Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 17 July 2026

Kokand-1912 vs Navbahor: match statistics

Kokand-1912 crest
Kokand-1912
2 : 1half-time 1:1
Navbahor crest
Navbahor
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Navbahor displays a decidedly better away form with a 100% win rate in away matches (2 wins out of 2 games), while Kokand-1912 has not won any home match this season (0% efficiency). The hosts have a negative goal difference (-1) in home matches and have lost all games in front of their own fans. Navbahor stands out with decidedly better offensive statistics - averaging 2 goals per away game with an xG of 1.46, while Kokand records only 1 goal on average with an xG of 0.66. Additionally, the visitors maintain a solid defense with a 50% clean sheet rate away from home and concede only 0.5 goals on average. The form of both teams from the last 5 matches also speaks in favor of Navbahor (1.6 pts/game vs 1.0 pts/game), making them the clear favorite for this encounter.

Kokand-1912 vs Navbahor: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kokand-1912 play Navbahor in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 18 March 2026 at 15:15. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Kokand-1912: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Navbahor: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kokand-1912 scores 0.91 and concedes 1.36 goals per match. Navbahor scores 1.27 and concedes 0.73. League average: 2.55 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kokand-1912 55%, Navbahor 45%. Over 2.5: Kokand-1912 55%, Navbahor 36%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Navbahor has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.17. Kokand-1912: 9.7 shots per match, Navbahor: 13.6.

Match halves

Kokand-1912: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.55. Navbahor: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Kokand-1912: 76-90+ (4 goals). Navbahor: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Navbahor displays a decidedly better away form with a 100% win rate in away matches (2 wins out of 2 games), while Kokand-1912 has not won any home match this season (0% efficiency). The hosts have a negative goal difference (-1) in home matches and have lost all games in front of their own fans. Navbahor stands out with decidedly better offensive statistics - averaging 2 goals per away game with an xG of 1.46, while Kokand records only 1 goal on average with an xG of 0.66. Additionally, the visitors maintain a solid defense with a 50% clean sheet rate away from home and concede only 0.5 goals on average. The form of both teams from the last 5 matches also speaks in favor of Navbahor (1.6 pts/game vs 1.0 pts/game), making them the clear favorite for this encounter.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

40Possession (%)60
Kokand-1912Navbahor
9Shots14
Kokand-1912Navbahor
2Shots on target4
Kokand-1912Navbahor
1.01xG1.47
Kokand-1912Navbahor
2Corners7
Kokand-1912Navbahor
41Dangerous attacks43
Kokand-1912Navbahor
11Fouls6
Kokand-1912Navbahor
5Cards0
Kokand-1912Navbahor

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.91Goals scored / match1.27
Kokand-1912Navbahor
1.36Goals conceded / match0.73
Kokand-1912Navbahor
52%Average possession56%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
3.27Shots on target / match4.64
Kokand-1912Navbahor

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.73Shots per match13.55
Kokand-1912Navbahor
3.27Shots on target4.64
Kokand-1912Navbahor
9.3%Shot conversion9.4%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
52%Possession56%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
1.17xG for1.59
Kokand-1912Navbahor
1.41xG against1.03
Kokand-1912Navbahor

Shooting quality

Kokand-1912: BalancedNavbahor: Balanced
Kokand-1912Navbahor
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Navbahor is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Kokand-1912 · 1.6 pts / match - Navbahor

Kokand-1912
DDLLW
Season result split
18% W45% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-4
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Navbahor
WWDLD
Season result split
55% W18% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-3
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Navbahor is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

0.91 goals / match - Kokand-1912 · 1.27 goals / match - Navbahor

Navbahor is 86% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.36 goals / match - Kokand-1912 · 0.73 goals / match - Navbahor

Kokand-1912 scoring profile: mixed

Kokand-1912 scores in 64% of matches (7 of 11 matches), while Navbahor keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 matches).

Navbahor scoring profile: very strong

Navbahor scores in 82% of matches (9 of 11 matches), while Kokand-1912 keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 matches).

10Goals scored (season)14
Kokand-1912Navbahor
15Goals conceded (season)8
Kokand-1912Navbahor
2.27Average goals in match2
Kokand-1912Navbahor
4Goals scored (last 5)6
Kokand-1912Navbahor
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
Kokand-1912Navbahor

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal82%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
27%2 goals45%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
0%3 goals0%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
0%4 goals0%
Kokand-1912Navbahor

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal55%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
45%2 goals18%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
9%3 goals0%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
9%4 goals0%
Kokand-1912Navbahor

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time27%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
9%BTTS in both halves0%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
18%Scored in both halves9%
Kokand-1912Navbahor

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
40%BTTS - last 540%
Kokand-1912Navbahor

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time55%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Kokand-1912Navbahor

2nd half

55%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Kokand-1912Navbahor

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Navbahor is 111% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.82 pts / match - Kokand-1912 · 1.73 pts / match - Navbahor

Kokand-1912 - half-time state
9% leading55% draw36% trailing
Navbahor - half-time state
36% leading64% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.82Points per match (1st half)1.73
Kokand-1912Navbahor
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.82
Kokand-1912Navbahor
0.82Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
Kokand-1912Navbahor
1.18Average goals (1st half)1.09
Kokand-1912Navbahor
45%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
64%No goal before half-time45%
Kokand-1912Navbahor

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.18
Kokand-1912Navbahor
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
Kokand-1912Navbahor
0.55Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
Kokand-1912Navbahor
1.09Average goals (2nd half)0.91
Kokand-1912Navbahor
64%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Kokand-1912Navbahor
55%No goal after half-time64%
Kokand-1912Navbahor

Kokand-1912 - second-half results

18% W64% R18% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.82
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 18%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Navbahor - second-half results

27% W36% R36% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kokand-1912 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Navbahor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kokand-1912
ScoredConceded
1
6
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
6
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Navbahor
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
2
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kokand-1912

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

Navbahor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

Kokand-1912LigaNavbahor
Average goals in match 2.272.55 2.00
Both teams scored 55%53% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%52% 36%
Clean sheets 27%27% 45%
Goal before half-time 64%68% 55%
Goal after half-time 55%78% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.55
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kokand-1912 1 - 0 - 1 Navbahor. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Qo'qon 1912
2 : 0
FK Navbahor Namangan
FK Navbahor Namangan
3 : 0
FK Qo'qon 1912

FAQ

What was the result of Kokand-1912 vs Navbahor?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Kokand-1912 2:1 Navbahor. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kokand-1912 and Navbahor?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kokand-1912 won 1, Navbahor won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kokand-1912 vs Navbahor?

Kokand-1912 score 0.91 goals per game on average and Navbahor 1.27. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 55% of Kokand-1912's matches and 45% of Navbahor's.

What form are Kokand-1912 and Navbahor in?

Over the last 5 games Kokand-1912 have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Navbahor 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kokand-1912 vs Navbahor?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.