Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of October 17, 2026

Kitayosce vs Mbeya City: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Mbeya City crest
Mbeya City
165%(0.00)
X22%(0.00)
213%(0.00)

Kitayosce displays significantly better home form with a 50% win rate and 75% clean sheets at home, which forms a solid foundation for victory. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five home matches (2 wins, 2 draws), while Mbeya City loses as many as 71% of away matches and has only managed one win in their last seven away fixtures. The difference in average goals scored is substantial - Kitayosce averages 1.5 goals at home, while Mbeya City only 0.71 away, with the visitors failing to score in 57% of their away matches. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.45 vs 1.11), and the goal difference confirms Kitayosce's advantage (+4 at home compared to Mbeya City's -5 away). Taking all these factors into account, a home win is the most likely scenario for this match.

Kitayosce vs Mbeya City: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kitayosce played against Mbeya City in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on February 7, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Kitayosce has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Mbeya City has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Kitayosce scores 1.10 goals per game and allows 0.90. Mbeya City scores 0.69 and allows 1.31. Games in this league average 1.76 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of Kitayosce's games and 31% of Mbeya City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 40% and 31%, compared with league averages of 28% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Mbeya City has the higher season xG average, 1.10 to 1.00 per game. Kitayosce takes 5.8 shots per game, while Mbeya City takes 5.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Kitayosce leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Mbeya City leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.23 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kitayosce's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Mbeya City, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.76 goals. Both teams score in 28% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kitayosce displays significantly better home form with a 50% win rate and 75% clean sheets at home, which forms a solid foundation for victory. The hosts are unbeaten in their last five home matches (2 wins, 2 draws), while Mbeya City loses as many as 71% of away matches and has only managed one win in their last seven away fixtures. The difference in average goals scored is substantial - Kitayosce averages 1.5 goals at home, while Mbeya City only 0.71 away, with the visitors failing to score in 57% of their away matches. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.45 vs 1.11), and the goal difference confirms Kitayosce's advantage (+4 at home compared to Mbeya City's -5 away). Taking all these factors into account, a home win is the most likely scenario for this match.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
KitayosceMbeya City
3Shots8
KitayosceMbeya City
0Shots on target2
KitayosceMbeya City
0.75xG1.42
KitayosceMbeya City
3Corners2
KitayosceMbeya City
75Dangerous attacks104
KitayosceMbeya City
-1Fouls-1
KitayosceMbeya City
-1Cards-1
KitayosceMbeya City

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

KitayosceMbeya City
1.1Goals scored / game0.69
KitayosceMbeya City
0.9Goals allowed / game1.31
KitayosceMbeya City
38%Average possession36%
KitayosceMbeya City
1.7Shots on target / game1.77
KitayosceMbeya City

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

5.8Shots per game5.15
KitayosceMbeya City
1.7Shots on target1.77
KitayosceMbeya City
19%Shot conversion13.4%
KitayosceMbeya City
38%Possession36%
KitayosceMbeya City
1xG for1.1
KitayosceMbeya City
1.2xG against1.62
KitayosceMbeya City

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: Counter-attackingMbeya City: Counter-attacking
KitayosceMbeya City
Accuracy (shots on target)29%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.650.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kitayosce is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Kitayosce · 0.4 pts / game - Mbeya City

Kitayosce
LWWLD
Season result split
30% W40% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-3
1.30 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 at home
2-2-0
DDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Mbeya City
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
15% W31% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-7
0.77 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-5
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kitayosce is 59% better for: goals scored per game.

1.1 goals / game - Kitayosce · 0.69 goals / game - Mbeya City

Kitayosce is 46% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.9 goals / game - Kitayosce · 1.31 goals / game - Mbeya City

Kitayosce scoring profile: strong

Kitayosce scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 games), while Mbeya City keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 games).

Mbeya City scoring profile: mixed

Mbeya City scores in 46% of games (6 of 13 games), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 games).

11Goals scored (season)9
KitayosceMbeya City
9Goals conceded (season)17
KitayosceMbeya City
2Average goals per game2
KitayosceMbeya City
8Goals scored (last 5)3
KitayosceMbeya City
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
KitayosceMbeya City

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal46%
KitayosceMbeya City
30%2 goals15%
KitayosceMbeya City
20%3 goals8%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal77%
KitayosceMbeya City
30%2 goals46%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%3 goals8%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%4 goals0%
KitayosceMbeya City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time23%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KitayosceMbeya City
0%Scored in both halves15%
KitayosceMbeya City

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
KitayosceMbeya City
60%BTTS - last 560%
KitayosceMbeya City

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
KitayosceMbeya City
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KitayosceMbeya City

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 2 goals after half-time15%
KitayosceMbeya City
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
KitayosceMbeya City

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kitayosce - half-time state
10% leading70% draw20% trailing
Mbeya City - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1
KitayosceMbeya City
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.46
KitayosceMbeya City
0.3Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
KitayosceMbeya City
0.7Average goals (1st half)1.15
KitayosceMbeya City
70%Clean sheet before half-time46%
KitayosceMbeya City
80%No goal before half-time62%
KitayosceMbeya City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per game (2nd half)0.85
KitayosceMbeya City
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.23
KitayosceMbeya City
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.62
KitayosceMbeya City
0.9Average goals (2nd half)0.85
KitayosceMbeya City
60%Clean sheet after half-time54%
KitayosceMbeya City
70%No goal after half-time77%
KitayosceMbeya City

Kitayosce - second-half results

20% W50% D30% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Mbeya City - second-half results

15% W38% D46% L
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 15%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kitayosce - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.40.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Mbeya City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.60
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game1.20.4
Average goals per game1.80.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals80%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Mbeya City
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
1
4
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
0
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 45% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Mbeya City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaMbeya City
Average goals per game▲ 2.001.76▲ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 40%28%▲ 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 40%26%▲ 31%
Clean sheets▼ 40%44%▼ 23%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%47%▲ 69%
Goal after half-time▲ 60%56%▲ 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.76
Average goals per game
28%
Both teams scored
26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / game
0.56
Away goals / game
+114%
Home attack advantage
+53%
Home defensive advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
47%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
17%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 0:2 Mbeya City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

Kitayosce score 1.10 goals per game on average and Mbeya City 0.69. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Kitayosce's matches and 31% of Mbeya City's.

What form are Kitayosce and Mbeya City in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mbeya City 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Mbeya City?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.