Kongsvinger vs Lyn: match statistics
Kongsvinger vs Lyn: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kongsvinger played against Lyn in First Division (Norway). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Gjemselund Stadion. Final score: 4:4.
Recent form
Kongsvinger has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Lyn has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Kongsvinger scores 2.58 goals per game and allows 1.47. Lyn scores 1.63 and allows 2.05. Games in this league average 3.84 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 79% of Kongsvinger's games and 53% of Lyn's. The Over 2.5 rates are 84% and 74%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 74% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.47 per game. Kongsvinger takes 14.1 shots per game, while Lyn takes 11.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 47% of its games and scores 1.53 goals per game after halftime. Lyn leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kongsvinger's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (12 goals). For Lyn, it is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.84 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 74% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger are exceptionally strong at home: they win 78% of their matches, score an average of 3.00 goals per game, and have never finished a home match without scoring. The hosts also create significantly better chances, as reflected by their average xG of 1.92 compared with Lyn’s 1.43. They additionally record 15.89 shots and 6 shots on target per match, while the visitors average 11 and 4.5, respectively. Lyn lose as many as 50% of their away matches, score just 1.38 goals on average, and fail to find the net in 25% of such outings. Both teams have been prolific recently — Kongsvinger scored 26 goals in five matches, while Lyn netted 16 — but the hosts won 4 of those 5 games and have a considerably stronger home profile. Kongsvinger’s defense allows opponents an average xG of 1.47, lower than Lyn’s away figure of 1.86, which further supports a home win in a match featuring several goals.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by very strong current scoring form: Kongsvinger have averaged 5.2 goals in their last five matches, while Lyn have averaged 3.2. Over the same period, both teams have regularly allowed opponents chances, conceding 1.8 and 1.6 goals per match respectively, while BTTS landed in 100% of Kongsvinger’s last five matches and 80% of Lyn’s. The hosts have an exceptionally poor clean-sheet record, at just 10%, while their opponents create an average of 1.43 xG, which should give Lyn a realistic chance of scoring. Kongsvinger, in turn, score an average of 1.8 goals at home, while Lyn concede 1.63 away from home, and both teams average 4.5 shots on target per match. The seasonal 50% BTTS rate for both sides lowers confidence in the prediction, but recent results, the league’s high scoring rate of 3.85 goals per match, and the hosts’ defensive numbers clearly tilt the assessment towards a Goal/Goal scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kongsvinger average 1.80 goals, while Lyn concede 1.63, and the hosts have a very weak defense, averaging 2.50 goals conceded per match. Their attacking potential is confirmed by the xG figures: 1.51 for Kongsvinger and 1.43 for Lyn, with the opponents’ xG conceded standing at 1.86 and 1.78, respectively. In their last five matches, both teams recorded a high percentage of games with at least three goals: 100% for Kongsvinger and 80% for Lyn. Across the entire season, the 1.5-goal line was also surpassed in 90% of Kongsvinger’s matches and 75% of Lyn’s games. Over 1.5 is therefore the strongest pick, as just two goals are required for the bet to land, while the defensive profiles of both teams and their current form clearly point towards an open game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Lyn have a strong first-half signal: in their last five matches, they were leading at the break in 80% of games, scoring an average of 2.2 goals before half-time, while Kongsvinger conceded just 0.4 goals during that period. Over the course of the season, the visitors have also rarely been behind at half-time, losing the first half in only 13% of matches, whereas the hosts were trailing after 45 minutes in as many as 40% of their games. Kongsvinger have a clear problem after the break, averaging just 0.3 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, and losing the second half in 80% of matches. Lyn score 0.63 goals per game after half-time and have shown greater defensive efficiency across the season, recording clean sheets in 38% of matches compared with 10% for the hosts. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is 2/2, with the visitors leading at the break and securing the win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kongsvinger | Lyn | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kongsvinger is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Kongsvinger · 2 pts / game - Lyn
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 58% better for: goals scored per game.
2.58 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 1.63 goals / game - Lyn
Kongsvinger is 39% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.47 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 2.05 goals / game - Lyn
Kongsvinger scores in 95% of games (18 of 19 games), while Lyn keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 games).
Lyn scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 games), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
Over / Under - Lyn
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.63 pts / game - Kongsvinger · 1.47 pts / game - Lyn
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 47% of games and wins 68%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Lyn - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 37%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +10 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kongsvinger
Lyn
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Kongsvinger | Liga | Lyn | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.05 | 3.84 | ▼ 3.68 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 63% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 84% | 74% | • 74% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 20% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 76% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | • 89% | 88% | ▼ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kongsvinger's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Lyn. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kongsvinger vs Lyn?
The First Division match finished Kongsvinger 4:4 Lyn. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kongsvinger and Lyn?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kongsvinger won 3, Lyn won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kongsvinger vs Lyn?
Kongsvinger score 2.58 goals per game on average and Lyn 1.63. The First Division average is 3.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 74% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Kongsvinger's matches and 53% of Lyn's.
What form are Kongsvinger and Lyn in?
Over the last 5 games Kongsvinger have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Lyn 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kongsvinger vs Lyn?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kongsvinger vs Lyn: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


