KMC vs Young Africans: match statistics
KMC vs Young Africans: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KMC played against Young Africans in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on May 6, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
KMC has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Young Africans has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
KMC scores 0.44 goals per game and allows 1.50. Young Africans scores 2.37 and allows 0.26. Games in this league average 2.02 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 28% of KMC's games and 21% of Young Africans's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 53%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Young Africans has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.26 per game. KMC takes 7.0 shots per game, while Young Africans takes 9.5.
First-half and second-half trends
KMC leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.17 goals per game after halftime. Young Africans leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.26 after halftime.
When the teams score
KMC's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Young Africans, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.02 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I forecast a Young Africans win (2). The visitors are leaders (1st place) with a record of 13 wins, 6 draws and 0 losses and a goal tally of 45:5; KMC sit 16th with 2 wins, 3 draws, 13 losses and a goal record of 8:27. In their last 5 matches Young Africans scored 15 goals and average 2.2 points per game, while KMC have 4 goals and 0.2 points per game, indicating an advantage in form and efficiency for the visitors. Young Africans away average 4.25 shots on target from 10.13 attempts with a conversion rate of 12%, whereas KMC at home average 3.29 shots on target from 9.29 attempts with a 5% conversion; additionally the visitors concede 0.33 goals per away match versus the hosts conceding 0.86 at home. KMC fail to score in 57% of home games, while Young Africans are goalless in only 33% of away matches, therefore I assign a 70% probability to an away win, 22% to a draw and 8% to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators strongly argue that both teams rarely score in the same match: KMC had BTTS in 20% of matches this season, and Young Africans in 22%, with KMC keeping a clean sheet in 80% of fixtures and Young Africans in 78%. The last 5 matches, however, give a contrary short-term signal — KMC had BTTS in 60% of their last 5 games, scoring on average 0.8 goals and conceding 1.6 per match, while Young Africans scored 15 goals in their last five (avg 3.0) and conceded 0.6 on average (BTTS in 40%). xG and shots analysis shows goal potential: xG for KMC is 1.94 vs xG against Young Africans 1.06, xG for Young Africans is 1.52 vs xG against KMC 0.99, and KMC register 7.14 shots on target on average compared to 4.25 for Young Africans. Despite Young Africans’ recent form (15 goals in 5 matches) and KMC’s recent concession rate of 1.6, the long-term clean sheet rates of 80% and 78% and low seasonal BTTS (20%/22%) are the stronger long-term signal; therefore I predict No BTTS ('no') with a probability of 70% versus 30% for 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Estimated xG is 1.50 for KMC (attack xG 1.94 and away defense xG 1.06 → (1.94+1.06)/2=1.50) and 1.26 for Young Africans ((1.52+0.99)/2=1.26), totaling 2.76 xG. KMC have 90% of their season matches over 1.5 goals versus 44% for away teams — a weighted average is roughly 72% — and KMC average 13.71 shots (7.14 on target) with a 26% conversion compared to Young Africans’ 10.13 (4.25 on target) and 12%, which increases the hosts’ scoring probability. For the 2.5 line, hosts have 70% of matches over 2.5, guests 33%, but in the last 5 matches Young Africans generated 2.06 xG on average and had 80% over 2.5, which lifts the over 2.5 assessment to about 62%. The 3.5 line is less convincing (hosts 50% over 3.5, guests 11% and combined xG 2.76 < 3.5), therefore the strongest signal from the data is a play on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Season-long figures clearly favor KMC: the hosts average 3.4 goals per game (1.44 by half), concede only 0.2 goals per game (0.22 by half) and lead at the break in 56% of matches with 80% clean sheets on the season. KMC have a 90% win rate this season, register more shots (13.71 vs 10.13) and more shots on target (7.14 vs 4.25), possess a higher xG of 1.94 versus Young Africans’ 1.52 and better conversion (26% vs 12%), which increases the likelihood of maintaining a halftime lead and securing a full-time victory. However, note that KMC have not won in their last 5 matches (0% wins) and have only 0.4 goals by half in those five games, while Young Africans have a 60% win rate in their last 5 and average 1.8 goals by half, so the risk of a draw or a turnaround is material. Accordingly, I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (38%) as the strongest signal, while also accounting for draw outcomes and the possibility of an away win (e.g. 2/2 13%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KMC | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.56 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Young Africans is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - KMC · 2.2 pts / game - Young Africans
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Young Africans is 439% better for: goals scored per game.
0.44 goals / game - KMC · 2.37 goals / game - Young Africans
Young Africans is 477% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - KMC · 0.26 goals / game - Young Africans
KMC scores in 39% of games (7 of 18 meczów), while Young Africans keeps a clean sheet in 79% (15 of 19 meczów).
Young Africans scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 meczów), while KMC keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KMC
Over / Under - Young Africans
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Young Africans is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / game - KMC · 1.79 pts / game - Young Africans
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KMC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Young Africans - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 68%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +7 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KMC
Young Africans
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| KMC | Liga | Young Africans | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.94 | 2.02 | ▲ 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 34% | ▼ 21% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 36% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 41% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 55% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 60% | ▲ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Young AfricansGoalAllan OkelloAssist: Shekhani Ibrahim Khamis
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KMC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Young Africans. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KMC vs Young Africans?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished KMC 0:1 Young Africans. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KMC vs Young Africans?
KMC score 0.44 goals per game on average and Young Africans 2.37. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 28% of KMC's matches and 21% of Young Africans's.
What form are KMC and Young Africans in?
Over the last 5 games KMC have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Young Africans 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KMC vs Young Africans?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KMC vs Young Africans: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


