Belgium - First Division BData current as of 19 July 2026

KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: match statistics

KRC Genk II crest
KRC Genk II
2 : 0half-time 0:0
AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
125%(3.30)
X25%(3.57)
250%(1.92)

AS Eupen appears to be the decided favorite for this encounter. KRC Genk II sits in 15th place in the table with a disastrous home record – 70% losses at home and barely 20% wins. The hosts are in fatal form, having not won any of their last 5 matches and conceding an average of 2.2 goals per game at home. AS Eupen (7th place) presents significantly higher quality, especially in away matches, where they achieve 36% wins and only 9% of matches without scoring goals. The visitors have better effectiveness (16% vs 11%), a higher xG average (1.11 vs 1.17 for the hosts, but with significantly better defense), and maintain 36% clean sheets on the road. Considering the goal difference (-10 for the hosts, +2 for the visitors in their matches) and the recent results of both teams, a victory for AS Eupen is the most probable scenario.

KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KRC Genk II play AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 30 January 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

KRC Genk II: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. AS Eupen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KRC Genk II scores 1.31 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. AS Eupen scores 1.38 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KRC Genk II 66%, AS Eupen 53%. Over 2.5: KRC Genk II 63%, AS Eupen 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

KRC Genk II has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.21. KRC Genk II: 12.8 shots per match, AS Eupen: 10.5.

Match halves

KRC Genk II: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.66. AS Eupen: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

KRC Genk II: 31-45+ (11 goals). AS Eupen: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

AS Eupen appears to be the decided favorite for this encounter. KRC Genk II sits in 15th place in the table with a disastrous home record – 70% losses at home and barely 20% wins. The hosts are in fatal form, having not won any of their last 5 matches and conceding an average of 2.2 goals per game at home. AS Eupen (7th place) presents significantly higher quality, especially in away matches, where they achieve 36% wins and only 9% of matches without scoring goals. The visitors have better effectiveness (16% vs 11%), a higher xG average (1.11 vs 1.17 for the hosts, but with significantly better defense), and maintain 36% clean sheets on the road. Considering the goal difference (-10 for the hosts, +2 for the visitors in their matches) and the recent results of both teams, a victory for AS Eupen is the most probable scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
20Shots14
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
4Shots on target2
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.93xG1.23
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
9Corners5
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
55Dangerous attacks29
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
13Fouls15
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0Cards2
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.31Goals scored / match1.38
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.84Goals conceded / match1.13
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
50%Average possession52%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
4.38Shots on target / match3.81
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.81Shots per match10.5
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
4.38Shots on target3.81
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
10.2%Shot conversion13.1%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
50%Possession52%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.42xG for1.21
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.62xG against1.61
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Shooting quality

KRC Genk II: BalancedAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)34%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AS Eupen is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - KRC Genk II · 1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
22% W31% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-10-15
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-8
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
WLDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
AS Eupen
WDWDL
Season result split
38% W34% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.31 goals / match - KRC Genk II · 1.38 goals / match - AS Eupen

AS Eupen is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.84 goals / match - KRC Genk II · 1.13 goals / match - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II scoring profile: strong

KRC Genk II scores in 72% of matches (23 of 32 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 32 matches).

42Goals scored (season)44
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
59Goals conceded (season)36
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3.16Average goals in match2.5
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
9Goals scored (last 5)6
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal84%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
44%2 goals38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
13%3 goals13%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3%4 goals3%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal63%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
59%2 goals38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
22%3 goals13%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
16%4 goals0%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time16%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
16%BTTS in both halves6%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
25%Scored in both halves16%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
100%BTTS - last 540%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - KRC Genk II · 1.5 pts / match - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II - half-time state
22% leading41% draw38% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.5
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.66Goals scored (1st half)0.72
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.25
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
41%Clean sheet before half-time59%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
53%No goal before half-time50%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.44
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.66Average goals (2nd half)1.25
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
34%Clean sheet after half-time59%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
50%No goal after half-time50%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

KRC Genk II - second-half results

19% W44% R38% P
34
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AS Eupen - second-half results

34% W41% R25% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KRC Genk II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KRC Genk II
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
4
7
16-30
11
10
31-45
5
9
46-60
6
12
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
9
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KRC Genk II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KRC Genk IILigaAS Eupen
Average goals in match 3.162.84 2.50
Both teams scored 66%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%54% 47%
Clean sheets 16%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 78%79% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KRC Genk II 0 - 0 - 1 AS Eupen. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KAS Eupen
2 : 1
Jong KRC Genk

FAQ

What was the result of KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

The First Division B match finished KRC Genk II 2:0 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

KRC Genk II score 1.31 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.38. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 66% of KRC Genk II's matches and 53% of AS Eupen's.

What form are KRC Genk II and AS Eupen in?

Over the last 5 games KRC Genk II have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.