Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 23 July 2026

Kitayosce vs Mbeya City: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Mbeya City crest
Mbeya City
165%(0.00)
X22%(0.00)
213%(0.00)

Kitayosce displays significantly better home form with a 50% win rate and 75% clean sheets at home, which forms a solid foundation for victory. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five home matches (2 wins, 2 draws), while Mbeya City loses as many as 71% of away matches and has only managed one win in their last seven away fixtures. The difference in average goals scored is substantial - Kitayosce averages 1.5 goals at home, while Mbeya City only 0.71 away, with the visitors failing to score in 57% of their away matches. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.45 vs 1.11), and the goal difference confirms Kitayosce's advantage (+4 at home compared to Mbeya City's -5 away). Taking all these factors into account, a home win is the most likely scenario for this match.

Kitayosce vs Mbeya City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kitayosce play Mbeya City in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 7 February 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Mbeya City: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Mbeya City scores 0.78 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kitayosce 33%, Mbeya City 31%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 40%, Mbeya City 28%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Kitayosce has higher xG: 1.25 vs 0.99. Kitayosce: 6.2 shots per match, Mbeya City: 4.7.

Match halves

Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47. Mbeya City: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.28.

Goals by minute

Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). Mbeya City: 16-30 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kitayosce displays significantly better home form with a 50% win rate and 75% clean sheets at home, which forms a solid foundation for victory. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five home matches (2 wins, 2 draws), while Mbeya City loses as many as 71% of away matches and has only managed one win in their last seven away fixtures. The difference in average goals scored is substantial - Kitayosce averages 1.5 goals at home, while Mbeya City only 0.71 away, with the visitors failing to score in 57% of their away matches. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.45 vs 1.11), and the goal difference confirms Kitayosce's advantage (+4 at home compared to Mbeya City's -5 away). Taking all these factors into account, a home win is the most likely scenario for this match.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
KitayosceMbeya City
3Shots8
KitayosceMbeya City
0Shots on target2
KitayosceMbeya City
0.75xG1.42
KitayosceMbeya City
3Corners2
KitayosceMbeya City
75Dangerous attacks104
KitayosceMbeya City
-1Fouls-1
KitayosceMbeya City
-1Cards-1
KitayosceMbeya City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KitayosceMbeya City
1.1Goals scored / match0.78
KitayosceMbeya City
0.93Goals conceded / match1.28
KitayosceMbeya City
42%Average possession41%
KitayosceMbeya City
2.27Shots on target / match1.34
KitayosceMbeya City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.23Shots per match4.66
KitayosceMbeya City
2.27Shots on target1.34
KitayosceMbeya City
17.6%Shot conversion16.8%
KitayosceMbeya City
42%Possession41%
KitayosceMbeya City
1.25xG for0.99
KitayosceMbeya City
1.3xG against1.35
KitayosceMbeya City

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: Counter-attackingMbeya City: Counter-attacking
KitayosceMbeya City
Accuracy (shots on target)36%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.58

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Mbeya City is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce · 1.8 pts / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce
WDDLD
Season result split
37% W33% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-9
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Mbeya City
WDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W31% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-10-14
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-8
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - Kitayosce · 0.78 goals / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce · 1.28 goals / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce scoring profile: mixed

Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 34% (11 of 32 matches).

Mbeya City scoring profile: mixed

Mbeya City scores in 50% of matches (16 of 32 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

33Goals scored (season)25
KitayosceMbeya City
28Goals conceded (season)41
KitayosceMbeya City
2.03Average goals in match2.06
KitayosceMbeya City
2Goals scored (last 5)5
KitayosceMbeya City
4Goals conceded (last 5)1
KitayosceMbeya City

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal50%
KitayosceMbeya City
30%2 goals22%
KitayosceMbeya City
17%3 goals6%
KitayosceMbeya City
7%4 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal66%
KitayosceMbeya City
27%2 goals34%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%3 goals13%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%4 goals9%
KitayosceMbeya City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

35%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time25%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KitayosceMbeya City
13%Scored in both halves16%
KitayosceMbeya City

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
KitayosceMbeya City
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
KitayosceMbeya City
20%BTTS - last 520%
KitayosceMbeya City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
KitayosceMbeya City
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
KitayosceMbeya City

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
KitayosceMbeya City
23%Min. 2 goals after half-time16%
KitayosceMbeya City
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
KitayosceMbeya City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Kitayosce · 1.03 pts / match - Mbeya City

Kitayosce - half-time state
20% leading53% draw27% trailing
Mbeya City - half-time state
16% leading56% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.03
KitayosceMbeya City
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.44
KitayosceMbeya City
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.72
KitayosceMbeya City
1Average goals (1st half)1.16
KitayosceMbeya City
60%Clean sheet before half-time50%
KitayosceMbeya City
67%No goal before half-time59%
KitayosceMbeya City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.3Points per match (2nd half)1
KitayosceMbeya City
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.28
KitayosceMbeya City
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
KitayosceMbeya City
0.9Average goals (2nd half)0.84
KitayosceMbeya City
67%Clean sheet after half-time59%
KitayosceMbeya City
67%No goal after half-time78%
KitayosceMbeya City

Kitayosce - second-half results

27% W50% R23% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mbeya City - second-half results

19% W44% R38% P
33
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kitayosce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.40.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mbeya City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.60.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
8
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Mbeya City
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
7
8
16-30
3
11
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
7
61-75
3
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Mbeya City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.74
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaMbeya City
Average goals in match 2.032.17 2.06
Both teams scored 33%35% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%39% 28%
Clean sheets 43%39% 34%
Goal before half-time 57%60% 66%
Goal after half-time 57%63% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kitayosce 0 - 1 - 0 Mbeya City. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 0:2 Mbeya City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

Kitayosce score 1.10 goals per game on average and Mbeya City 0.78. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kitayosce's matches and 31% of Mbeya City's.

What form are Kitayosce and Mbeya City in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Mbeya City 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.