Kokand-1912 vs Buxoro: match statistics
Kokand-1912 vs Buxoro: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kokand-1912 played against Buxoro in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on August 24, 2026. Venue: Markaziy Stadion. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Kokand-1912 has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Buxoro has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kokand-1912 scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 1.39. Buxoro scores 1.50 and allows 1.06. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Kokand-1912's games and 56% of Buxoro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 44%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Buxoro has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 1.16 per game. Kokand-1912 takes 9.6 shots per game, while Buxoro takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Kokand-1912 leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Buxoro leads at halftime in 44% and scores 0.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kokand-1912's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Buxoro, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Buxoro sit 4th and have collected 10 points from their last five matches, winning 3 games, while Kokand-1912 have managed only 4 points in the same period, with 1 win and 3 defeats. The visitors are also more effective at creating chances away from home, averaging 10.75 shots and 4 on target per match, compared with Kokand’s 9 shots and 2.88 on target. However, the hosts’ advantage comes from a significantly more stable home defense, conceding an average of 1.25 goals with an xG against of 1.39, while Buxoro allow opponents an xG of 1.65 away from home and concede 1.63 goals per match. Kokand win 38% of their home matches, whereas Buxoro win just 25% of their away games and lose as many as half of them. The visitors’ superior current form is therefore offset by their weaker away record, making a draw the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes has a slight edge, as Buxoro’s away fixtures have seen both teams score in 63% of matches, compared with 44% for Kokand-1912 at home. The hosts average 1.56 goals on home soil, while Buxoro concede 1.63 goals away from home, strongly supporting a Kokand-1912 goal. The visitors average 1.13 goals away, while the hosts’ defensive form has deteriorated over their last five matches to 1.8 goals conceded per game. Kokand-1912’s last five matches produced BTTS in 60% of cases, while Buxoro’s xG during this period stands at 1.33, compared with the 1.53 xG allowed by Kokand-1912’s opponents. The signal is not particularly strong, as Kokand-1912 keep a clean sheet in 44% of their home matches, but the hosts’ current defensive numbers shift the forecast towards a scenario in which both teams score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kokand-1912 score an average of 1.56 goals per match, while Buxoro concede 1.63, giving the hosts a solid chance of finding the net. The visitors average 1.27 xG in attack, but Kokand-1912 have kept a clean sheet in 44% of their matches and have conceded just 0.56 goals per game over the season. In their last five appearances, however, the hosts’ defense has clearly weakened, conceding 1.8 goals per match, meaning the projected total of 2.57 goals does not rule out a move above the 2.5-goal line. At the same time, only 11% of Kokand-1912 matches and 38% of Buxoro games produced at least 4 goals, while neither team has scored more than 3 goals in a single match. The strongest signal therefore points to Under 3.5, as the data support a two- or three-goal scenario far more often than an open, four-goal contest.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kokand-1912 have won 78% of their home matches and average 2.44 points per game on home soil, while Buxoro have lost 50% of their away matches and concede an average of 1.63 goals. The hosts also hold a clear advantage before the break: they led in 7 of 9 home matches, or 78%, while the visitors score just 0.50 goals away from home in the first half and have failed to score before half-time in 63% of such matches. Kokand-1912 allow opponents just 0.56 goals per match and keep a clean sheet in 44% of their games, which supports them in maintaining a lead once established. The hosts’ attack also produces a higher average xG, 1.44 compared with 1.27, and records more shots on target, 5.11 compared with 4.00. Recent form is more favourable for Buxoro, who have taken 2.0 points per game across their last five matches, but Kokand-1912’s home and first-half data still make a home lead at the break followed by a full-time victory the most likely HT/FT scenario: 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kokand-1912 | Buxoro | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Buxoro is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Kokand-1912 · 2 pts / game - Buxoro
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Buxoro is 69% better for: goals scored per game.
0.89 goals / game - Kokand-1912 · 1.5 goals / game - Buxoro
Buxoro is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.39 goals / game - Kokand-1912 · 1.06 goals / game - Buxoro
Kokand-1912 scores in 61% of games (11 of 18 meczów), while Buxoro keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
Buxoro scores in 89% of games (16 of 18 meczów), while Kokand-1912 keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kokand-1912
Over / Under - Buxoro
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Buxoro is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / game - Kokand-1912 · 1.67 pts / game - Buxoro
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kokand-1912 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Buxoro - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kokand-1912
Buxoro
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Kokand-1912 | Liga | Buxoro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.28 | 2.63 | • 2.56 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | • 28% | 27% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 68% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 61% | 76% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kokand-1912's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Buxoro. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kokand-1912 vs Buxoro?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Kokand-1912 1:1 Buxoro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kokand-1912 and Buxoro?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kokand-1912 won 1, Buxoro won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kokand-1912 vs Buxoro?
Kokand-1912 score 0.89 goals per game on average and Buxoro 1.50. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Kokand-1912's matches and 56% of Buxoro's.
What form are Kokand-1912 and Buxoro in?
Over the last 5 games Kokand-1912 have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Buxoro 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kokand-1912 vs Buxoro?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.