KRC Genk II vs RWDM: match statistics
RWDM demonstrates a clear advantage over KRC Genk II in key statistics. The hosts occupy 15th place in the table with a catastrophic home record – just 22% wins at home and a staggering 67% losses, conceding an average of 2.22 goals per match. RWDM, despite being in 11th position, shows better offensive efficiency (1.56 vs 1.33 goals per match) and a more solid defense in away matches (1.67 vs 2.22 goals conceded). A key factor is also the advantage in possession (52% vs 48%) and higher accuracy in shots on target (4.33 vs 3.78). The recent form of both teams is similar (0.8 points per match each), yet RWDM's statistical advantage in away matches combined with the hosts' defensive weakness argue for a win for the visitors. KRC Genk II's goal difference in home matches stands at -8, further confirming their issues.
KRC Genk II vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KRC Genk II played against RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on January 27, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
KRC Genk II has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. RWDM has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
KRC Genk II scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 2.05. RWDM scores 1.65 and allows 1.90. Games in this league average 2.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 68% of KRC Genk II's games and 60% of RWDM's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 65%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
RWDM has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.17 per game. KRC Genk II takes 10.5 shots per game, while RWDM takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
KRC Genk II leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.47 goals per game after halftime. RWDM leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.85 after halftime.
When the teams score
KRC Genk II's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For RWDM, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.78 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RWDM demonstrates a clear advantage over KRC Genk II in key statistics. The hosts occupy 15th place in the table with a catastrophic home record – just 22% wins at home and a staggering 67% losses, conceding an average of 2.22 goals per match. RWDM, despite being in 11th position, shows better offensive efficiency (1.56 vs 1.33 goals per match) and a more solid defense in away matches (1.67 vs 2.22 goals conceded). A key factor is also the advantage in possession (52% vs 48%) and higher accuracy in shots on target (4.33 vs 3.78). The recent form of both teams is similar (0.8 points per match each), yet RWDM's statistical advantage in away matches combined with the hosts' defensive weakness argue for a win for the visitors. KRC Genk II's goal difference in home matches stands at -8, further confirming their issues.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KRC Genk II | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 42% better for: goals scored per game.
1.16 goals / game - KRC Genk II · 1.65 goals / game - RWDM
RWDM is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.05 goals / game - KRC Genk II · 1.9 goals / game - RWDM
KRC Genk II scores in 68% of games (13 of 19 meczów), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 meczów).
RWDM scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KRC Genk II
Over / Under - RWDM
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / game - KRC Genk II · 1.45 pts / game - RWDM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KRC Genk II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KRC Genk II
RWDM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| KRC Genk II | Liga | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.21 | 2.78 | ▲ 3.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 52% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 26% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 79% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from KRC Genk II's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against RWDM. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KRC Genk II vs RWDM?
The First Division B match finished KRC Genk II 0:2 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KRC Genk II vs RWDM?
KRC Genk II score 1.16 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.65. The First Division B average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 68% of KRC Genk II's matches and 60% of RWDM's.
What form are KRC Genk II and RWDM in?
Over the last 5 games KRC Genk II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RWDM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KRC Genk II vs RWDM?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KRC Genk II vs RWDM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.