Kongsvinger vs Ranheim: match statistics
Kongsvinger vs Ranheim: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kongsvinger played against Ranheim in First Division (Norway). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: Gjemselund Stadion. Final score: 6:2.
Recent form
Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Ranheim has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Kongsvinger scores 2.92 goals per game and allows 1.46. Ranheim scores 2.54 and allows 2.42. Games in this league average 3.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 79% of Kongsvinger's games and 83% of Ranheim's. The Over 2.5 rates are 79% and 92%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kongsvinger has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.67 per game. Kongsvinger takes 13.8 shots per game, while Ranheim takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.75 goals per game after halftime. Ranheim leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kongsvinger's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (19 goals). For Ranheim, it is minutes 46-60 (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.82 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kongsvinger are 2nd in the table and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 20 goals in that run; Ranheim have also avoided defeat over the same period, but have won 3 matches and scored 14 goals. Home advantage is clear: the hosts have won 75% of their home matches, while Ranheim have lost 64% of their away games. Kongsvinger average 3.75 goals and 6.75 shots on target per home match, while the visitors concede an average of 2.73 goals away from home. The difference in chance quality also favors the hosts: their home xG stands at 1.98, compared with Ranheim’s away xG of 1.44. However, the visitors average 2 goals away from home, and Kongsvinger concede 1.75 at home, so Ranheim finding the net is a realistic possibility. Even so, the overall statistics point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A scenario in which both teams score is clearly more likely: BTTS landed in 85% of Kongsvinger’s home matches and 82% of Ranheim’s away matches, compared with 63% across the league. The hosts average 3.0 goals scored at home, while the visitors concede 2.73 on the road; conversely, Ranheim average 2.0 goals scored, while Kongsvinger concede 2.15. In addition, Ranheim have yet to keep a clean sheet away from home, and Kongsvinger have not finished a home match without scoring. Recent defensive improvement warrants some caution: over their previous five matches, the teams conceded an average of 1.0 and 0.8 goals respectively, with BTTS landing in 80% and 60% of those games. Even so, the combination of potent attacks and season-long BTTS records makes BTTS - Yes the stronger pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
More than 2.5 goals have been scored in 92% of Kongsvinger matches and 91% of Ranheim matches, providing a strong case for at least three goals. The hosts average 3.0 goals scored, while the visitors concede 2.73; additionally, Kongsvinger’s xG is 1.86, compared with 1.88 xG conceded by Ranheim. The visitors also have a good chance of finding the net: they average 2.0 goals scored, while Kongsvinger concede 2.15, and both teams have scored in 85% and 82% of their matches, respectively. Across their last five games, Kongsvinger averaged 4.0 goals and Ranheim 2.8, although only 60% of matches for each team went over the 2.5 line. Over 2.5 goals therefore remains the best pick, but the 85% forecast should be treated with more caution than the season-long percentages alone.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Kongsvinger have led at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.6 goals in the first half, while Ranheim have averaged 1.0. The hosts also hold the attacking edge over the season: their average xG is 1.86 compared with the visitors’ 1.44, and they average 3.0 goals scored versus 2.0. Their post-break performance also supports the prospect of holding the lead: Kongsvinger average 1.77 goals after half-time, while Ranheim concede 1.82. However, the visitors have won the second half in all of their last 5 matches, so a turnaround cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, the hosts’ stronger start and season-long advantage make leading at half-time and winning at full-time the most likely scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kongsvinger | Ranheim | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.49 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kongsvinger is 38% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Kongsvinger · 1.6 pts / game - Ranheim
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
2.92 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 2.54 goals / game - Ranheim
Kongsvinger is 66% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.46 goals / game - Kongsvinger · 2.42 goals / game - Ranheim
Kongsvinger scores in 96% of games (23 of 24 games), while Ranheim keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 24 games).
Ranheim scores in 92% of games (22 of 24 games), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
Over / Under - Ranheim
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.71 pts / game - Kongsvinger · 1.21 pts / game - Ranheim
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ranheim - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +10 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (19 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kongsvinger
Ranheim
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Kongsvinger | Liga | Ranheim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.38 | 3.82 | ▲ 4.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 63% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 79% | 71% | ▲ 92% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 19% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 77% | ▲ 96% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 90% | ▲ 96% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kongsvinger's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Ranheim. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kongsvinger vs Ranheim?
The First Division match finished Kongsvinger 6:2 Ranheim. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kongsvinger and Ranheim?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kongsvinger won 0, Ranheim won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kongsvinger vs Ranheim?
Kongsvinger score 2.92 goals per game on average and Ranheim 2.54. The First Division average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Kongsvinger's matches and 83% of Ranheim's.
What form are Kongsvinger and Ranheim in?
Over the last 5 games Kongsvinger have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Ranheim 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kongsvinger vs Ranheim?
The statistical background for Kongsvinger vs Ranheim — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.