Belgium - First Division BData current as of September 11, 2026

KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: match statistics

KRC Genk II crest
KRC Genk II
2 : 0half-time 0:0
AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
125%(3.30)
X25%(3.57)
250%(1.92)

AS Eupen appears to be the decided favorite for this encounter. KRC Genk II sits in 15th place in the table with a disastrous home record – 70% losses at home and barely 20% wins. The hosts are in fatal form, having not won any of their last 5 matches and conceding an average of 2.2 goals per game at home. AS Eupen (7th place) presents significantly higher quality, especially in away matches, where they achieve 36% wins and only 9% of matches without scoring goals. The visitors have better effectiveness (16% vs 11%), a higher xG average (1.11 vs 1.17 for the hosts, but with significantly better defense), and maintain 36% clean sheets on the road. Considering the goal difference (-10 for the hosts, +2 for the visitors in their matches) and the recent results of both teams, a victory for AS Eupen is the most probable scenario.

KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KRC Genk II played against AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on January 30, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

KRC Genk II has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. AS Eupen has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

KRC Genk II scores 1.10 goals per game and allows 2.05. AS Eupen scores 1.43 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 65% of KRC Genk II's games and 62% of AS Eupen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 52%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KRC Genk II has the higher season xG average, 1.21 to 1.17 per game. KRC Genk II takes 10.8 shots per game, while AS Eupen takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

KRC Genk II leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.45 goals per game after halftime. AS Eupen leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.71 after halftime.

When the teams score

KRC Genk II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For AS Eupen, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AS Eupen appears to be the decided favorite for this encounter. KRC Genk II sits in 15th place in the table with a disastrous home record – 70% losses at home and barely 20% wins. The hosts are in fatal form, having not won any of their last 5 matches and conceding an average of 2.2 goals per game at home. AS Eupen (7th place) presents significantly higher quality, especially in away matches, where they achieve 36% wins and only 9% of matches without scoring goals. The visitors have better effectiveness (16% vs 11%), a higher xG average (1.11 vs 1.17 for the hosts, but with significantly better defense), and maintain 36% clean sheets on the road. Considering the goal difference (-10 for the hosts, +2 for the visitors in their matches) and the recent results of both teams, a victory for AS Eupen is the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
20Shots14
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
4Shots on target2
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.93xG1.23
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
9Corners5
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
55Dangerous attacks29
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
13Fouls15
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0Cards2
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.1Goals scored / game1.43
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
2.05Goals allowed / game1.19
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
48%Average possession52%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3.65Shots on target / game3.95
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.8Shots per game9.86
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3.65Shots on target3.95
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
10.2%Shot conversion14.5%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
48%Possession52%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.21xG for1.17
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.81xG against1.67
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Shooting quality

KRC Genk II: BalancedAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)34%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

AS Eupen is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - KRC Genk II · 1 pts / game - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-12
0.80 pts / game · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
AS Eupen
WDLLD
Season result split
38% W33% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-6
1.48 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 30% better for: goals scored per game.

1.1 goals / game - KRC Genk II · 1.43 goals / game - AS Eupen

AS Eupen is 72% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.05 goals / game - KRC Genk II · 1.19 goals / game - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II scoring profile: strong

KRC Genk II scores in 65% of games (13 of 20 meczów), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 meczów).

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 90% of games (19 of 21 meczów), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 meczów).

22Goals scored (season)30
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
41Goals conceded (season)25
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3.15Average goals per game2.62
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
4Goals scored (last 5)7
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
12Goals conceded (last 5)8
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal90%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
30%2 goals43%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
15%3 goals10%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0%4 goals0%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal67%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
65%2 goals38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
25%3 goals14%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
20%4 goals0%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time14%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
5%BTTS in both halves5%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
20%Scored in both halves14%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
60%BTTS - last 580%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / game - KRC Genk II · 1.38 pts / game - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II - half-time state
25% leading35% draw40% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)1.38
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.71
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.55Average goals (1st half)1.33
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
35%Clean sheet before half-time57%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
55%No goal before half-time52%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.65Points per game (2nd half)1.62
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.15Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.29
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
30%Clean sheet after half-time57%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
60%No goal after half-time43%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

KRC Genk II - second-half results

10% W35% D55% L
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 20%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AS Eupen - second-half results

43% W33% D24% L
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KRC Genk II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.20
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.81.6
Average goals per game1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
AS Eupen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KRC Genk II
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
9
31-45
2
6
46-60
5
7
61-75
2
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
7
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KRC Genk II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KRC Genk IILigaAS Eupen
Average goals per game 3.152.76 2.62
Both teams scored 65%53% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%51% 52%
Clean sheets 10%27% 33%
Goal before half-time 80%72% 76%
Goal after half-time 80%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AS EupenYellow cardIsaac Nuhu
  2. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Nathan BitumazalaOff: Logan Delaurier-Chaubet
  3. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Alpha Amadou BarryOff: Emmanuel Jeriel Sarfo
  4. AS EupenYellow cardGabriel Bares
  5. KRC Genk IIGoalJonathan CoenenAssist: Myung-Jun Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Anaik JacobyMatches officiated: 19
4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 232%Home wins26%Draws42%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from KRC Genk II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against AS Eupen. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

KAS Eupen
2 : 1
Jong KRC Genk

FAQ

What was the result of KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

The First Division B match finished KRC Genk II 2:0 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

KRC Genk II score 1.10 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.43. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 65% of KRC Genk II's matches and 62% of AS Eupen's.

What form are KRC Genk II and AS Eupen in?

Over the last 5 games KRC Genk II have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and AS Eupen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.