Switzerland - Challenge LeagueStadion KleinfeldData current as of October 16, 2026

Kriens vs Wil: match statistics

Kriens crest
Kriens
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Wil crest
Wil

Kriens vs Wil: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Kriens played against Wil in Challenge League (Switzerland). The game was played on October 9, 2026. Venue: Stadion Kleinfeld. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Kriens has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Wil has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Kriens scores 1.78 goals per game and allows 1.22. Wil scores 1.67 and allows 2.33. Games in this league average 3.02 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of Kriens's games and 56% of Wil's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 67%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 60% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kriens has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.59 per game. Kriens takes 13.8 shots per game, while Wil takes 16.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Kriens leads at halftime in 56% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Wil leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Kriens's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Wil, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Challenge League games average 3.02 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 60% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kriens sit 4th and have won 3 of their 5 home matches, while ninth-placed Wil have managed just 1 win in 5 away games. The hosts average 1.8 goals scored and 1.0 conceded at home, whereas the visitors score 1.4 and concede as many as 3.0 goals per match on the road. Kriens’ superior finishing is reflected in their shot conversion rate of 14% compared with Wil’s 9%, although the teams’ expected goals figures are close: 1.63 for Kriens at home and 1.53 for Wil away. Over their last five matches, Kriens have scored 10 goals and conceded 6, while Wil have scored 9 and conceded 8, further pointing to a slightly better record for the hosts. Wil’s three draws in their last five matches call for caution, but their poor away defending and failure to keep a clean sheet support a Kriens win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario in which both teams score is supported by season-long BTTS rates of 50% for Kriens and 60% for Wil, with both teams recording 60% in their last 5 matches. Kriens average 2.0 goals at home, while Wil concede 3.0 away from home, making a goal for the hosts particularly likely. The visitors average 1.4 goals away and generate an xG of 1.53, while Kriens concede 1.5 goals per game at home. In their last 5 matches, the teams averaged 2.0 and 1.8 goals scored respectively, further supporting goals at both ends. The main risk is that Wil have failed to score in 40% of their away matches, so the case for BTTS - Yes is clear, but not overwhelming.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Kriens and Wil matches have gone over 1.5 goals in 100% of their previous meetings, making this the strongest signal for the market. Kriens average 2.0 goals scored, while Wil concede 3.0, giving the hosts a clear basis for scoring more than once. The visitors average 1.4 goals scored, with an xG of 1.53, so they could also get on the scoresheet. In their last five matches, both teams went over 2.5 goals in 60% of games, but the 3.40-goal forecast does not provide equally strong support for higher lines. Over 1.5 goals is the pick because it requires just two goals and is better supported by both teams’ results.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is Kriens leading at the break: the hosts did so in 3 of their last 5 matches, while Wil were trailing at half-time in 3 of 5. Kriens score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while Wil concede 3.0 on the road, which points to the hosts maintaining their advantage through to full-time. After the break, the hosts score an average of 1.5 goals and concede 0.5, while the visitors score 0.6 and concede 1.2. Confidence in the pick is tempered by the fact that Wil averaged 1.4 goals after half-time across their last 5 matches; however, their frequent first-half deficits and weaker away results make Kriens leading at the break and winning the most likely HT/FT scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
KriensWil
13Shots15
KriensWil
2Shots on target4
KriensWil
1.43xG1.75
KriensWil
5Corners7
KriensWil
65Dangerous attacks73
KriensWil
12Fouls17
KriensWil
3Cards5
KriensWil

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.78Goals scored / game1.67
KriensWil
1.22Goals allowed / game2.33
KriensWil
46%Average possession47%
KriensWil
5.67Shots on target / game4.44
KriensWil

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.78Shots per game16.33
KriensWil
5.67Shots on target4.44
KriensWil
12.9%Shot conversion10.2%
KriensWil
46%Possession47%
KriensWil
1.68xG for1.59
KriensWil
1.88xG against1.75
KriensWil

Shooting quality

Kriens: Counter-attackingWil: Attacking
KriensWil
Accuracy (shots on target)41%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kriens is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Kriens · 1.2 pts / game - Wil

Kriens
WDLDW
Season result split
44% W22% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-3
1.56 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 2.12BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Wil
DDDLW
Season result split
22% W33% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kriens is 7% better for: goals scored per game.

1.78 goals / game - Kriens · 1.67 goals / game - Wil

Kriens is 91% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.22 goals / game - Kriens · 2.33 goals / game - Wil

Kriens scoring profile: very strong

Kriens scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 games), while Wil keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 games).

Wil scoring profile: strong

Wil scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while Kriens keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 games).

16Goals scored (season)15
KriensWil
11Goals conceded (season)21
KriensWil
3Average goals per game4
KriensWil
10Goals scored (last 5)9
KriensWil
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
KriensWil

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal67%
KriensWil
67%2 goals33%
KriensWil
22%3 goals22%
KriensWil
11%4 goals22%
KriensWil

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal89%
KriensWil
44%2 goals67%
KriensWil
11%3 goals33%
KriensWil
0%4 goals33%
KriensWil

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
KriensWil
0%BTTS in both halves11%
KriensWil
56%Scored in both halves22%
KriensWil

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
KriensWil
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
KriensWil
60%BTTS - last 560%
KriensWil

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KriensWil
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
KriensWil
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
KriensWil

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
KriensWil
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
KriensWil
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
KriensWil

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kriens is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.78 pts / game - Kriens · 0.89 pts / game - Wil

Kriens - half-time state
56% leading11% draw33% trailing
Wil - half-time state
22% leading22% draw56% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.78Points per game (1st half)0.89
KriensWil
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.67
KriensWil
0.89Goals conceded (1st half)1.44
KriensWil
1.78Average goals (1st half)2.11
KriensWil
44%Clean sheet before half-time11%
KriensWil
33%No goal before half-time56%
KriensWil

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per game (2nd half)1.22
KriensWil
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)1
KriensWil
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
KriensWil
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.89
KriensWil
67%Clean sheet after half-time44%
KriensWil
33%No goal after half-time56%
KriensWil

Kriens - second-half results

56% W22% D22% L
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding79%

Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 44%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.6

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Wil - second-half results

33% W22% D44% L
8
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kriens - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.60
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Wil - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.00
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game1.20.4
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Kriens
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
0
46-60
4
3
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Wil
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
2
3
16-30
1
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Kriens

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Wil

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Challenge League).

Teams vs league

KriensLigaWil
Average goals per game• 3.003.02▲ 4.00
Both teams scored▼ 44%56%• 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 44%60%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▲ 33%24%▼ 11%
Goal before half-time▲ 89%82%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 89%87%▲ 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.02
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / game
1.20
Away goals / game
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WilYellow cardLoris Schreiber
  2. KriensYellow cardMauricio Willimann Rangel
  3. KriensYellow cardAlbin Krasniqi
  4. KriensYellow cardJulian Hermann
  5. KriensSubstitutionOn: Lukas RiedmannOff: Nico Siegrist
  6. WilYellow cardYannick Schmid
  7. WilYellow cardDjawal Kaiba
  8. KriensSubstitutionOn: Bleron MulliqiOff: Enea Heiniger
  9. WilSubstitutionOn: Orges Naser BunjakuOff: Noah Manuel Rupp
  10. WilYellow cardPatrick Sutter
  11. WilSubstitutionOn: Tarik SeferovicOff: Loris Schreiber
  12. WilYellow cardMahamadou Diarra

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Kriens's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Wil. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Kriens vs Wil?

The Challenge League match finished Kriens 1:1 Wil. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kriens vs Wil?

Kriens score 1.78 goals per game on average and Wil 1.67. The Challenge League average is 3.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Kriens's matches and 56% of Wil's.

What form are Kriens and Wil in?

Over the last 5 games Kriens have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Wil 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kriens vs Wil?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kriens vs Wil: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.