KR vs ÍA: match statistics
KR vs ÍA: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KR played against ÍA in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on June 22, 2026. Venue: Alvogenvöllurinn. Final score: 5:3.
Recent form
KR has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. ÍA has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
KR scores 3.45 goals per game and allows 2.27. ÍA scores 1.30 and allows 1.60. Games in this league average 3.99 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 91% of KR's games and 60% of ÍA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 91% and 60%, compared with league averages of 72% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KR has the higher season xG average, 2.33 to 1.68 per game. KR takes 19.2 shots per game, while ÍA takes 14.1.
First-half and second-half trends
KR leads at halftime in 64% of its games and scores 1.55 goals per game after halftime. ÍA leads at halftime in 30% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
KR's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (8 goals). For ÍA, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 3.99 goals. Both teams score in 72% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KR has a clear offensive edge at home: they average 3.67 goals per home match, 19.67 shots and 9.5 shots on target with an average xG of 2.39, while ÍA on the road records 1.33 goals, 12.83 shots and 5 on target with xG 1.55. The home side’s finishing efficiency is higher (conversion rate 19% vs 10% for ÍA) and KR has never finished a home match without scoring (share of matches without a goal 0% vs 33% for the visitors). At the same time KR’s defense is vulnerable to conceding — the hosts concede 2.00 goals at home on average and have allowed 14 goals in the last 5 matches, whereas ÍA conceded 5 goals in their last 5 fixtures and concedes 1.67 goals on average away. Recent form shows ÍA has a better points record (KR 2-1-2 in the last 5, 1.4 points per game vs ÍA 3-1-1 and 2.0 points per game), but the superiority of KR’s chance quality at home and their higher efficiency argue in favor of a KR win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics strongly favor BTTS: KR has a seasonal BTTS rate of 75% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while ÍA has a seasonal BTTS rate of 50% and 60% in the last 5 matches, which provides a clear signal for both teams to score. In chance creation KR generates 1.88 xG per match against ÍA’s average xG conceded of 1.63, and ÍA has 1.55 xG versus KR’s average xG conceded of 1.44, so both teams have realistic chances of scoring. KR has scored 38 and conceded 25 this season, ÍA has 13 goals scored and 16 conceded, and the league percentage of matches with goals from both teams is 71% with an average of 4.05 goals per match — this further supports the BTTS scenario. Clean sheets are rare (KR 25%, ÍA 17%) and in the last 5 rounds KR averaged 2.6 goals scored and 2.8 conceded, while ÍA averaged 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded, which suggests games with goals at both ends. Based on these specific figures I assign 74% to BTTS 'Yes' and 26% to BTTS 'No' as the top tip.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model indicates total expected goals of 3.26: 1.76 for KR and 1.50 for ÍA, which points toward an "Over" selection. KR produces on average 1.88 xG with 16.0 shots and 5.75 on target, while ÍA has 1.55 xG with 12.83 shots; additionally ÍA concedes 1.63 xG and allows 1.67 goals per match on average, increasing goal probability. In the last 5 matches KR averaged 2.6 goals, ÍA 1.4 goals (4.0 goals combined per match), and KR has 75% of matches with both teams scoring (ÍA 50%), confirming offensive momentum. Season metrics show Over 1.5 in 75% of KR’s matches and 67% of ÍA’s, and Over 2.5 in 50%/67% of cases, so I rate Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (92%), while Over 2.5 also remains attractive (72%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The forecast indicates the home side leading at half-time with the away team winning after 90 minutes (HT/FT = 1/2). Homes led at the break in 50% of matches this season versus 17% for ÍA, and in the last five games they averaged 1.6 goals by half-time compared to 0.4 for the visitors (14 HT goals vs 2), strongly favoring KR taking the lead at 45 minutes. Conversely, ÍA has a higher season-long points-per-game average, 1.67 versus the hosts’ 1.25, and wins 50% of matches this season compared to KR’s 25%, giving them greater chances of a favorable full-time result. Additionally, the visitors are more effective after the break – in the last five matches they average 1.2 points post-half-time versus 0.4 for the hosts, and they scored 4 goals in minutes 46–60 compared to 2 for the hosts, so they have a realistic possibility of a turnaround despite KR’s lead at the interval. At the same time, the homes’ xG of 1.88 versus 1.55 for the visitors shows KR create more chances earlier, but ÍA’s scoring advantage and second-half performance make the 1/2 scenario the strongest.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KR | ÍA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
ÍA is 43% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - KR · 2 pts / game - ÍA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KR is 165% better for: goals scored per game.
3.45 goals / game - KR · 1.3 goals / game - ÍA
ÍA is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.27 goals / game - KR · 1.6 goals / game - ÍA
KR scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 meczów), while ÍA keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).
ÍA scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 meczów), while KR keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KR
Over / Under - ÍA
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KR is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - KR · 1.3 pts / game - ÍA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KR - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 64% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
ÍA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KR
ÍA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| KR | Liga | ÍA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 5.73 | 3.99 | ▼ 2.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 91% | 72% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 91% | 72% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 15% | ▲ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 88% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KR's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against ÍA. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KR vs ÍA?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished KR 5:3 ÍA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KR and ÍA?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KR won 1, ÍA won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KR vs ÍA?
KR score 3.45 goals per game on average and ÍA 1.30. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 91% of KR's matches and 60% of ÍA's.
What form are KR and ÍA in?
Over the last 5 games KR have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and ÍA 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KR vs ÍA?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.