KMC vs Pamba Jiji: match statistics
KMC vs Pamba Jiji: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KMC played against Pamba Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on May 20, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
KMC has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Pamba Jiji has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
KMC scores 0.62 goals per game and allows 1.67. Pamba Jiji scores 0.96 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 2.08 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of KMC's games and 35% of Pamba Jiji's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 43%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KMC has the higher season xG average, 1.30 to 1.28 per game. KMC takes 6.8 shots per game, while Pamba Jiji takes 5.4.
First-half and second-half trends
KMC leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Pamba Jiji leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
KMC's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Pamba Jiji, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.08 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pamba Jiji holds a clear advantage in the standings and seasonal metrics: they sit 8th versus KMC in 16th, have 7 wins this season compared to KMC’s 2, and have scored 22 goals versus the hosts’ 13. In their last 5 matches KMC have scored 6 goals but conceded 10 and failed to win any game (0-1-4), yielding only 0.2 points per match, while Pamba over the same period have 1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses, 3 goals and 0.8 points per match. Although the hosts generate higher home xG (average 1.50 xG at home vs 1.25 xG for the visitors on the road) and produce more shots (9.11 vs 7.33), their finishing is poor — on average 0.56 goals per home match and a 6% conversion rate, whereas Pamba convert at 8% and average 0.67 goals away. KMC’s defense is also more exposed to high-quality chances (average xG against 1.82 at home vs 1.36 against Pamba away) and conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches, so I favor the away win. Suggested probabilities: 55% Pamba Jiji, 25% draw, 20% KMC upset.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal and league numbers favor No Goal: KMC has 55% clean sheets at home and concedes 0.73 goals per game on the season, Pamba Jiji fails to score in 58% of away matches and averages 0.67 goals per game, while season BTTS rates are only 36% (KMC) and 33% (Pamba) versus a league level of 33%. Pamba registers 3.78 shots on target per game compared to KMC’s 2.67, but the visitors’ shot conversion is only 8% versus the hosts’ 19%, suggesting the away side creates chances but rarely converts them. Season xG are similar (1.31 for KMC vs 1.25 for Pamba), yet actual goals favor the home team (1.27 vs 0.67), i.e., the quality of chances does not translate into goals for the visitors. The counterargument is short-term variance: in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of KMC’s games; KMC had xG 1.5 and conceded an average 2.0 goals (6 scored, 10 conceded), while Pamba has xG 1.44 over the last 5. Taking into account 55% home clean sheets, 58% of away matches without a goal, and low seasonal BTTS (36% and 33%) and league 33%, I assess a stronger signal for “No, both teams will not score” (~70%) versus 30% for the opposite scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Average combined xG suggests roughly 2.60 goals: KMC has attacking xG 1.31, Pamba Jiji concedes on average 1.36 xG to opponents (1.34 average for home teams), while Pamba’s attacking xG is 1.25 with KMC conceding 1.26 (1.26 average for away teams). Poisson for λ=2.60 yields ~73% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~48% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~26% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5), making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. Match data support this: KMC scores 1.27 goals at home on average, Pamba Jiji scores 0.67 on the road, but the visitors generate 3.78 shots on target versus KMC’s 2.67 and have xG 1.25, so they can create chances despite low finishing efficiency (8% vs 19% for the home side). Although KMC have 55% clean sheets this season, in the last 5 matches they concede on average 2.0 goals, and BTTS rates are low for both (36% and 33%), suggesting the projected ~2.6 goals may come mainly from one dominant side or isolated high-scoring fixtures. Therefore I recommend a bet on Over 1.5 (line 1.5) as the best choice — the high probability ~73% derived from xG 2.60 and season Over 1.5 rates (64% KMC, 67% Pamba) outweigh the signal for the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Based on the data, the strongest scenario is a draw at half-time with a KMC victory at full-time (X/1). KMC were level at the break in 67% of their home matches and led only in 22% of cases, with average first-half goals of 0.56 for the hosts versus 0.36 for Pamba Jiji, which favors a Half-Time draw. In the second half KMC score an average of 0.78 goals compared to just 0.09 for the visitors, and the hosts collected 15 points after the break—an average of 1.67 points per match—demonstrating their ability to stage a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 1.31 versus 1.25 for the guests with shot conversion rates of 19% vs 8%, so KMC have an efficiency edge and are most likely to swing the result in their favor after an HT draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KMC | Pamba Jiji | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.24 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Pamba Jiji is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - KMC · 0.8 pts / game - Pamba Jiji
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pamba Jiji is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
0.62 goals / game - KMC · 0.96 goals / game - Pamba Jiji
Pamba Jiji is 61% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - KMC · 1.04 goals / game - Pamba Jiji
KMC scores in 43% of games (9 of 21 meczów), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 meczów).
Pamba Jiji scores in 57% of games (13 of 23 meczów), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KMC
Over / Under - Pamba Jiji
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pamba Jiji is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.9 pts / game - KMC · 1.17 pts / game - Pamba Jiji
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KMC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Pamba Jiji - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KMC
Pamba Jiji
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| KMC | Liga | Pamba Jiji | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.29 | 2.08 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | • 33% | 34% | • 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 38% | 37% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 41% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 56% | ▼ 48% |
| Goal after half-time | • 62% | 62% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KMC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Pamba Jiji. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KMC vs Pamba Jiji?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished KMC 0:1 Pamba Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KMC vs Pamba Jiji?
KMC score 0.62 goals per game on average and Pamba Jiji 0.96. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KMC's matches and 35% of Pamba Jiji's.
What form are KMC and Pamba Jiji in?
Over the last 5 games KMC have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Pamba Jiji 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KMC vs Pamba Jiji?
The statistical background for KMC vs Pamba Jiji — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


