Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 20 July 2026

KMC vs Pamba Jiji: match statistics

KMC crest
KMC
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji

KMC vs Pamba Jiji: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KMC play Pamba Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 20 May 2026 at 17:30. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

KMC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Pamba Jiji: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KMC scores 0.57 and concedes 1.75 goals per match. Pamba Jiji scores 1.07 and concedes 1.17. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KMC 32%, Pamba Jiji 40%. Over 2.5: KMC 39%, Pamba Jiji 50%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Pamba Jiji has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.21. KMC: 6.6 shots per match, Pamba Jiji: 5.3.

Match halves

KMC: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.29. Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

KMC: 31-45+ (5 goals). Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Pamba Jiji holds a clear advantage in the standings and seasonal metrics: they sit 8th versus KMC in 16th, have 7 wins this season compared to KMC’s 2, and have scored 22 goals versus the hosts’ 13. In their last 5 matches KMC have scored 6 goals but conceded 10 and failed to win any game (0-1-4), yielding only 0.2 points per match, while Pamba over the same period have 1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses, 3 goals and 0.8 points per match. Although the hosts generate higher home xG (average 1.50 xG at home vs 1.25 xG for the visitors on the road) and produce more shots (9.11 vs 7.33), their finishing is poor — on average 0.56 goals per home match and a 6% conversion rate, whereas Pamba convert at 8% and average 0.67 goals away. KMC’s defence is also more exposed to high-quality chances (average xG against 1.82 at home vs 1.36 against Pamba away) and conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches, so I favor the away win. Suggested probabilities: 55% Pamba Jiji, 25% draw, 20% KMC upset.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
KMCPamba Jiji
5Shots13
KMCPamba Jiji
2Shots on target5
KMCPamba Jiji
1.24xG2.1
KMCPamba Jiji
2Corners4
KMCPamba Jiji
108Dangerous attacks130
KMCPamba Jiji
16Fouls22
KMCPamba Jiji
0Cards0
KMCPamba Jiji

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.57Goals scored / match1.07
KMCPamba Jiji
1.75Goals conceded / match1.17
KMCPamba Jiji
44%Average possession39%
KMCPamba Jiji
2.46Shots on target / match2.17
KMCPamba Jiji

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.64Shots per match5.27
KMCPamba Jiji
2.46Shots on target2.17
KMCPamba Jiji
8.6%Shot conversion20.3%
KMCPamba Jiji
44%Possession39%
KMCPamba Jiji
1.21xG for1.28
KMCPamba Jiji
1.57xG against1.31
KMCPamba Jiji

Shooting quality

KMC: BalancedPamba Jiji: Counter-attacking
KMCPamba Jiji
Accuracy (shots on target)37%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.24
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.49

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KMC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W11% R82% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-23
0.32 pts / match · goal difference -33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-9
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Pamba Jiji
LWLLL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pamba Jiji is 88% better for: goals scored per match.

0.57 goals / match - KMC · 1.07 goals / match - Pamba Jiji

Pamba Jiji is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.75 goals / match - KMC · 1.17 goals / match - Pamba Jiji

KMC scoring profile: mixed

KMC scores in 39% of matches (11 of 28 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: very strong

Pamba Jiji scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 matches).

16Goals scored (season)32
KMCPamba Jiji
49Goals conceded (season)35
KMCPamba Jiji
2.32Average goals in match2.23
KMCPamba Jiji
3Goals scored (last 5)7
KMCPamba Jiji
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
KMCPamba Jiji

How often they score at least...

39%1 goal63%
KMCPamba Jiji
14%2 goals27%
KMCPamba Jiji
4%3 goals13%
KMCPamba Jiji
0%4 goals3%
KMCPamba Jiji

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal63%
KMCPamba Jiji
43%2 goals37%
KMCPamba Jiji
36%3 goals17%
KMCPamba Jiji
7%4 goals0%
KMCPamba Jiji

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time20%
KMCPamba Jiji
7%BTTS in both halves0%
KMCPamba Jiji
11%Scored in both halves13%
KMCPamba Jiji

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
KMCPamba Jiji
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
KMCPamba Jiji
40%BTTS - last 560%
KMCPamba Jiji

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
KMCPamba Jiji
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
KMCPamba Jiji
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
KMCPamba Jiji

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
KMCPamba Jiji
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time30%
KMCPamba Jiji
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
KMCPamba Jiji

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pamba Jiji is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / match - KMC · 1.1 pts / match - Pamba Jiji

KMC - half-time state
11% leading43% draw46% trailing
Pamba Jiji - half-time state
17% leading60% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per match (1st half)1.1
KMCPamba Jiji
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.43
KMCPamba Jiji
0.93Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
KMCPamba Jiji
1.21Average goals (1st half)0.9
KMCPamba Jiji
43%Clean sheet before half-time57%
KMCPamba Jiji
71%No goal before half-time67%
KMCPamba Jiji

After half-time (2nd half)

0.68Points per match (2nd half)1
KMCPamba Jiji
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
KMCPamba Jiji
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
KMCPamba Jiji
1.07Average goals (2nd half)1.13
KMCPamba Jiji
43%Clean sheet after half-time53%
KMCPamba Jiji
79%No goal after half-time67%
KMCPamba Jiji

KMC - second-half results

7% W46% R46% P
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding64%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 7%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
33
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KMC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.6
Average goals in match1.80.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
9
0-15
3
8
16-30
5
10
31-45
4
8
46-60
0
7
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
8
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
23%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
44%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
201%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KMCLigaPamba Jiji
Average goals in match 2.322.17 2.23
Both teams scored 32%35% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%39% 50%
Clean sheets 11%39% 37%
Goal before half-time 68%60% 57%
Goal after half-time 61%63% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KMC 0 - 0 - 1 Pamba Jiji. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KMC vs Pamba Jiji?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished KMC 0:1 Pamba Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KMC vs Pamba Jiji?

KMC score 0.57 goals per game on average and Pamba Jiji 1.07. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 32% of KMC's matches and 40% of Pamba Jiji's.

What form are KMC and Pamba Jiji in?

Over the last 5 games KMC have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Pamba Jiji 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KMC vs Pamba Jiji?

The statistical background for KMC vs Pamba Jiji — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.