Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildData current as of 22 July 2026

KR vs FH: match statistics

KR crest
KR
4 : 2half-time 4:2
FH crest
FH

KR vs FH: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KR play FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 27 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 4:2.

Current form

KR: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. FH: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KR scores 3.63 and concedes 2.25 goals per match. FH scores 1.33 and concedes 2.07. League average: 4.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KR 88%, FH 67%. Over 2.5: KR 94%, FH 60%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

KR has higher xG: 2.54 vs 1.72. KR: 21.9 shots per match, FH: 13.6.

Match halves

KR: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 1.81. FH: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

KR: 76-90+ (11 goals). FH: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 4.04 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

The favorite is KR: at home they average 4 goals per match (average xG 2.21) and have won all 3 home matches so far (100% wins), while FH scores on average 1 goal away (xG 1.66) and has no away wins yet (0% wins). KR averages 18.5 shots per match with 10.5 on target and has a conversion rate of 22%, whereas FH on the road records 13.33 shots and 5.33 on target with an 8% conversion, which translates into a clear home advantage in chance quality. Defensively FH concedes 2.33 goals on average away with xGAgainst 1.87, while KR at home concedes 2.00 goals with xGAgainst 0.93, so the hosts allow fewer expected opponent chances. Form supports the edge: KR has 4 wins and 1 draw in the last 5 matches with an average of 2.6 points per game, while FH has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses with 1.4 points per game; additionally FH fail to score in 33% of away matches, whereas KR do not fail at home (0% FTS). I assign probabilities of approximately 75% for the hosts, 15% for a draw and 10% for the visitors.

Half-by-half

4 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
KRFH
21Shots9
KRFH
11Shots on target5
KRFH
2.72xG1.19
KRFH
16Corners3
KRFH
88Dangerous attacks36
KRFH
14Fouls12
KRFH
2Cards6
KRFH

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

3.63Goals scored / match1.33
KRFH
2.25Goals conceded / match2.07
KRFH

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

21.94Shots per match13.6
KRFH
9.06Shots on target5.13
KRFH
16.5%Shot conversion9.8%
KRFH
62%Possession44%
KRFH
2.54xG for1.72
KRFH
1.46xG against1.95
KRFH

Shooting quality

KR: DominantFH: Balanced
KRFH
Accuracy (shots on target)41%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KR is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KR · 1.4 pts / match - FH

KR
WLDWW
Season result split
69% W13% R19% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-2-3
2.19 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-1-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 4.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 2.99Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
FH
DDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
13% W40% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-7
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.13Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KR is 173% better for: goals scored per match.

3.63 goals / match - KR · 1.33 goals / match - FH

FH is 9% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.25 goals / match - KR · 2.07 goals / match - FH

KR scoring profile: very strong

KR scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).

FH scoring profile: very strong

FH scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while KR keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).

58Goals scored (season)20
KRFH
36Goals conceded (season)31
KRFH
5.88Average goals in match3.4
KRFH
20Goals scored (last 5)6
KRFH
11Goals conceded (last 5)4
KRFH

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal73%
KRFH
94%2 goals47%
KRFH
81%3 goals13%
KRFH
50%4 goals0%
KRFH

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal87%
KRFH
81%2 goals53%
KRFH
31%3 goals40%
KRFH
6%4 goals20%
KRFH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

44%BTTS at half-time27%
KRFH
31%BTTS in both halves7%
KRFH
81%Scored in both halves7%
KRFH

BTTS and goal count

88%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
KRFH
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
KRFH
80%BTTS - last 560%
KRFH

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
KRFH
88%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
KRFH
44%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
KRFH

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
KRFH
88%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
KRFH
69%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
KRFH

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KR is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.88 pts / match - KR · 1.33 pts / match - FH

KR - half-time state
56% leading19% draw25% trailing
FH - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.88Points per match (1st half)1.33
KRFH
1.81Goals scored (1st half)0.87
KRFH
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)1.07
KRFH
2.88Average goals (1st half)1.93
KRFH
44%Clean sheet before half-time47%
KRFH
13%No goal before half-time47%
KRFH

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per match (2nd half)0.87
KRFH
1.81Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
KRFH
1.19Goals conceded (2nd half)1
KRFH
3Average goals (2nd half)1.47
KRFH
25%Clean sheet after half-time40%
KRFH
13%No goal after half-time73%
KRFH

KR - second-half results

44% W31% R25% P
30
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

FH - second-half results

20% W27% R53% P
20
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding39%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KR - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.40
Goals scored / match1.62.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match3.03.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals60%80%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+1+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 8
FH - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KR
ScoredConceded
10
9
0-15
10
2
16-30
9
6
31-45
8
5
46-60
10
5
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

FH
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.8 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
78%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KR

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

FH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KRLigaFH
Average goals in match 5.884.04 3.40
Both teams scored 88%74% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 94%73% 60%
Clean sheets 6%14% 13%
Goal before half-time 100%82% 80%
Goal after half-time 94%88% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.04
Average goals per match
74%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.21
Home goals / match
1.84
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
65%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KR 1 - 1 - 0 FH. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KR Reykjavík
3 : 2
FH Hafnarfjördur
FH Hafnarfjördur
2 : 2
KR Reykjavík

FAQ

What was the result of KR vs FH?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KR 4:2 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KR and FH?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KR won 1, FH won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KR vs FH?

KR score 3.63 goals per game on average and FH 1.33. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 88% of KR's matches and 67% of FH's.

What form are KR and FH in?

Over the last 5 games KR have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and FH 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KR vs FH?

The statistical background for KR vs FH — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.