Klubi-04 vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics
Klubi-04 vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Klubi-04 played against SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Klubi-04 has 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. SJK Akatemia has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Klubi-04 scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 1.50. SJK Akatemia scores 0.75 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.05 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Klubi-04's games and 25% of SJK Akatemia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 25%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 0.85 per game. Klubi-04 takes 5.8 shots per game, while SJK Akatemia takes 5.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Klubi-04 leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Klubi-04's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For SJK Akatemia, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.05 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
SJK Akatemia is the favorite: the visitors scored 7 goals in the last 5 matches versus just 2 by the hosts in the same period. Klubi-04 have no wins this season (0 wins, 4 losses) and have lost all five most recent games, conceding 10 goals in those five matches, indicating serious defensive issues. SJK generates better chances — away averages of 7.5 shots, 2 on target and xG 0.94, while the hosts average 4 shots, 1.5 on target and xG 0.8, so the visitors have a qualitative edge. Although both teams concede on average 1.5 goals per match, the hosts score only 0.5 goals at home versus 1.0 for SJK away and have 50% of home matches without scoring. Considering average points per match in the last 5 (hosts 0, visitors 1.4), I assign 60% probability to an away win, 25% to a draw and 15% to a home upset.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Klubi-04 has a seasonal BTTS rate of 0% and scores on average 0.5 goals per match, while SJK Akatemia has a seasonal BTTS 50% and scores 1.0 on average. In the last 5 matches the home side averaged 0.4 goals scored and conceded 2.0, and the visitors averaged 1.4 scored and conceded 1.0, indicating greater attacking potential from SJK and limited goal production from Klubi-04. xG analysis shows the hosts generate approximately 0.76–0.80 xG per game, and the visitors 0.94–1.59 xG (seasonal/last 5), with Klubi-04 conceding 2.17 xG seasonally, so although they are vulnerable to conceded goals they create too few chances themselves. Additionally, the league has only 32% of matches with BTTS and as many as 84% of matches with a clean sheet, and Klubi-04 has 50% clean sheets at home, which together favor a No Goal/clean sheet expected scenario. Considering the hosts’ seasonal BTTS 0%, the low scoring averages 0.5/0.4 and the league and home clean sheet rates, I prefer the 'BTTS - No' bet as the stronger signal (estimated 70% vs 30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Averaging attack and defense yields about 0.99 xG for Klubi-04 (xG_for 0.76 vs xG_against_away 1.21 => average ≈0.99) and about 1.56 xG for SJK Akatemia (xG_for 0.94 vs xG_against_home 2.17 => ≈1.56), totaling ≈2.55 xG. SJK averages 7.5 shots and 2.0 on target with a 13% conversion (≈0.98 goals from those shots), while Klubi-04 has 4.0 shots and 1.5 on target (≈0.52 goals), confirming the visitors' creative advantage. In the last 5 matches the home side averaged 0.4 goals, the visitors 1.4 (total 1.8), yet both teams registered 60% of matches over 2.5 in that period; seasonally Klubi-04 has 0% matches over 2.5, while SJK has 50%. A Poisson model with λ=2.55 gives roughly a 72% probability for Over 1.5, about 47% for Over 2.5 and ~25% for Over 3.5. Based on this, the strongest and most justified selection is Over 1.5: high probability (72%), higher away xG (1.56) and consistent overs in the last 5 matches provide the edge.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal statistics show that Klubi-04 often takes a lead at the break — the home side led at half-time in 50% of matches, averaging 0.5 goals by half-time and scoring in the 0–15 minute window (1). SJK Akatemia, however, is stronger after the break: they average 1.5 goals in the second half, scored on average 1.4 goals in the second half across the last five matches and have a +6 second-half goal differential in those five games. Forms diverge — Klubi-04 have lost all of their last five matches, while SJK have won 2 of 5 (40%), which increases the likelihood of a turnaround. Considering the home lead at half-time (50%) and the visitors’ clear advantage after the break (1.5 goals), the most likely scenario is Klubi-04 leading at half-time and SJK winning after the break (HT/FT 1/2). Therefore the probability distribution favors 1/2 (25%), with a moderate probability for 1/1 (18%) and HT and FT draw (X/X 12%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Klubi-04 | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
SJK Akatemia is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - Klubi-04 · 0.75 goals / game - SJK Akatemia
SJK Akatemia is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Klubi-04 · 1 goals / game - SJK Akatemia
Klubi-04 scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).
SJK Akatemia scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while Klubi-04 keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Klubi-04
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
SJK Akatemia is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.25 pts / game - Klubi-04 · 1 pts / game - SJK Akatemia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Klubi-04 - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.25 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 25% | 75% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 75% |
| No goal | 75% | 75% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Klubi-04
SJK Akatemia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| Klubi-04 | Liga | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.00 | 2.05 | ▼ 1.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 32% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 42% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 63% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Klubi-04's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against SJK Akatemia. Games average 4.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Klubi-04 vs SJK Akatemia?
The Ykkösliiga match finished Klubi-04 1:1 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Klubi-04 and SJK Akatemia?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Klubi-04 won 2, SJK Akatemia won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Klubi-04 vs SJK Akatemia?
Klubi-04 score 0.50 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.75. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Klubi-04's matches and 25% of SJK Akatemia's.
What form are Klubi-04 and SJK Akatemia in?
Over the last 5 games Klubi-04 have a 0-0-4 record (0.00 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 1-1-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Klubi-04 vs SJK Akatemia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


