Poland - 3 Liga Group 4Data current as of October 17, 2026

KS Hetman Zamosc vs Chełmianka Chełm: match statistics

KS Hetman Zamosc vs Chełmianka Chełm: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KS Hetman Zamosc played against Chełmianka Chełm in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The game was played on October 4, 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Recent form

KS Hetman Zamosc has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Chełmianka Chełm has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

KS Hetman Zamosc scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.80. Chełmianka Chełm scores 1.60 and allows 0.30. Games in this league average 2.95 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 80% of KS Hetman Zamosc's games and 30% of Chełmianka Chełm's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 30%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KS Hetman Zamosc has the higher season xG average, 1.98 to 1.70 per game. KS Hetman Zamosc takes 4.1 shots per game, while Chełmianka Chełm takes 2.2.

First-half and second-half trends

KS Hetman Zamosc leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Chełmianka Chełm leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

KS Hetman Zamosc's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Chełmianka Chełm, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3 Liga Group 4 games average 2.95 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chełmianka Chełm remain unbeaten after 10 matches this season, with a record of 8 wins and 2 draws, while KS Hetman Zamość have won 3 of their 10 matches. The visitors have recorded 4 wins and a draw in their last 5 away games, while the hosts have won twice, drawn twice and lost once at home over the same period. The biggest difference lies in defense: Chełmianka have conceded just 3 goals all season and none away from home, whereas Hetman have conceded 13 goals in their last 5 matches. The hosts can still pose a threat, averaging 1.8 goals at home compared with the visitors’ 1.6 away. With both teams posting a similar shot conversion rate of 17%, Chełmianka’s advantage in shots on target away from home — 6 per match compared with Hetman’s 3 at home — points to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Chełmianka’s defensive record: they have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their away matches and conceded an average of just 0.4 goals across their last 5 games. Hetman have scored in every home match and averaged 2.2 goals over their last 5 outings, so breaking down the visitors’ defense is possible. However, their own defense looks less convincing: they conceded an average of 2.6 goals over the same period, while Chełmianka scored 1.2. Although both teams scored in 100% and 40% of the teams’ respective last 5 matches, Chełmianka’s run of away clean sheets points to a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: none of Hetman’s home matches or Chełmianka’s away matches to date have produced 4 or more goals. The visitors concede an average of 0.0 goals away from home and have kept a clean sheet in 100% of those matches, limiting the hosts’ scoring potential. On the other hand, Hetman have averaged 2.2 goals scored and 2.6 conceded over their last 5 matches, so their recent form calls for caution. However, Chełmianka have conceded just 0.4 goals per match over the same period, and only 20% of their matches have gone over the 2.5-goal line. An estimated total of 2.5 goals therefore gives Under 3.5 goals a clearer edge than the lower lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Chełmianka leading at the break and going on to win: they led at half-time in 3 of 4 away matches, scoring an average of 1.5 goals before the break. Hetman were level at half-time in both recorded home matches and failed to score in either first half, strengthening the visitors’ advantage at this stage. Chełmianka’s ability to maintain their lead is supported by the fact that they won 80% of their away matches without conceding, although Hetman won just as often at home. Across their last five matches overall, the visitors collected 11 points compared with 7 for the hosts, while Hetman conceded an average of 2.6 goals, against 0.4 for Chełmianka. A draw at half-time followed by an away win remains an alternative, as Chełmianka were level at the break in 3 of their last 4 matches; therefore, the case for 2/2 is not particularly strong.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
-1Shots-1
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
-1Shots on target-1
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
0xG0
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
-1Corners-1
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
0Dangerous attacks0
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
-1Fouls-1
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
-1Cards-1
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
1.8Goals scored / game1.6
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
1.8Goals allowed / game0.3
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
14%Average possession10%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
1.2Shots on target / game0.4
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

4.1Shots per game2.2
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
1.2Shots on target0.4
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
43.9%Shot conversion72.7%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
14%Possession10%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
1.98xG for1.7
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
1.62xG against1.52
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

Shooting quality

KS Hetman Zamosc: Counter-attackingChełmianka Chełm: Counter-attacking
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
Accuracy (shots on target)29%18%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.480.77
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.504.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chełmianka Chełm is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - KS Hetman Zamosc · 2.2 pts / game - Chełmianka Chełm

KS Hetman Zamosc
LWLDW
Season result split
30% W40% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-3
1.30 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.98Opponent xG: 2.43BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Chełmianka Chełm
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
80% W20% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-2-0
2.60 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KS Hetman Zamosc is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.8 goals / game - KS Hetman Zamosc · 1.6 goals / game - Chełmianka Chełm

Chełmianka Chełm is 500% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.8 goals / game - KS Hetman Zamosc · 0.3 goals / game - Chełmianka Chełm

KS Hetman Zamosc scoring profile: mixed

KS Hetman Zamosc scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 games), while Chełmianka Chełm keeps a clean sheet in 70% (7 of 10 games).

Chełmianka Chełm scoring profile: very strong

Chełmianka Chełm scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 games), while KS Hetman Zamosc keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 games).

18Goals scored (season)16
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
18Goals conceded (season)3
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
3.6Average goals per game1.9
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
11Goals scored (last 5)6
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
13Goals conceded (last 5)2
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal90%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
70%2 goals60%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
20%3 goals10%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
0%4 goals0%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal30%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
40%2 goals0%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
30%3 goals0%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
20%4 goals0%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time0%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
10%BTTS in both halves0%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
20%Scored in both halves10%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
100%BTTS - last 540%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time30%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time30%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
30%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chełmianka Chełm is 78% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / game - KS Hetman Zamosc · 1.6 pts / game - Chełmianka Chełm

KS Hetman Zamosc - half-time state
10% leading60% draw30% trailing
Chełmianka Chełm - half-time state
30% leading70% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per game (1st half)1.6
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.6
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
0.7Average goals (1st half)0.6
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
70%Clean sheet before half-time100%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
80%No goal before half-time70%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)1.4
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.2
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
1.7Average goals (2nd half)0.6
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
50%Clean sheet after half-time80%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm
40%No goal after half-time70%
KS Hetman ZamoscChełmianka Chełm

KS Hetman Zamosc - second-half results

30% W60% D10% L
9
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chełmianka Chełm - second-half results

20% W80% D0% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding267%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KS Hetman Zamosc - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.60
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.02.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Chełmianka Chełm - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.00.4
Average goals per game0.21.2
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KS Hetman Zamosc
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
1
3
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
5
1
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Chełmianka Chełm
ScoredConceded
7
1
0-15
3
0
16-30
2
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
81%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KS Hetman Zamosc

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 39% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Chełmianka Chełm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
19%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 44% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).

Teams vs league

KS Hetman ZamoscLigaChełmianka Chełm
Average goals per game▲ 3.602.95▼ 1.90
Both teams scored▲ 80%60%▼ 30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 70%56%▼ 30%
Clean sheets▼ 10%23%▲ 70%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%59%▼ 30%
Goal after half-time▼ 60%66%▼ 30%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / game
1.36
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of KS Hetman Zamosc vs Chełmianka Chełm?

The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished KS Hetman Zamosc 2:2 Chełmianka Chełm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KS Hetman Zamosc vs Chełmianka Chełm?

KS Hetman Zamosc score 1.80 goals per game on average and Chełmianka Chełm 1.60. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 80% of KS Hetman Zamosc's matches and 30% of Chełmianka Chełm's.

What form are KS Hetman Zamosc and Chełmianka Chełm in?

Over the last 5 games KS Hetman Zamosc have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chełmianka Chełm 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KS Hetman Zamosc vs Chełmianka Chełm?

The statistical background for KS Hetman Zamosc vs Chełmianka Chełm — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.