Slovenia - 2. SNLŠtadion Matije GubcaData current as of August 31, 2026

Krško vs Dekani: match statistics

Krško crest
Krško
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Dekani crest
Dekani

Krško vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Krško played against Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Štadion Matije Gubca. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Krško has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.33 points per game. Dekani has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Krško scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.67. Dekani scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 67% of Krško's games and 0% of Dekani's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 33%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Dekani has the higher season xG average, 1.22 to 1.16 per game. Krško takes 9.3 shots per game, while Dekani takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Krško leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Dekani leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Krško's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Dekani, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

2. SNL games average 2.88 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Krško come into the match after a run of 3 wins, a draw and a defeat in their last 5 games, scoring as many as 11 goals during that period, compared with Dekani’s 7. At home, the hosts create chances worth an average xG of 1.17 and register 4 shots on target per game, while Dekani have yet to score away from home, have not recorded a shot on target and have failed to score in 100% of such matches. The visitors control possession better on the road, averaging 60% compared with Krško’s 45%, but this translates into only 0.80 xG. Krško’s defense is a clear risk, as they concede an average of 3.5 goals at home despite an xG against of 1.88, but Dekani have limited attacking potential. Home advantage and significantly better current scoring form support a home win, although their defensive issues increase the likelihood of a closely contested match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as Dekani’s seasonal data shows an average of no goals scored, no shots on target, and no big chances converted so far. The visitors have failed to score in 100% of their matches to date, while both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 0%, compared with the league average of just 35%. Krško keep a clean sheet in 50% of matches and concede an average of 1.0 goal, while Dekani’s attacking potential according to xG is only 0.80. The last five matches offer a slightly greater chance of goals, with Dekani averaging 1.4 goals scored and Krško conceding 1.6, but the visitors’ BTTS rate during this period was only 20%. Krško should create more danger, recording 1.44 xG and 3.0 shots on target per match compared with Dekani’s 0.80 xG and 0.0 shots on target. However, the most likely outcome remains one in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Krško have averaged 2.2 goals over their last five matches, but their average xG was only 1.13, suggesting partially above-average finishing efficiency. Dekani scored 1.4 goals per game during this period with an xG of 1.36; however, they have yet to score in their away fixtures in the season data and average only 6.0 shots. The hosts have recently allowed 1.79 xG, making a goal for the visitors a realistic possibility, but the profile of both teams does not point to regular four-goal games. All previous meetings between the two sides finished below 3.5 goals, while the projected total of 2.35 goals provides a clear edge for Under 3.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Krško have the clear attacking edge: they average 1.5 goals at home, with an xG of 1.44, while Dekani generate just 0.80 xG away from home. The hosts have led at the break in 50% of their home matches so far, whereas Dekani have been behind at half-time in 100% of their away fixtures. Their last-five-match form also favors Krško, who have won 60% of those games and scored an average of 2.2 goals, compared with Dekani’s 40% win rate and 1.4 goals scored per match. After the break, Krško have averaged 1.4 goals across their last five appearances while conceding just 0.4, increasing the likelihood of them maintaining or extending their lead. The most likely outcome is therefore an HT/FT 1/1, with the hosts leading at half-time and securing the win at the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

52Possession (%)48
KrškoDekani
8Shots10
KrškoDekani
4Shots on target4
KrškoDekani
1.12xG1.46
KrškoDekani
5Corners6
KrškoDekani
44Dangerous attacks74
KrškoDekani
13Fouls15
KrškoDekani
0Cards0
KrškoDekani

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game1
KrškoDekani
2.67Goals allowed / game1
KrškoDekani
45%Average possession58%
KrškoDekani
3.33Shots on target / game2
KrškoDekani

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.33Shots per game9.67
KrškoDekani
3.33Shots on target2
KrškoDekani
10.7%Shot conversion10.3%
KrškoDekani
45%Possession58%
KrškoDekani
1.16xG for1.22
KrškoDekani
1.7xG against1.06
KrškoDekani

Shooting quality

Krško: BalancedDekani: Balanced
KrškoDekani
Accuracy (shots on target)36%21%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Krško is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.33 pts / game - Krško · 1 pts / game - Dekani

Krško
WDL
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.7xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%
Dekani
WLL
Season result split
33% W0% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dekani is 167% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.67 goals / game - Krško · 1 goals / game - Dekani

Krško scoring profile: strong

Krško scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).

Dekani scoring profile: strong

Dekani scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 meczów), while Krško keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).

3Goals scored (season)3
KrškoDekani
8Goals conceded (season)3
KrškoDekani
3.67Average goals per game2
KrškoDekani
3Goals scored (last 5)3
KrškoDekani
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
KrškoDekani

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal33%
KrškoDekani
33%2 goals33%
KrškoDekani
0%3 goals33%
KrškoDekani
0%4 goals0%
KrškoDekani

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal67%
KrškoDekani
33%2 goals33%
KrškoDekani
33%3 goals0%
KrškoDekani
33%4 goals0%
KrškoDekani

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
KrškoDekani
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KrškoDekani
0%Scored in both halves33%
KrškoDekani

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
KrškoDekani
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS33%
KrškoDekani
67%BTTS - last 50%
KrškoDekani

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KrškoDekani
67%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
KrškoDekani
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KrškoDekani

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
KrškoDekani
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
KrškoDekani
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KrškoDekani

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Krško - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing
Dekani - half-time state
33% leading0% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1
KrškoDekani
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.67
KrškoDekani
2Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
KrškoDekani
2.67Average goals (1st half)1.33
KrškoDekani
33%Clean sheet before half-time33%
KrškoDekani
67%No goal before half-time67%
KrškoDekani

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.33
KrškoDekani
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
KrškoDekani
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
KrškoDekani
1Average goals (2nd half)0.67
KrškoDekani
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KrškoDekani
67%No goal after half-time67%
KrškoDekani

Krško - second-half results

33% W0% R67% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-1.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Dekani - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Krško - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.70.3
Goals allowed / game2.00.7
Average goals per game2.71.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals67%0%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 0% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Dekani - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.33
Goals scored / game0.70.3
Goals allowed / game0.70.3
Average goals per game1.30.7
1 goal100%67%
2 goals33%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%67%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 33% leading - 0% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Krško
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
3
16-30
1
2
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Krško

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.97
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
188%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

KrškoLigaDekani
Average goals per game 3.672.88 2.00
Both teams scored 67%38% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%58% 33%
Clean sheets 0%33% 33%
Goal before half-time 100%77% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%85% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.88
Average goals per game
38%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / game
1.42
Away goals / game
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Krško's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Dekani. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

NK Krško
1 : 1
NK Jadran Dekani
NK Jadran Dekani
1 : 2
NK Krško

FAQ

What was the result of Krško vs Dekani?

The 2. SNL match finished Krško 0:0 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Krško and Dekani?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Krško won 1, Dekani won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Krško vs Dekani?

Krško score 1.00 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.00. The 2. SNL average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Krško's matches and 0% of Dekani's.

What form are Krško and Dekani in?

Over the last 5 games Krško have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and Dekani 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Krško vs Dekani?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.