Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 16 July 2026

Kokand-1912 vs Nasaf: match statistics

Kokand-1912 crest
Kokand-1912
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Nasaf crest
Nasaf

Kokand-1912 vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kokand-1912 play Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 8 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Kokand-1912: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Nasaf: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kokand-1912 scores 0.91 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Nasaf scores 1.09 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kokand-1912 55%, Nasaf 55%. Over 2.5: Kokand-1912 55%, Nasaf 27%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Nasaf has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.17. Kokand-1912: 9.7 shots per match, Nasaf: 11.6.

Match halves

Kokand-1912: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.55. Nasaf: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Kokand-1912: 76-90+ (4 goals). Nasaf: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the away win (Nasaf) — they sit 3rd versus Kokand’s 12th and have the superior run: in the last 5 matches Nasaf recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (avg 2.0 pts/match) while Kokand managed 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses (avg 1.0 pt/match). The decisive edge is Nasaf’s defense: the visitors concede 0.5 goals per away match this season versus Kokand’s 1.5 goals conceded at home; over the last 5 games that’s 2 goals conceded for Nasaf versus 6 for Kokand (avg 0.4 vs 1.2 per match). In chance creation Nasaf also dominates — average xG for the visitors is 1.45 away compared to 0.84 xG for the hosts at home, with Nasaf averaging 13 shots and 3.5 on target per match versus Kokand’s 6 shots and 2.5 on target. Although Kokand shows higher shot conversion at home (25% vs 12% for Nasaf), both teams have a similar goals-per-game average in home/away splits (1.5), so quality and volume of chances and the visitors’ superior defense tilt the balance. Given these numbers — xG 1.45 vs 0.84, average goals conceded 0.5 vs 1.5 and better form (avg 2.0 vs 1.0 pts/match) — I estimate Nasaf win probability at 68%, draw 20% and Kokand win 12%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Kokand-1912Nasaf
13Shots9
Kokand-1912Nasaf
6Shots on target4
Kokand-1912Nasaf
1.5xG1.1
Kokand-1912Nasaf
2Corners1
Kokand-1912Nasaf
36Dangerous attacks34
Kokand-1912Nasaf
10Fouls11
Kokand-1912Nasaf
1Cards4
Kokand-1912Nasaf

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.91Goals scored / match1.09
Kokand-1912Nasaf
1.36Goals conceded / match1
Kokand-1912Nasaf
52%Average possession50%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
3.27Shots on target / match3.82
Kokand-1912Nasaf

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.73Shots per match11.55
Kokand-1912Nasaf
3.27Shots on target3.82
Kokand-1912Nasaf
9.3%Shot conversion9.4%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
52%Possession50%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
1.17xG for1.33
Kokand-1912Nasaf
1.41xG against1.4
Kokand-1912Nasaf

Shooting quality

Kokand-1912: BalancedNasaf: Balanced
Kokand-1912Nasaf
Accuracy (shots on target)34%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kokand-1912 is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Kokand-1912 · 0.6 pts / match - Nasaf

Kokand-1912
DDLLW
Season result split
18% W45% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Nasaf
DLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W45% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-3
1.27 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
WDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nasaf is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

0.91 goals / match - Kokand-1912 · 1.09 goals / match - Nasaf

Nasaf is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Kokand-1912 · 1 goals / match - Nasaf

Kokand-1912 scoring profile: strong

Kokand-1912 scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 matches).

Nasaf scoring profile: very strong

Nasaf scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Kokand-1912 keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

10Goals scored (season)12
Kokand-1912Nasaf
15Goals conceded (season)11
Kokand-1912Nasaf
2.27Average goals in match2.09
Kokand-1912Nasaf
4Goals scored (last 5)6
Kokand-1912Nasaf
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
Kokand-1912Nasaf

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal82%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
27%2 goals27%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
0%3 goals0%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
0%4 goals0%
Kokand-1912Nasaf

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal64%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
45%2 goals27%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
9%3 goals9%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
9%4 goals0%
Kokand-1912Nasaf

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time18%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
9%BTTS in both halves9%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
18%Scored in both halves9%
Kokand-1912Nasaf

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
40%BTTS - last 580%
Kokand-1912Nasaf

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time45%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kokand-1912Nasaf

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Kokand-1912Nasaf

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nasaf is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.82 pts / match - Kokand-1912 · 1 pts / match - Nasaf

Kokand-1912 - half-time state
9% leading55% draw36% trailing
Nasaf - half-time state
9% leading73% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.82Points per match (1st half)1
Kokand-1912Nasaf
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.36
Kokand-1912Nasaf
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Kokand-1912Nasaf
1.18Average goals (1st half)0.73
Kokand-1912Nasaf
45%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
64%No goal before half-time73%
Kokand-1912Nasaf

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.45
Kokand-1912Nasaf
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Kokand-1912Nasaf
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Kokand-1912Nasaf
1.09Average goals (2nd half)1.36
Kokand-1912Nasaf
64%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Kokand-1912Nasaf
55%No goal after half-time36%
Kokand-1912Nasaf

Kokand-1912 - second-half results

18% W64% R18% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nasaf - second-half results

36% W36% R27% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kokand-1912 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Nasaf - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kokand-1912
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
6
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
3
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.18
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kokand-1912

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.67
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
42% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
42%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

Kokand-1912LigaNasaf
Average goals in match 2.272.53 2.09
Both teams scored 55%52% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%51% 27%
Clean sheets 27%27% 36%
Goal before half-time 64%67% 45%
Goal after half-time 55%77% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.19
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kokand-1912 0 - 0 - 2 Nasaf. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FC Nasaf Qarshi
3 : 0
FK Qo'qon 1912
FK Qo'qon 1912
0 : 2
FC Nasaf Qarshi

FAQ

What was the result of Kokand-1912 vs Nasaf?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Kokand-1912 1:1 Nasaf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kokand-1912 and Nasaf?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kokand-1912 won 0, Nasaf won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kokand-1912 vs Nasaf?

Kokand-1912 score 0.91 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.09. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Kokand-1912's matches and 55% of Nasaf's.

What form are Kokand-1912 and Nasaf in?

Over the last 5 games Kokand-1912 have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Nasaf 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kokand-1912 vs Nasaf?

The statistical background for Kokand-1912 vs Nasaf — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.