Belgium - First Division BData current as of September 06, 2026

KRC Genk II vs Lommel United: match statistics

KRC Genk II crest
KRC Genk II
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Lommel United crest
Lommel United
120%(3.70)
X25%(3.90)
255%(1.70)

Lommel United presents decidedly higher form and quality, sitting in 4th place with 9 wins this season, while KRC Genk II ranks 14th with just 4 wins. The visitors boast impressive offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 2.2 goals per away match with 55% possession, significantly outperforming the hosts (1.5 goals, 48% possession). The form of both teams in the last 5 matches clearly favors Lommel (4 wins, 2.4 points per game) compared to KRC Genk II (1 win, 0.8 points per game). The hosts concede an average of 2.25 goals in home matches with only a 25% win rate, which, given the visitors' defensive solidity (30% clean sheets away), gives Lommel United a clear advantage. The difference in expected goals (xG For: 1.7 vs 1.02) and goal difference (+5 vs -6) further confirm the visitors' edge in this clash.

KRC Genk II vs Lommel United: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KRC Genk II played against Lommel United in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on January 16, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

KRC Genk II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Lommel United has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

KRC Genk II scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 1.94. Lommel United scores 2.11 and allows 1.56. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 71% of KRC Genk II's games and 67% of Lommel United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 72%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Lommel United has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.13 per game. KRC Genk II takes 10.1 shots per game, while Lommel United takes 15.2.

First-half and second-half trends

KRC Genk II leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.53 goals per game after halftime. Lommel United leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.22 after halftime.

When the teams score

KRC Genk II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Lommel United, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

First Division B games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lommel United presents decidedly higher form and quality, sitting in 4th place with 9 wins this season, while KRC Genk II ranks 14th with just 4 wins. The visitors boast impressive offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 2.2 goals per away match with 55% possession, significantly outperforming the hosts (1.5 goals, 48% possession). The form of both teams in the last 5 matches clearly favors Lommel (4 wins, 2.4 points per game) compared to KRC Genk II (1 win, 0.8 points per game). The hosts concede an average of 2.25 goals in home matches with only a 25% win rate, which, given the visitors' defensive solidity (30% clean sheets away), gives Lommel United a clear advantage. The difference in expected goals (xG For: 1.7 vs 1.02) and goal difference (+5 vs -6) further confirm the visitors' edge in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
KRC Genk IILommel United
15Shots11
KRC Genk IILommel United
2Shots on target6
KRC Genk IILommel United
1.4xG1.52
KRC Genk IILommel United
6Corners10
KRC Genk IILommel United
43Dangerous attacks55
KRC Genk IILommel United
7Fouls8
KRC Genk IILommel United
0Cards0
KRC Genk IILommel United

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

KRC Genk IILommel United
1.24Goals scored / game2.11
KRC Genk IILommel United
1.94Goals allowed / game1.56
KRC Genk IILommel United
46%Average possession55%
KRC Genk IILommel United
3.65Shots on target / game6.11
KRC Genk IILommel United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.12Shots per game15.22
KRC Genk IILommel United
3.65Shots on target6.11
KRC Genk IILommel United
12.2%Shot conversion13.9%
KRC Genk IILommel United
46%Possession55%
KRC Genk IILommel United
1.13xG for1.73
KRC Genk IILommel United
1.87xG against1.4
KRC Genk IILommel United

Shooting quality

KRC Genk II: Counter-attackingLommel United: Dominant
KRC Genk IILommel United
Accuracy (shots on target)36%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lommel United is 200% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - KRC Genk II · 2.4 pts / game - Lommel United

KRC Genk II
LLWDL
Season result split
24% W24% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-9
0.94 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Lommel United
LWWWW
Season result split
50% W28% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-4
1.78 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lommel United is 70% better for: goals scored per game.

1.24 goals / game - KRC Genk II · 2.11 goals / game - Lommel United

Lommel United is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.94 goals / game - KRC Genk II · 1.56 goals / game - Lommel United

KRC Genk II scoring profile: strong

KRC Genk II scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 meczów), while Lommel United keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 meczów).

Lommel United scoring profile: very strong

Lommel United scores in 89% of games (16 of 18 meczów), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 meczów).

21Goals scored (season)38
KRC Genk IILommel United
33Goals conceded (season)28
KRC Genk IILommel United
3.18Average goals per game3.67
KRC Genk IILommel United
10Goals scored (last 5)12
KRC Genk IILommel United
12Goals conceded (last 5)9
KRC Genk IILommel United

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal89%
KRC Genk IILommel United
35%2 goals78%
KRC Genk IILommel United
18%3 goals33%
KRC Genk IILommel United
0%4 goals11%
KRC Genk IILommel United

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal72%
KRC Genk IILommel United
59%2 goals50%
KRC Genk IILommel United
24%3 goals22%
KRC Genk IILommel United
18%4 goals11%
KRC Genk IILommel United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time39%
KRC Genk IILommel United
6%BTTS in both halves22%
KRC Genk IILommel United
24%Scored in both halves56%
KRC Genk IILommel United

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
KRC Genk IILommel United
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
KRC Genk IILommel United
100%BTTS - last 580%
KRC Genk IILommel United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
KRC Genk IILommel United
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
KRC Genk IILommel United
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
KRC Genk IILommel United

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
KRC Genk IILommel United
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
KRC Genk IILommel United
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
KRC Genk IILommel United

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lommel United is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / game - KRC Genk II · 1.39 pts / game - Lommel United

KRC Genk II - half-time state
29% leading29% draw41% trailing
Lommel United - half-time state
33% leading39% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per game (1st half)1.39
KRC Genk IILommel United
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.89
KRC Genk IILommel United
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
KRC Genk IILommel United
1.59Average goals (1st half)1.67
KRC Genk IILommel United
35%Clean sheet before half-time39%
KRC Genk IILommel United
53%No goal before half-time33%
KRC Genk IILommel United

After half-time (2nd half)

0.71Points per game (2nd half)1.83
KRC Genk IILommel United
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)1.22
KRC Genk IILommel United
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
KRC Genk IILommel United
1.59Average goals (2nd half)2
KRC Genk IILommel United
29%Clean sheet after half-time50%
KRC Genk IILommel United
53%No goal after half-time22%
KRC Genk IILommel United

KRC Genk II - second-half results

12% W35% R53% P
20
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding83%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 24%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Lommel United - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
25
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

KRC Genk II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.20
Goals scored / game1.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.6
Average goals per game2.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Lommel United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game1.60.8
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game2.81.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KRC Genk II
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
1
4
16-30
6
7
31-45
2
4
46-60
5
6
61-75
2
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Lommel United
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
4
16-30
7
7
31-45
8
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
10
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.42
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
124%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KRC Genk II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.74
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Lommel United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
154%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KRC Genk IILigaLommel United
Average goals per game 3.182.76 3.67
Both teams scored 71%53% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%51% 72%
Clean sheets 12%27% 28%
Goal before half-time 82%73% 89%
Goal after half-time 82%79% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lommel UnitedGoalRalf SeuntjensAssist: Sam de Grand
  2. Lommel UnitedGoalLucas schoofs
  3. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Myung-Jun KimOff: Jelle Driessen
  4. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Jason van DuivenOff: Mohamed Salah El Boukammiri
  5. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Nicolas RommensOff: Lautaro López
  6. Lommel UnitedSubstitutionOn: Zalán VancsaOff: Ralf Seuntjens
  7. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Jonathan CoenenOff: Michiel Cauwel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Lander BultynckMatches officiated: 13
3.31Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins23%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from KRC Genk II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Lommel United. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Lommel United
1 : 2
Jong KRC Genk

FAQ

What was the result of KRC Genk II vs Lommel United?

The First Division B match finished KRC Genk II 0:2 Lommel United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KRC Genk II vs Lommel United?

KRC Genk II score 1.24 goals per game on average and Lommel United 2.11. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 71% of KRC Genk II's matches and 67% of Lommel United's.

What form are KRC Genk II and Lommel United in?

Over the last 5 games KRC Genk II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lommel United 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KRC Genk II vs Lommel United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.