KRC Genk vs KAA Gent: match statistics
KRC Genk vs KAA Gent: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KRC Genk played against KAA Gent in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Luminus Arena. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
KRC Genk has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. KAA Gent has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
KRC Genk scores 2.40 goals per game and allows 1.60. KAA Gent scores 2.00 and allows 0.40. Games in this league average 3.10 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of KRC Genk's games and 40% of KAA Gent's. The Over 2.5 rates are 80% and 60%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KRC Genk has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.32 per game. KRC Genk takes 13.0 shots per game, while KAA Gent takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
KRC Genk leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. KAA Gent leads at halftime in 40% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
KRC Genk's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For KAA Gent, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Pro League games average 3.10 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KRC Genk have looked very strong at home: they have won both home games, averaging 3.5 goals per match and registering 7 shots on target from 17 attempts. The hosts are also creating significantly better chances, as reflected by an average xG of 2.02 compared with just 0.94 for Gent away from home. However, KAA Gent remain unbeaten this season with a record of 5 wins and are enjoying an excellent run of 4 wins and a draw in their last 5 matches, conceding just 3 goals during that period. The visitors are clinical, averaging 2.5 goals away from home and converting 29% of their shots, but their lower volume of attempts—8.5 per match—suggests that Genk may have the edge in chance creation. An open game is expected, with home advantage and superior chance quality likely to tip the balance narrowly in favor of the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal statistics point to a moderately stronger No Goal scenario for one of the teams: Genk’s BTTS rate is 33%, while Gent’s is 50%, against a league average of 42%. Genk keeps a clean sheet in 67% of matches, and Gent in 50%, while neither team has finished a match this season without scoring. The hosts allow opponents just 0.33 goals per match, which significantly limits Gent’s chances despite their average of 2.50 goals scored. Recent five-match form increases the BTTS risk, as Genk conceded 1.6 goals per match, but Gent conceded only 0.6 goals during this period, with an xG against of 1.06. Genk’s creative advantage, reflected in 1.58 xG and 5.67 shots on target per match compared with Gent’s 0.94 xG and 3.00 shots on target, favors a result with a home goal without requiring an away response—BTTS No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The projected total of 2.60 goals is driven by Genk’s superiority in chance creation: the hosts average 1.58 xG, while Gent allow 1.16 xG. Gent score as many as 2.50 goals per away match, but their average xG is only 0.94, and an exceptionally high 29% shot conversion rate suggests that this output could decline. In their last five matches, both teams have often played more openly, with Over 2.5 goals landing in 80% of Genk’s games and 60% of Gent’s, increasing the chances of at least two goals. At the same time, across the entire season so far, neither team has played a match with more than three goals, and both have recorded Under 3.5 goals in 100% of their matches. The Under 3.5 line therefore has the strongest support, combining highly consistent defensive performances with an expected total closer to 2–3 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Genk have the clearer chance-creation potential: their average xG stands at 1.58 compared with Gent’s 0.94, while the hosts average 14.33 shots and 5.67 shots on target per match, versus 8.5 and 3.0 for their opponents. In their last five matches, Genk averaged 1.4 goals before half-time, while Gent managed only 0.6, with the hosts particularly dangerous between the 31st and 45th minutes, scoring three goals during that period. A draw at the break remains a realistic possibility, as both teams recorded one in 60% of their last five matches, but Genk’s attacking advantage increases the likelihood of them taking the lead before half-time. After the break, Gent remain dangerous, averaging 1.2 goals across their last five appearances, but Genk have conceded just 0.33 goals per home match this season and kept a clean sheet in 67% of their fixtures. The most likely scenario is therefore a home win both at half-time and at full-time: 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KRC Genk | KAA Gent | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KAA Gent is 88% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - KRC Genk · 3 pts / game - KAA Gent
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KRC Genk is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
2.4 goals / game - KRC Genk · 2 goals / game - KAA Gent
KAA Gent is 300% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.6 goals / game - KRC Genk · 0.4 goals / game - KAA Gent
KRC Genk scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while KAA Gent keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).
KAA Gent scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while KRC Genk keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KRC Genk
Over / Under - KAA Gent
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KRC Genk - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KAA Gent - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KRC Genk
KAA Gent
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| KRC Genk | Liga | KAA Gent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 3.10 | ▼ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 43% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 80% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 30% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 84% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KRC Genk's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against KAA Gent. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KRC Genk vs KAA Gent?
The Pro League match finished KRC Genk 1:1 KAA Gent. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KRC Genk and KAA Gent?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KRC Genk won 1, KAA Gent won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KRC Genk vs KAA Gent?
KRC Genk score 2.40 goals per game on average and KAA Gent 2.00. The Pro League average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 60% of KRC Genk's matches and 40% of KAA Gent's.
What form are KRC Genk and KAA Gent in?
Over the last 5 games KRC Genk have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and KAA Gent 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KRC Genk vs KAA Gent?
The statistical background for KRC Genk vs KAA Gent — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


