Kolding IF vs Aarhus Fremad: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kolding IF played against Aarhus Fremad in 1st Division (Denmark). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Kolding IF has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Aarhus Fremad has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Kolding IF scores 1.35 goals per game and allows 1.12. Aarhus Fremad scores 1.53 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 53% of Kolding IF's games and 59% of Aarhus Fremad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 59%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Aarhus Fremad has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.50 per game. Kolding IF takes 13.2 shots per game, while Aarhus Fremad takes 12.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Kolding IF leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Aarhus Fremad leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.82 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kolding IF's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Aarhus Fremad, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1st Division games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
8Shots21
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
5Shots on target9
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
1.15xG2.5
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
2Corners5
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
41Dangerous attacks75
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
20Fouls8
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
4Cards4
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
1.35Goals scored / game1.53
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
1.12Goals allowed / game1.41
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
54%Average possession57%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
4.12Shots on target / game4.82
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.24Shots per game12.76
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
4.12Shots on target4.82
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
10.2%Shot conversion12%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
54%Possession57%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
1.5xG for1.53
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
1.29xG against1.47
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

Shooting quality

Kolding IF: BalancedAarhus Fremad: Balanced
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
Accuracy (shots on target)31%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kolding IF is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Kolding IF · 0.6 pts / game - Aarhus Fremad

Kolding IF
LWDLW
Season result split
41% W24% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-6
1.47 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Aarhus Fremad
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
24% W41% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-6
1.12 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aarhus Fremad is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.35 goals / game - Kolding IF · 1.53 goals / game - Aarhus Fremad

Kolding IF is 26% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.12 goals / game - Kolding IF · 1.41 goals / game - Aarhus Fremad

Kolding IF scoring profile: very strong

Kolding IF scores in 82% of games (14 of 17 meczów), while Aarhus Fremad keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 meczów).

Aarhus Fremad scoring profile: strong

Aarhus Fremad scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while Kolding IF keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)26
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
19Goals conceded (season)24
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
2.47Average goals per game2.94
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
7Goals scored (last 5)5
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal65%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
41%2 goals47%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
12%3 goals29%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
0%4 goals6%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal82%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
35%2 goals53%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
12%3 goals6%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
0%4 goals0%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time24%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
0%BTTS in both halves18%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
24%Scored in both halves41%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
60%BTTS - last 540%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kolding IF is 56% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.65 pts / game - Kolding IF · 1.06 pts / game - Aarhus Fremad

Kolding IF - half-time state
47% leading24% draw29% trailing
Aarhus Fremad - half-time state
18% leading53% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.65Points per game (1st half)1.06
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.29
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
71%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
47%No goal before half-time59%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per game (2nd half)1.18
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
1.35Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
53%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad
47%No goal after half-time35%
Kolding IFAarhus Fremad

Kolding IF - second-half results

29% W41% D29% L
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 41%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Aarhus Fremad - second-half results

18% W65% D18% L
18
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Kolding IF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.20
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game1.00.2
Average goals per game1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Aarhus Fremad - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kolding IF
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
7
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Aarhus Fremad
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
6
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.71
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kolding IF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Aarhus Fremad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).

Teams vs league

Kolding IFLigaAarhus Fremad
Average goals per game 2.472.80 2.94
Both teams scored 53%57% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%58% 59%
Clean sheets 35%25% 18%
Goal before half-time 76%77% 71%
Goal after half-time 71%81% 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.80
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / game
1.32
Away goals / game
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kolding IFGoalPontus Andy Texel
  2. Aarhus FremadYellow cardKasper Lunding Jakobsen
  3. Kolding IFYellow cardPasco Estrada
  4. Aarhus FremadSubstitutionOn: Magnus Kaastrup LarsenOff: Mathias Nordestgaard Kubel
  5. Aarhus FremadYellow cardFrederik Grube
  6. Kolding IFSubstitutionOn: Jóhannes Kristinn BjarnasonOff: Meinhard Olsen
  7. Aarhus FremadYellow cardMartin Agnarsson
  8. Kolding IFYellow cardMikael Norø Ingebrigtsen
  9. Kolding IFYellow cardMagnus Saaby
  10. Aarhus FremadGoalMartin Agnarsson
  11. Kolding IFYellow cardNemanja Nedić
  12. Aarhus FremadYellow cardBaptiste Rolland
  13. Kolding IFSubstitutionOn: Abdoulie NjaiOff: Pontus Andy Texel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

4.7Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 230%Home wins40%Draws30%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Kolding IF's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Aarhus Fremad. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Aarhus Fremad
2 : 2
Kolding IF

FAQ

What was the result of Kolding IF vs Aarhus Fremad?

The 1st Division match finished Kolding IF 1:1 Aarhus Fremad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kolding IF vs Aarhus Fremad?

Kolding IF score 1.35 goals per game on average and Aarhus Fremad 1.53. The 1st Division average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Kolding IF's matches and 59% of Aarhus Fremad's.

What form are Kolding IF and Aarhus Fremad in?

Over the last 5 games Kolding IF have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Aarhus Fremad 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kolding IF vs Aarhus Fremad?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.