Klubi-04 vs KTP: match statistics
Klubi-04 vs KTP: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Klubi-04 play KTP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 23 May 2026 at 18:00. Venue: Bolt Arena. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Klubi-04: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Klubi-04 scores 0.93 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. KTP scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Klubi-04 53%, KTP 40%. Over 2.5: Klubi-04 27%, KTP 40%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.25. Klubi-04: 9.5 shots per match, KTP: 15.3.
Match halves
Klubi-04: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.53. KTP: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07.
Goals by minute
Klubi-04: 31-45+ (3 goals). KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
The favorite is KTP: they sit 3rd in the table with a season record of 4 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, while Klubi-04 are 10th and have yet to win (0 wins, 3 draws, 4 losses). In their last 5 matches KTP average 2.0 points per game (3W, 1D, 1L), whereas Klubi-04 average just 0.6 points per game (0W, 3D, 2L), indicating a clear form advantage for the visitors. The visitors create significantly more chances: on the road they average 15.75 shots and 3.25 on target per match with xG 1.63, while the hosts at home average 8 shots and 2 on target with xG 1.06 — KTP therefore generates 0.57 more xG and nearly twice as many shot attempts. Defensively the gap also favors KTP — the visitors have 75% of away matches with a clean sheet, hosts have 0% clean sheets at home and lose 67% of their home games; average goals are 1.0 scored by KTP away versus 0.67 for the hosts at home, and 1.25 conceded by the visitors versus 1.33 conceded by the hosts. Considering superior form (2.0 vs 0.6 pts/game), markedly higher quality of chances (xG 1.63 vs 1.06) and a high clean-sheet rate for the visitors, I predict a KTP victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Klubi-04 | KTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Klubi-04 · 2 pts / match - KTP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
0.93 goals / match - Klubi-04 · 1.67 goals / match - KTP
KTP is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Klubi-04 · 1 goals / match - KTP
Klubi-04 scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
KTP scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Klubi-04 keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Klubi-04
Over / Under — KTP
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Klubi-04 · 1.33 pts / match - KTP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Klubi-04 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Klubi-04
KTP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| Klubi-04 | Liga | KTP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.13 | 2.47 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 53% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 44% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 73% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Klubi-04 vs KTP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished Klubi-04 0:1 KTP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Klubi-04 vs KTP?
Klubi-04 score 0.93 goals per game on average and KTP 1.67. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Klubi-04's matches and 40% of KTP's.
What form are Klubi-04 and KTP in?
Over the last 5 games Klubi-04 have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and KTP 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Klubi-04 vs KTP?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Klubi-04 vs KTP: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.