Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji: match statistics
Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kitayosce play Pamba Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 17 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Kitayosce: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Pamba Jiji: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kitayosce scores 1.10 and concedes 0.93 goals per match. Pamba Jiji scores 1.07 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kitayosce 33%, Pamba Jiji 40%. Over 2.5: Kitayosce 40%, Pamba Jiji 50%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Pamba Jiji has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.25. Kitayosce: 6.2 shots per match, Pamba Jiji: 5.3.
Match halves
Kitayosce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47. Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Kitayosce: 0-15 (8 goals). Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
I back the home win (1) — Kitayosce possess a clear defensive edge at home, conceding just 0.44 goals per match and keeping clean sheets in 78% of games, whereas Pamba Jiji concede 1.13 goals on average away and have only a 38% clean sheet rate. Offensively the hosts score 1.11 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.20 and a 12% conversion rate, while the visitors manage only 0.63 goals away with xG 1.08 and a 10% conversion, indicating finishing issues. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 4 goals each, but Kitayosce conceded 3 and recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (averaging 1.6 points per game), whereas Pamba Jiji conceded 6 and had 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 points per game). Although the visitors have higher possession (59% vs 47%) and more shots on target per match (3.67 vs 2.5), their high share of goalless away games (63%) and lower conversion rate make them less threatening going forward. Based on this I estimate probabilities at 60% for a home win, 25% for a draw and 15% for an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kitayosce | Pamba Jiji | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.24 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.48 | 0.49 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kitayosce is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Kitayosce · 0.6 pts / match - Pamba Jiji
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kitayosce is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.93 goals / match - Kitayosce · 1.17 goals / match - Pamba Jiji
Kitayosce scores in 57% of matches (17 of 30 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
Pamba Jiji scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Kitayosce
Over / Under — Pamba Jiji
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kitayosce - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Pamba Jiji - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kitayosce
Pamba Jiji
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Kitayosce | Liga | Pamba Jiji | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.03 | 2.17 | • 2.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 35% | ▲ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 40% | 39% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 39% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 60% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kitayosce 0 - 1 - 0 Pamba Jiji. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 1:0 Pamba Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?
Kitayosce score 1.10 goals per game on average and Pamba Jiji 1.07. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kitayosce's matches and 40% of Pamba Jiji's.
What form are Kitayosce and Pamba Jiji in?
Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Pamba Jiji 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?
The statistical background for Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.