Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of September 09, 2026

Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji: match statistics

Kitayosce crest
Kitayosce
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji

Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kitayosce played against Pamba Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on April 17, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Kitayosce has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Pamba Jiji has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Kitayosce scores 1.06 goals per game and allows 1.00. Pamba Jiji scores 1.06 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 1.97 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 28% of Kitayosce's games and 33% of Pamba Jiji's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 44%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Pamba Jiji has the higher season xG average, 1.23 to 1.02 per game. Kitayosce takes 5.2 shots per game, while Pamba Jiji takes 5.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Kitayosce leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Pamba Jiji leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.39 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kitayosce's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Pamba Jiji, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.97 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1) — Kitayosce possess a clear defensive edge at home, conceding just 0.44 goals per match and keeping clean sheets in 78% of games, whereas Pamba Jiji concede 1.13 goals on average away and have only a 38% clean sheet rate. Offensively the hosts score 1.11 goals per home match with an average xG of 1.20 and a 12% conversion rate, while the visitors manage only 0.63 goals away with xG 1.08 and a 10% conversion, indicating finishing issues. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 4 goals each, but Kitayosce conceded 3 and recorded 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (averaging 1.6 points per game), whereas Pamba Jiji conceded 6 and had 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss (1.2 points per game). Although the visitors have higher possession (59% vs 47%) and more shots on target per match (3.67 vs 2.5), their high share of goalless away games (63%) and lower conversion rate make them less threatening going forward. Based on this I estimate probabilities at 60% for a home win, 25% for a draw and 15% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Kitayosce average 1.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded per match this season, while Pamba Jiji records only 0.63 goals scored and 1.13 conceded per match. Season BTTS rates are 40% for the home side and 25% for the visitors, and the hosts have kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches versus 38% for Pamba, indicating a defensive edge for the home team. In the last 5 matches the hosts had BTTS 0%, scored a total of 4 goals (0.8 avg) and conceded 3 (0.6), while the visitors in their last 5 also scored 4 (0.8) but conceded 6 (1.2) and had 40% BTTS. Looking at xG and shots: hosts xG 1.35 versus xG against Pamba 1.12, and Pamba register more shots on target 3.67 vs 2.88, but with lower conversion 10% vs 20% for the hosts, which suggests the visitors create chances but fail to convert. Overall I assess 'BTTS - No' as more likely (70%) than 'Yes' (30%), due to the hosts' 0% BTTS in the last 5, the visitors' low scoring average of 0.63 and the hosts' 50% clean sheets.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Kitayosce averages 1.4 goals per match, Pamba Jiji 0.63; their xG are 1.35 (Kitayosce) and 1.08 (Pamba), total xG = 2.43, which indicates a moderate scoring game. The home side attempts more shots (7.5 vs 6.5) and has higher conversion (20% vs 10%), with Kitayosce conceding 0.8 goals per match and Pamba 1.13; clean sheets occur in 50% and 38% of matches respectively. Based on xG and seasonal averages (1.4 vs 0.63) I estimate about 1.30 goals for the home team and 1.10 for the away, total 2.40 expected goals. Seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 70% for Kitayosce and 63% for Pamba, therefore I assign Over 1.5 a high probability of 76%; Over 2.5 shows a weaker signal (50%/38% -> average ~44% and xG 2.43 just below 2.5) hence Over 2.5 ~48% vs Under 52%, while Over 3.5 is unlikely (10%/0% -> ~11%). As a result the best line to play is Over 1.5 (side: over, line: 1.5) as the strongest signal derived from xG, the hosts' higher conversion and high seasonal Over 1.5 percentages.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics suggest a draw at half-time: the home side have 63% of matches level at the break, the visitors 57%, with average first-half goals 0.63 for Kitayosce and 0.29 for Pamba Jiji. After the break the home advantage is pronounced — Kitayosce score on average 0.88 goals in the second half and collect 1.75 points in second halves, whereas Pamba Jiji record 0.00 goals and 0.43 points in second halves. The difference is amplified by efficiency: hosts have a 20% shot conversion rate versus 10% for the visitors and a higher xG (1.35 vs 1.08), increasing the likelihood of a turnaround after the break. Additionally, the home team lead at the break more often (25% vs 14% for the visitors) and possess better overall season results (50% wins vs 13%), indicating match control. Therefore the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1), which I assess as the strongest signal based on the above figures.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
KitayoscePamba Jiji
10Shots10
KitayoscePamba Jiji
4Shots on target0
KitayoscePamba Jiji
1.72xG1.66
KitayoscePamba Jiji
4Corners5
KitayoscePamba Jiji
112Dangerous attacks142
KitayoscePamba Jiji
-1Fouls-1
KitayoscePamba Jiji
-1Cards-1
KitayoscePamba Jiji

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

KitayoscePamba Jiji
1.06Goals scored / game1.06
KitayoscePamba Jiji
1Goals allowed / game0.94
KitayoscePamba Jiji
39%Average possession42%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
1.61Shots on target / game2.28
KitayoscePamba Jiji

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

5.17Shots per game5.28
KitayoscePamba Jiji
1.61Shots on target2.28
KitayoscePamba Jiji
20.4%Shot conversion20%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
39%Possession42%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
1.02xG for1.23
KitayoscePamba Jiji
1.29xG against1.22
KitayoscePamba Jiji

Shooting quality

Kitayosce: Counter-attackingPamba Jiji: Counter-attacking
KitayoscePamba Jiji
Accuracy (shots on target)31%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.200.23
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.660.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kitayosce is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Kitayosce · 1.2 pts / game - Pamba Jiji

Kitayosce
WDLWD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-6
1.33 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 20%
Pamba Jiji
WDDDL
Season result split
33% W44% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-4
1.44 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pamba Jiji is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Kitayosce · 0.94 goals / game - Pamba Jiji

Kitayosce scoring profile: mixed

Kitayosce scores in 50% of games (9 of 18 meczów), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 meczów).

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: mixed

Pamba Jiji scores in 61% of games (11 of 18 meczów), while Kitayosce keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 meczów).

19Goals scored (season)19
KitayoscePamba Jiji
18Goals conceded (season)17
KitayoscePamba Jiji
2.06Average goals per game2
KitayoscePamba Jiji
4Goals scored (last 5)4
KitayoscePamba Jiji
3Goals conceded (last 5)6
KitayoscePamba Jiji

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal61%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
33%2 goals28%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
17%3 goals17%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
6%4 goals0%
KitayoscePamba Jiji

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal56%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
33%2 goals22%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
11%3 goals17%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
0%4 goals0%
KitayoscePamba Jiji

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

32%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time17%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
6%Scored in both halves17%
KitayoscePamba Jiji

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS11%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
0%BTTS - last 540%
KitayoscePamba Jiji

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KitayoscePamba Jiji

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
KitayoscePamba Jiji

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pamba Jiji is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / game - Kitayosce · 1.17 pts / game - Pamba Jiji

Kitayosce - half-time state
17% leading56% draw28% trailing
Pamba Jiji - half-time state
17% leading67% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per game (1st half)1.17
KitayoscePamba Jiji
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.39
KitayoscePamba Jiji
0.39Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
KitayoscePamba Jiji
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.78
KitayoscePamba Jiji
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
78%No goal before half-time67%
KitayoscePamba Jiji

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per game (2nd half)1.11
KitayoscePamba Jiji
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.39
KitayoscePamba Jiji
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
KitayoscePamba Jiji
1Average goals (2nd half)0.89
KitayoscePamba Jiji
56%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KitayoscePamba Jiji
72%No goal after half-time72%
KitayoscePamba Jiji

Kitayosce - second-half results

22% W44% D33% L
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

22% W44% D33% L
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kitayosce - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.60.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pamba Jiji - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kitayosce
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
0
2
16-30
5
4
31-45
5
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.03
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
31%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kitayosce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 32% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 32% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KitayosceLigaPamba Jiji
Average goals per game 2.061.97 2.00
Both teams scored 28%32% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%33% 44%
Clean sheets 44%42% 44%
Goal before half-time 50%53% 50%
Goal after half-time 61%59% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.97
Average goals per game
32%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
42%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / game
0.76
Away goals / game
+59%
Home attack advantage
+37%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Valentin NoumaA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KitayosceAssistValentin Nouma

Head-to-head

Record from Kitayosce's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Pamba Jiji. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Pamba Jiji
0 : 0
Kitayosce

FAQ

What was the result of Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Kitayosce 1:0 Pamba Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?

Kitayosce score 1.06 goals per game on average and Pamba Jiji 1.06. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 1.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Kitayosce's matches and 33% of Pamba Jiji's.

What form are Kitayosce and Pamba Jiji in?

Over the last 5 games Kitayosce have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Pamba Jiji 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji?

The statistical background for Kitayosce vs Pamba Jiji — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.