Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of September 07, 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

KMC vs Simba: match statistics

KMC vs Simba: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KMC plays Simba in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Recent form

KMC has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Simba has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

KMC scores 0.36 goals per game and allows 1.50. Simba scores 2.00 and allows 0.57. Games in this league average 1.78 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 21% of KMC's games and 29% of Simba's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 57%, compared with league averages of 29% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Simba has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.30 per game. KMC takes 6.8 shots per game, while Simba takes 8.1.

First-half and second-half trends

KMC leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.14 goals per game after halftime. Simba leads at halftime in 71% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

KMC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Simba, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ligi kuu Bara games average 1.78 goals. Both teams score in 29% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.36Goals scored / game2
KMCSimba
1.5Goals allowed / game0.57
KMCSimba
43%Average possession50%
KMCSimba
2.36Shots on target / game3.43
KMCSimba

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.79Shots per game8.14
KMCSimba
2.36Shots on target3.43
KMCSimba
5.3%Shot conversion24.6%
KMCSimba
43%Possession50%
KMCSimba
1.3xG for1.63
KMCSimba
1.62xG against0.69
KMCSimba

Shooting quality

KMC: BalancedSimba: Efficient finishing
KMCSimba
Accuracy (shots on target)35%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.150.58

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Simba is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - KMC · 2 pts / game - Simba

KMC
LDLWL
Season result split
14% W14% R71% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-10
0.57 pts / game · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LLLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Simba
WWLDW
Season result split
71% W14% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-1
2.29 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 0.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Simba is 456% better for: goals scored per game.

0.36 goals / game - KMC · 2 goals / game - Simba

Simba is 163% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - KMC · 0.57 goals / game - Simba

KMC scoring profile: more difficult

KMC scores in 36% of games (5 of 14 meczów), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 meczów).

Simba scoring profile: very strong

Simba scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 meczów), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 21% (3 of 14 meczów).

5Goals scored (season)14
KMCSimba
21Goals conceded (season)4
KMCSimba
1.86Average goals per game2.57
KMCSimba
3Goals scored (last 5)8
KMCSimba
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
KMCSimba

How often they score at least...

36%1 goal86%
KMCSimba
0%2 goals71%
KMCSimba
0%3 goals43%
KMCSimba
0%4 goals0%
KMCSimba

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal43%
KMCSimba
36%2 goals14%
KMCSimba
29%3 goals0%
KMCSimba
7%4 goals0%
KMCSimba

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time0%
KMCSimba
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KMCSimba
0%Scored in both halves57%
KMCSimba

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS14%
KMCSimba
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS43%
KMCSimba
40%BTTS - last 540%
KMCSimba

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
KMCSimba
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
KMCSimba
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KMCSimba

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KMCSimba
14%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
KMCSimba
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
KMCSimba

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Simba is 183% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.86 pts / game - KMC · 2.43 pts / game - Simba

KMC - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing
Simba - half-time state
71% leading29% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per game (1st half)2.43
KMCSimba
0.21Goals scored (1st half)1
KMCSimba
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0
KMCSimba
1Average goals (1st half)1
KMCSimba
50%Clean sheet before half-time100%
KMCSimba
79%No goal before half-time29%
KMCSimba

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per game (2nd half)2.14
KMCSimba
0.14Goals scored (2nd half)1
KMCSimba
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
KMCSimba
0.79Average goals (2nd half)1.57
KMCSimba
50%Clean sheet after half-time57%
KMCSimba
86%No goal after half-time29%
KMCSimba

KMC - second-half results

7% W50% R43% P
12
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Simba - second-half results

71% W0% R29% P
17
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 71% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KMC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Simba - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.80
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KMC
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
4
16-30
1
4
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
3
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Simba
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
0
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.5 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
124%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
31%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KMC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.94
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
30%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
250%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Simba

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.94
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
333%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
48%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

KMCLigaSimba
Average goals per game 1.861.78 2.57
Both teams scored 21%29% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%26% 57%
Clean sheets 21%43% 57%
Goal before half-time 64%48% 71%
Goal after half-time 57%56% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.78
Average goals per game
29%
Both teams scored
26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
43%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / game
0.60
Away goals / game
+98%
Home attack advantage
+50%
Home defensive advantage
+33%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
48%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals