0.75Goals conceded / match1
NSÍ
61%Average possession52%
NSÍ
5.56Shots on target / match4.75
NSÍ

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.69Shots per match13.13
NSÍ
5.56Shots on target4.75
NSÍ
12.4%Shot conversion14.3%
NSÍ
61%Possession52%
NSÍ
1.94xG for1.67
NSÍ
1.08xG against1.4
NSÍ

Shooting quality

: DominantNSÍ: Efficient finishing
NSÍ
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

WWDLD
Season result split
50% W44% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-1
1.94 pts / match · goal difference +19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.90Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
NSÍ
LWWDD
Season result split
63% W25% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-2
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KÍ is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - KÍ · 1 goals / match - NSÍ

KÍ scoring profile: strong

KÍ scores in 75% of matches (12 of 16 matches), while NSÍ keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 matches).

NSÍ scoring profile: very strong

NSÍ scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

31Goals scored (season)30
NSÍ
12Goals conceded (season)16
NSÍ
2.69Average goals in match2.88
NSÍ
8Goals scored (last 5)9
NSÍ
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
NSÍ

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal88%
NSÍ
50%2 goals56%
NSÍ
25%3 goals25%
NSÍ
25%4 goals6%
NSÍ

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal56%
NSÍ
6%2 goals25%
NSÍ
0%3 goals19%
NSÍ
0%4 goals0%
NSÍ

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time38%
NSÍ
0%BTTS in both halves13%
NSÍ
25%Scored in both halves50%
NSÍ

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
NSÍ
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
NSÍ
60%BTTS - last 540%
NSÍ

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
NSÍ
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
NSÍ
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
NSÍ

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
NSÍ
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
NSÍ
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
NSÍ

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KÍ is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.88 pts / match - KÍ · 1.38 pts / match - NSÍ

KÍ - half-time state
50% leading38% draw13% trailing
NSÍ - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.88Points per match (1st half)1.38
NSÍ
1.13Goals scored (1st half)0.75
NSÍ
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
NSÍ
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.31
NSÍ
69%Clean sheet before half-time56%
NSÍ
38%No goal before half-time44%
NSÍ

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)2.13
NSÍ
0.81Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
NSÍ
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
NSÍ
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.56
NSÍ
63%Clean sheet after half-time75%
NSÍ
63%No goal after half-time19%
NSÍ

KÍ - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

NSÍ - second-half results

63% W25% R13% P
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding252%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KÍ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
NSÍ - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
7
1
16-30
9
2
31-45
6
2
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

NSÍ
ScoredConceded
6
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
2
4
31-45
9
2
46-60
5
3
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.86
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

NSÍ

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).

Teams vs league

LigaNSÍ
Average goals in match 2.692.80 2.88
Both teams scored 63%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%51% 50%
Clean sheets 31%28% 44%
Goal before half-time 75%69% 63%
Goal after half-time 63%78% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): 3 - 1 - 0 NSÍ. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.

NSÍ
0 : 0
NSÍ Runavík
2 : 4
KÍ Klaksvík
KÍ Klaksvík
3 : 2
NSÍ Runavík
NSÍ Runavík
1 : 2
KÍ Klaksvík

FAQ

What was the result of KÍ vs NSÍ?

The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished KÍ 1:1 NSÍ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KÍ and NSÍ?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KÍ won 3, NSÍ won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KÍ vs NSÍ?

KÍ score 1.94 goals per game on average and NSÍ 1.88. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 63% of KÍ's matches and 50% of NSÍ's.

What form are KÍ and NSÍ in?

Over the last 5 games KÍ have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and NSÍ 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KÍ vs NSÍ?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.