Norway - First DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

Kongsvinger vs Egersund: match statistics

Kongsvinger crest
Kongsvinger
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Egersund crest
Egersund

Kongsvinger vs Egersund: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kongsvinger play Egersund in First Division (Norway). The match date is 1 May 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Kongsvinger: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Egersund: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kongsvinger scores 2.57 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Egersund scores 1.71 and concedes 1.79. League average: 3.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kongsvinger 79%, Egersund 50%. Over 2.5: Kongsvinger 86%, Egersund 79%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.41. Kongsvinger: 14.7 shots per match, Egersund: 11.4.

Match halves

Kongsvinger: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.50. Egersund: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Kongsvinger: 46-60 (11 goals). Egersund: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I back Kongsvinger to win: the hosts have a 100% home win rate, averaging 2.5 goals scored and only 0.5 conceded per home match. Egersund impresses with a 100% away win rate, averaging 3.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded, with 74% possession and 23% shot conversion. Quality of chances shown by xG: Kongsvinger records home xG of 1.82 versus Egersund’s away xG of 1.63, while the visitors concede only 0.76 xG per match compared to 1.61 xG conceded by the hosts, suggesting the hosts create slightly better opportunities while Egersund limits risk defensively. In the last 5 matches Kongsvinger scored 14 goals and averages 2.0 points per game, versus Egersund’s 10 goals and 1.8 points per game; the hosts also register more shots on target (6 vs 5) despite a slightly lower conversion rate (19% vs 23%). Therefore I expect an open game with goals at both ends, but the minimal favorite remains the hosts due to a perfect home record and consistent recent form.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
KongsvingerEgersund
13Shots11
KongsvingerEgersund
6Shots on target5
KongsvingerEgersund
1.52xG1.33
KongsvingerEgersund
4Corners6
KongsvingerEgersund
39Dangerous attacks40
KongsvingerEgersund
-1Fouls-1
KongsvingerEgersund
3Cards2
KongsvingerEgersund

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KongsvingerEgersund
2.57Goals scored / match1.71
KongsvingerEgersund
1.5Goals conceded / match1.79
KongsvingerEgersund
54%Average possession52%
KongsvingerEgersund
6.21Shots on target / match3.93
KongsvingerEgersund

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.71Shots per match11.43
KongsvingerEgersund
6.21Shots on target3.93
KongsvingerEgersund
17.5%Shot conversion15%
KongsvingerEgersund
54%Possession52%
KongsvingerEgersund
1.77xG for1.41
KongsvingerEgersund
1.55xG against1.44
KongsvingerEgersund

Shooting quality

Kongsvinger: AttackingEgersund: Efficient finishing
KongsvingerEgersund
Accuracy (shots on target)42%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kongsvinger is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Kongsvinger · 1.2 pts / match - Egersund

Kongsvinger
WWDLW
Season result split
64% W21% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-2
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.2Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Egersund
LLWLW
Season result split
43% W7% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-7
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-5
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kongsvinger is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

2.57 goals / match - Kongsvinger · 1.71 goals / match - Egersund

Kongsvinger is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Kongsvinger · 1.79 goals / match - Egersund

Kongsvinger scoring profile: very strong

Kongsvinger scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Egersund keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

Egersund scoring profile: very strong

Egersund scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

36Goals scored (season)24
KongsvingerEgersund
21Goals conceded (season)25
KongsvingerEgersund
4.07Average goals in match3.5
KongsvingerEgersund
16Goals scored (last 5)11
KongsvingerEgersund
11Goals conceded (last 5)14
KongsvingerEgersund

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal79%
KongsvingerEgersund
86%2 goals50%
KongsvingerEgersund
50%3 goals29%
KongsvingerEgersund
21%4 goals7%
KongsvingerEgersund

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal64%
KongsvingerEgersund
36%2 goals50%
KongsvingerEgersund
14%3 goals36%
KongsvingerEgersund
14%4 goals21%
KongsvingerEgersund

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

36%BTTS at half-time14%
KongsvingerEgersund
7%BTTS in both halves14%
KongsvingerEgersund
50%Scored in both halves36%
KongsvingerEgersund

BTTS and goal count

71%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
KongsvingerEgersund
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
KongsvingerEgersund
100%BTTS - last 560%
KongsvingerEgersund

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

93%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
KongsvingerEgersund
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time64%
KongsvingerEgersund
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KongsvingerEgersund

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
KongsvingerEgersund
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
KongsvingerEgersund
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
KongsvingerEgersund

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Egersund is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Kongsvinger · 1.5 pts / match - Egersund

Kongsvinger - half-time state
43% leading14% draw43% trailing
Egersund - half-time state
43% leading21% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.5
KongsvingerEgersund
1.07Goals scored (1st half)0.93
KongsvingerEgersund
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
KongsvingerEgersund
1.93Average goals (1st half)1.71
KongsvingerEgersund
36%Clean sheet before half-time57%
KongsvingerEgersund
36%No goal before half-time50%
KongsvingerEgersund

After half-time (2nd half)

2.07Points per match (2nd half)1.29
KongsvingerEgersund
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
KongsvingerEgersund
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)1
KongsvingerEgersund
2.14Average goals (2nd half)1.79
KongsvingerEgersund
50%Clean sheet after half-time36%
KongsvingerEgersund
21%No goal after half-time36%
KongsvingerEgersund

Kongsvinger - second-half results

64% W14% R21% P
20
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding149%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Egersund - second-half results

29% W43% R29% P
21
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kongsvinger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.602.40
Goals scored / match1.41.8
Goals conceded / match1.60.6
Average goals in match3.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%40%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Egersund - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.6
Average goals in match2.42.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kongsvinger
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
7
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
11
3
46-60
5
1
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Egersund
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
6
6
31-45
6
5
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kongsvinger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.85
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Egersund

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).

Teams vs league

KongsvingerLigaEgersund
Average goals in match 4.073.75 3.50
Both teams scored 79%60% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 86%73% 79%
Clean sheets 14%21% 36%
Goal before half-time 93%77% 79%
Goal after half-time 93%88% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.75
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.17
Home goals / match
1.58
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kongsvinger 1 - 1 - 0 Egersund. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Kongsvinger IL
2 : 1
Egersunds IK
Egersunds IK
2 : 2
Kongsvinger IL

FAQ

What was the result of Kongsvinger vs Egersund?

The First Division match finished Kongsvinger 2:1 Egersund. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kongsvinger and Egersund?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kongsvinger won 1, Egersund won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kongsvinger vs Egersund?

Kongsvinger score 2.57 goals per game on average and Egersund 1.71. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Kongsvinger's matches and 50% of Egersund's.

What form are Kongsvinger and Egersund in?

Over the last 5 games Kongsvinger have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Egersund 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kongsvinger vs Egersund?

The statistical background for Kongsvinger vs Egersund — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.