Kongsvinger vs Egersund: match statistics
Kongsvinger vs Egersund: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kongsvinger played against Egersund in First Division (Norway). The game was played on May 1, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.50 points per game. Egersund has 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kongsvinger scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 1.00. Egersund scores 2.33 and allows 0.00. Games in this league average 3.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Kongsvinger's games and 0% of Egersund's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 67%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 77% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.57 per game. Kongsvinger takes 12.3 shots per game, while Egersund takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 75% of its games and scores 1.50 goals per game after halftime. Egersund leads at halftime in 100% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kongsvinger's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Egersund, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.60 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 77% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back Kongsvinger to win: the hosts have a 100% home win rate, averaging 2.5 goals scored and only 0.5 conceded per home match. Egersund impresses with a 100% away win rate, averaging 3.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded, with 74% possession and 23% shot conversion. Quality of chances shown by xG: Kongsvinger records home xG of 1.82 versus Egersund’s away xG of 1.63, while the visitors concede only 0.76 xG per match compared to 1.61 xG conceded by the hosts, suggesting the hosts create slightly better opportunities while Egersund limits risk defensively. In the last 5 matches Kongsvinger scored 14 goals and averages 2.0 points per game, versus Egersund’s 10 goals and 1.8 points per game; the hosts also register more shots on target (6 vs 5) despite a slightly lower conversion rate (19% vs 23%). Therefore I expect an open game with goals at both ends, but the minimal favorite remains the hosts due to a perfect home record and consistent recent form.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
At league level BTTS occurs in 60% of matches, and in the last 5 games Kongsvinger had BTTS in 80% of fixtures while Egersund in 40%, giving a clear, though not uniform, signal in favor of both teams scoring. Both sides possess offensive potential: average xG is 1.54 (Kongsvinger) vs 1.63 (Egersund), and average goals scored in the last 5 matches are 2.8 and 2.0, demonstrating finishing ability. Egersund registers more shots on target (5.0 vs 3.0) and has a higher shot conversion rate (23% vs 13%), increasing the likelihood they will find the hosts’ net at least once. Conversely both teams also concede: average goals conceded in the last 5 matches are 1.8 (Kongsvinger) and 1.2 (Egersund), and recent xG against is 1.46 vs 1.41, so defenses are not watertight. Considering league 60% BTTS, 80% at home vs 40% away, xG 1.54 vs 1.63 and shots/conversion 5.0/23% vs 3.0/13%, I recommend BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 72% vs 28%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goal analysis points to a multi-goal game: in the last 5 matches Kongsvinger has xG 1.53 per game and scored 14 goals (2.8 avg), Egersund has xG 1.30 and scored 10 goals (2.0 avg), totaling roughly 2.83 xG. Additionally the league averages 3.6 goals per game, and in the last 5 matches the Over 2.5 rate was 100% for Kongsvinger and 80% for Egersund, with a league Over 2.5 rate = 77%, which reinforces the chance of over 2.5 goals. From a chances-quality perspective Egersund averages 5 shots on target with a 23% conversion, Kongsvinger 3 shots on target and 13% conversion, so the visitors’ higher efficiency increases scoring risk. Considering combined xG ≈ 2.83, recent scoring tempo (Kongsvinger 2.8 and Egersund 2.0 over the last 5) and the league trend of 3.6 goals/game, the strongest signal is Over 2.5 (hence the 'over' selection).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 2/2 — Egersund (away) lead at the break and ultimately win. The away side average 3.0 goals per match versus 2.0 for the home team, and at half-time they average 2.0 goals compared to Kongsvinger’s 1.5. Supporting this scenario are the xG values: 1.63 for Egersund vs 1.54 for the hosts, a higher number of shots on target (5 vs 3) and a superior shot conversion rate (23.0% vs 13.0%), indicating greater efficiency from the visitors. In the second half the away team also scores more often (AVG_2hg_away 1.0 vs AVG_2hg_home 0.5), so the lead obtained by half-time has a strong chance to be maintained or extended.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kongsvinger | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.63 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Egersund is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.5 pts / game - Kongsvinger · 3 pts / game - Egersund
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 7% better for: goals scored per game.
2.5 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 2.33 goals / game - Egersund
Kongsvinger scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 100% (3 of 3 meczów).
Egersund scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
Over / Under - Egersund
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egersund is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.5 pts / game - Kongsvinger · 3 pts / game - Egersund
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 75%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Egersund - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.50 | 2.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 50% |
| No goal | 25% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 0% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kongsvinger
Egersund
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Kongsvinger | Liga | Egersund | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.50 | 3.60 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 60% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 20% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 87% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kongsvinger's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Egersund. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kongsvinger vs Egersund?
The First Division match finished Kongsvinger 2:1 Egersund. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kongsvinger and Egersund?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kongsvinger won 1, Egersund won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kongsvinger vs Egersund?
Kongsvinger score 2.50 goals per game on average and Egersund 2.33. The First Division average is 3.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Kongsvinger's matches and 0% of Egersund's.
What form are Kongsvinger and Egersund in?
Over the last 5 games Kongsvinger have a 3-1-0 record (2.50 points per game) and Egersund 3-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kongsvinger vs Egersund?
The statistical background for Kongsvinger vs Egersund — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.