Krka vs Triglav: match statistics
Krka vs Triglav: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Krka played against Triglav in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on April 3, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Krka has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Triglav has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Krka scores 0.86 goals per game and allows 1.52. Triglav scores 2.67 and allows 1.05. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Krka's games and 43% of Triglav's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 62%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Triglav has the higher season xG average, 2.00 to 1.47 per game. Krka takes 10.9 shots per game, while Triglav takes 15.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Krka leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Triglav leads at halftime in 52% and scores 1.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
Krka's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (6 goals). For Triglav, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
2. SNL games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2): Triglav have scored 56 goals this season and average 2.3 goals per away match, while Krka have 18 goals and only 0.7 goals per home game. The difference in chance creation is clear — Triglav average 14.6 shots (5.4 on target) and 59% possession away, Krka 10 shots (3.3 on target) and 49% possession at home. The visitors are far more efficient: a conversion rate of 16% versus the hosts' 7% and higher xG (1.83 vs 1.33) indicate Triglav not only create more chances but finish them better. Looking at form, Triglav have 9 goals in the last 5 matches and average 2.2 points per game, whereas Krka have only 1 goal and 0.8 points with a recent record of 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss in five. Additionally, the goal differential advantage (+11 for Triglav away vs -10 for Krka at home) and a higher clean sheet percentage (50% vs 20%) suggest a decisive edge for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 45% for Krka and 40% for Triglav, both below the league average of 50%. In the last 5 matches Krka had only 20% BTTS and averaged 0.2 goals per match (1 goal total in L5), while Triglav in that period has 40% BTTS, scored 9 goals and concedes only 0.4 goals on average. Although Krka has a high season average goals scored 3.0 and xG 2.14 with 16.18 shots per match, in the last 5 matches its xG has fallen to 1.17 and finishing has clearly declined. Triglav shows better offensive and defensive form in L5 (xG 2.06, 9 goals scored, 0.4 conceded) and seasonally has 50% clean sheets versus Krka’s 36%, which increases the chance of a clean sheet for the away side. Considering Krka’s poor scoring form (0.2 in L5), Triglav’s stronger defense and BTTS below the league average, I forecast 30% for BTTS - Yes and 70% for BTTS - No (pick: no).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
To estimate expected goals I used xG: Krka has xG 2.14 per match, while Triglav concedes on average 1.41 xG per match, yielding an estimated 1.78 expected goals for the home side; similarly Triglav has xG 1.83 and Krka concedes 1.21, giving 1.52 for the away side, total 3.30 goals. With a combined expectation of 3.30, a Poisson distribution gives probability for Under 1.5 around 15.9% (Over 1.5 ≈84.1%), Under 2.5 ≈35.9% (Over 2.5 ≈64.1%) and Under 3.5 ≈57.9% (Over 3.5 ≈42.1%). Seasonal stats support this picture: Krka records over1.5 in 91% of matches, Triglav in 80%, and over2.5 occurs for them in 64% and 60% of games respectively. Recent form must be considered: in the last 5 matches Krka scored a total of 1 goal and has last 5 xG 1.17, while Triglav has 9 goals in the last 5 and xG 2.06, which increases variance and reduces confidence for very high lines (above 3.5). The strongest and most justified pick is Over 1.5 due to the combined xG 3.30 and seasonal 91%/80% for over1.5, therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Triglav appears to be the favorite to win after 90 minutes: they average 2.2 points per match versus Krka's 1.82 and have a season win rate of 70% versus the home side's 55%. In the last 5 matches Triglav have won 60% of games, while Krka have not won any (0%). Although over the season Krka score more goals (3.0 per match vs 2.3 for Triglav) and have higher xG (2.14 vs 1.83) and more shots (16.18 vs 14.6), recent form over the last 5 favors the visitors: Triglav average 1.8 goals in their last 5, Krka only 0.2. At Half-Time I expect a draw, since average goals by half are almost equal (1.27 for Krka vs 1.30 for Triglav) and the hosts recorded draws at the break in 60% of their last 5 matches. After the break I predict a Triglav advantage — the higher PPG (2.2 vs 1.82) and better form suggest the visitors will take the win, hence X/2 as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Krka | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.22 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Triglav is 175% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Krka · 2.2 pts / game - Triglav
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Triglav is 210% better for: goals scored per game.
0.86 goals / game - Krka · 2.67 goals / game - Triglav
Triglav is 45% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.52 goals / game - Krka · 1.05 goals / game - Triglav
Krka scores in 48% of games (10 of 21 meczów), while Triglav keeps a clean sheet in 43% (9 of 21 meczów).
Triglav scores in 81% of games (17 of 21 meczów), while Krka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Krka
Over / Under - Triglav
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Triglav is 46% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.24 pts / game - Krka · 1.81 pts / game - Triglav
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Krka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 19%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Triglav - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Krka
Triglav
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Krka | Liga | Triglav | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.38 | 2.83 | ▲ 3.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 50% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 54% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 29% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 79% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Krka's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Triglav. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Krka vs Triglav?
The 2. SNL match finished Krka 0:2 Triglav. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Krka vs Triglav?
Krka score 0.86 goals per game on average and Triglav 2.67. The 2. SNL average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Krka's matches and 43% of Triglav's.
What form are Krka and Triglav in?
Over the last 5 games Krka have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and Triglav 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Krka vs Triglav?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


