Kitara vs SC Villa: match statistics
Kitara vs SC Villa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kitara played against SC Villa in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on April 30, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Kitara has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. SC Villa has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Kitara scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 0.58. SC Villa scores 1.46 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 2.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Kitara's games and 33% of SC Villa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 33%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kitara has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.43 per game. Kitara takes 10.9 shots per game, while SC Villa takes 10.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Kitara leads at halftime in 63% of its games and scores 0.46 goals per game after halftime. SC Villa leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.79 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kitara's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (12 goals). For SC Villa, it is minutes 0-15 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.09 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Kitara wins 73% of home matches, averages 1.91 goals scored and concedes only 0.45 goals per game, records 64% clean sheets and home xG 1.64 versus xG against 1.29. SC Villa averages 1.00 goal on the road, registers 2.73 shots on target per away match and has 27% of away games without scoring, with away xG 1.35. In the last 5 matches Villa has won 4 of 5 and scored 8 goals (2.6 points per game), while Kitara has scored 5 goals and averaged 1.6 points per game in their last 5, giving the visitors a form edge. However, given Kitara’s clear home efficiency (16% conversion at home vs 10% for away and a low FTS rate 9% vs 27%), the hosts have the greater probability, though a draw or a Villa win remain possible.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In my assessment the more likely scenario is 'No' (Both Teams To Score - No). Kitara’s season BTTS rate is 38%, SC Villa’s is 27%, and the league average BTTS is only 39%. A strong argument against BTTS is the high rate of clean sheets: Kitara has 62% clean sheets at home, SC Villa 55% away, and the league clean sheet rate reaches 76%. Additionally, both teams concede very few goals (Kitara 0.38 at home, SC Villa 0.64 away) and BTTS occurred in only 20% of the last 5 matches for both sides; in that period Kitara averaged 1.0 goals scored and 0.4 conceded, while SC Villa averaged 1.6 scored and 0.2 conceded. Looking at chance creation, Kitara has 1.5 xG, 4.58 shots on target and 17% conversion, whereas SC Villa has 1.35 xG, 2.73 shots on target and 10% conversion, which suggests that more often only one side finds the net. Considering the low season and recent BTTS rates and the prevailing clean sheets, I assess probability at 75% for 'No' and 25% for 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model based on xG and shot balance estimates the total goals at around 2.67 (1.42 for Kitara vs 1.25 for SC Villa): home xG 1.50 versus away 1.35, with xG against 1.15 vs 1.33. Kitara averages 4.58 shots on target and has a conversion rate of 17%, while SC Villa has 2.73 shots on target and a 10% conversion, which increases the likelihood of a home goal. Seasonally Kitara’s matches finished Over 1.5 goals in 62% of cases, and SC Villa in 45%, while the Over 2.5 percentages are 38% and 27% — hence a weaker signal for Over 2.5. A Poisson simulation with lambda=2.67 gives ~75% probability for Over 1.5, ~50% for Over 2.5 and ~28% for Over 3.5. Based on this, the best and strongest betting signal is Over 1.5 (back Over, line 1.5).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics indicate a clear advantage for Kitara: the hosts average 1.85 goals per match versus 1.00 for SC Villa and concede only 0.38 goals per match compared to 0.64 for their opponents; their xG is 1.50 versus 1.35 for the visitors, and shot conversion is 17% with an average of 4.58 shots on target compared to 10% and 2.73 for the opponents. At Half-Time Kitara score on average 0.75 goals and concede only 0.08, leading at the break in 42% of matches and keeping a clean sheet at Half-Time in 92% of games. In Second Halves the hosts also dominate — averaging 1.42 goals in the second half and winning 67% of those periods versus 0.73 goals and 18% for SC Villa — so a draw or a slim lead at the break frequently turns into a Kitara victory. Although SC Villa are in good form (80% wins in their last 5 matches versus 40% for the hosts), the home advantage in goals at the break, efficiency and xG makes the most likely scenario a Kitara lead at Half-Time and a home win after 90 minutes (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kitara | SC Villa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
SC Villa is 63% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Kitara · 2.6 pts / game - SC Villa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
SC Villa is 6% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - Kitara · 1.46 goals / game - SC Villa
SC Villa is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.58 goals / game - Kitara · 0.5 goals / game - SC Villa
Kitara scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 games), while SC Villa keeps a clean sheet in 58% (14 of 24 games).
SC Villa scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 games), while Kitara keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kitara
Over / Under - SC Villa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kitara is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.13 pts / game - Kitara · 1.54 pts / game - SC Villa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kitara - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 63% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
SC Villa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 58%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kitara
SC Villa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kitara | Liga | SC Villa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.96 | 2.09 | ▼ 1.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 39% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 35% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 60% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 54% | 60% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KitaraGoalPatrick Kaddu
Head-to-head
Record from Kitara's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against SC Villa. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kitara vs SC Villa?
The Uganda Premier League match finished Kitara 2:0 SC Villa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kitara vs SC Villa?
Kitara score 1.38 goals per game on average and SC Villa 1.46. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kitara's matches and 33% of SC Villa's.
What form are Kitara and SC Villa in?
Over the last 5 games Kitara have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and SC Villa 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitara vs SC Villa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kitara vs SC Villa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


