Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 19 July 2026

Kitayosce vs KMC: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
3 : 0half-time 3:0
KMC crest
KMC
170%(2.27)
X20%(2.48)
210%(3.77)

Kitayosce clearly outperforms KMC in terms of form and home statistics. The hosts remain unbeaten in home matches (67% draws, 33% wins), while keeping a clean sheet in 67% of matches and conceding an average of just 0.67 goals per game. KMC presents catastrophic away form – they have lost all of their last four away matches and have not achieved any victory this season away from home (100% losses). The visitors have scored barely 0.25 goals on average per away match with 75% of matches without scoring a goal, which, given Kitayosce's solid defense, gives the hosts a huge advantage. The difference in goal difference (+1 for Kitayosce in home matches vs -8 for KMC in away matches) and the form of the last five matches (1.4 PPG vs 0.2 PPG) unequivocally point to a home victory.

Kitayosce vs KMC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitayosce play KMC in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 23 January 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. KMC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. KMC scores 0.57 and concedes 1.75. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitayosce 33%, KMC 32%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 40%, KMC 39%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.21. Kitayosce: 6.2 shots per match, KMC: 6.6.

Match halves

Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47. KMC: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.29.

Goals by minute

Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). KMC: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kitayosce clearly outperforms KMC in terms of form and home statistics. The hosts remain unbeaten in home matches (67% draws, 33% wins), while keeping a clean sheet in 67% of matches and conceding an average of just 0.67 goals per game. KMC presents catastrophic away form – they have lost all of their last four away matches and have not achieved any victory this season away from home (100% losses). The visitors have scored barely 0.25 goals on average per away match with 75% of matches without scoring a goal, which, given Kitayosce's solid defense, gives the hosts a huge advantage. The difference in goal difference (+1 for Kitayosce in home matches vs -8 for KMC in away matches) and the form of the last five matches (1.4 PPG vs 0.2 PPG) unequivocally point to a home victory.

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
KitayosceKMC
12Shots7
KitayosceKMC
2Shots on target2
KitayosceKMC
1.27xG0.96
KitayosceKMC
5Corners3
KitayosceKMC
53Dangerous attacks52
KitayosceKMC
-1Fouls-1
KitayosceKMC
-1Cards-1
KitayosceKMC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.1Goals scored / match0.57
KitayosceKMC
0.93Goals conceded / match1.75
KitayosceKMC
42%Average possession44%
KitayosceKMC
2.27Shots on target / match2.46
KitayosceKMC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.23Shots per match6.64
KitayosceKMC
2.27Shots on target2.46
KitayosceKMC
17.6%Shot conversion8.6%
KitayosceKMC
42%Possession44%
KitayosceKMC
1.25xG for1.21
KitayosceKMC
1.3xG against1.57
KitayosceKMC

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: Counter-attackingKMC: Balanced
KitayosceKMC
Accuracy (shots on target)36%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kitayosce
WDDLD
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-9
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
KMC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W11% R82% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-23
0.32 pts / match · goal difference -33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-14
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 93% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.57 goals / match - KMC

Kitayosce is 88% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce · 1.75 goals / match - KMC

Kitayosce scoring profile: very strong

Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 matches).

KMC scoring profile: more difficult

KMC scores in 39% of matches (11 of 28 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

33Goals scored (season)16
KitayosceKMC
28Goals conceded (season)49
KitayosceKMC
2.03Average goals in match2.32
KitayosceKMC
2Goals scored (last 5)3
KitayosceKMC
4Goals conceded (last 5)10
KitayosceKMC

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal39%
KitayosceKMC
30%2 goals14%
KitayosceKMC
17%3 goals4%
KitayosceKMC
7%4 goals0%
KitayosceKMC

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal89%
KitayosceKMC
27%2 goals43%
KitayosceKMC
10%3 goals36%
KitayosceKMC
0%4 goals7%
KitayosceKMC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time18%
KitayosceKMC
0%BTTS in both halves7%
KitayosceKMC
13%Scored in both halves11%
KitayosceKMC

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
KitayosceKMC
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
KitayosceKMC
20%BTTS - last 540%
KitayosceKMC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
KitayosceKMC
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
KitayosceKMC
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KitayosceKMC

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
KitayosceKMC
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
KitayosceKMC
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
KitayosceKMC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 51% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce · 0.75 pts / match - KMC

Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing
KMC - half-time state
11% leading43% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)0.75
KitayosceKMC
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.29
KitayosceKMC
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.93
KitayosceKMC
1Average goals (1st half)1.21
KitayosceKMC
60%Clean sheet before half-time43%
KitayosceKMC
67%No goal before half-time71%
KitayosceKMC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)0.68
KitayosceKMC
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
KitayosceKMC
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
KitayosceKMC
0.9Average goals (2nd half)1.07
KitayosceKMC
67%Clean sheet after half-time43%
KitayosceKMC
67%No goal after half-time79%
KitayosceKMC

Kitayosce - second-half results

27% W50% R23% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KMC - second-half results

7% W46% R46% P
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding64%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
KMC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
9
0-15
3
8
16-30
5
10
31-45
4
8
46-60
0
7
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-54%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
26%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaKMC
Average goals in match 2.032.17 2.32
Both teams scored 33%35% 32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%39% 39%
Clean sheets 43%39% 11%
Goal before half-time 57%60% 68%
Goal after half-time 57%63% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitayosce 1 - 0 - 0 KMC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs KMC?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 3:0 KMC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs KMC?

Kitayosce score 1.10 goals per game on average and KMC 0.57. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kitayosce's matches and 32% of KMC's.

What form are Kitayosce and KMC in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and KMC 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs KMC?

The statistical background for Kitayosce vs KMC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.