KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc: match statistics
KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KSZO played against KS Hetman Zamosc in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The game was played on September 27, 2026. Venue: Miejski Stadion Sportowy. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
KSZO has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. KS Hetman Zamosc has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
KSZO scores 1.56 goals per game and allows 0.67. KS Hetman Zamosc scores 1.78 and allows 1.89. Games in this league average 2.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of KSZO's games and 78% of KS Hetman Zamosc's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 67%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KS Hetman Zamosc has the higher season xG average, 2.97 to 1.73 per game. KSZO takes 10.3 shots per game, while KS Hetman Zamosc takes 3.6.
First-half and second-half trends
KSZO leads at halftime in 56% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. KS Hetman Zamosc leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.89 after halftime.
When the teams score
KSZO's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For KS Hetman Zamosc, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3 Liga Group 4 games average 2.94 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KSZO remain unbeaten this season, with a record of 5 wins and 4 draws, and have collected 11 points from their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws. The hosts are particularly solid defensively: at home, they concede just 0.8 goals per game on average and keep a clean sheet in 60% of their matches, while Hetman concede as many as 2.75 goals per away game and have failed to keep a clean sheet. The visitors’ recent form clearly weakens their prospects, having lost 3 of their previous 5 matches and conceded 13 goals in the process, while averaging just 0.8 points per game. Hetman do create plenty of chances, posting an average away xG of 2.97 and 13 shots on target, but their conversion rate is only 7%. Therefore, KSZO are more likely to capitalize on home advantage and their opponents’ defensive weaknesses.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
KSZO’s season-long BTTS rate stands at 60%, while Hetman Zamość’s is as high as 100%, both clearly above the league average of 56%. Hetman have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 2.75 goals per match, strongly supporting the prospect of the home side scoring, especially as KSZO average 1.80 goals per game. The visitors are also dangerous in attack, scoring an average of 1.75 goals, while KSZO, despite their strong defensive form in their last five matches, still have only a 20% clean-sheet rate for the season. The main argument against the BTTS signal is KSZO’s significant defensive improvement: they have conceded just 0.4 goals per match across their last five fixtures, meaning the BTTS scenario does not have a substantial edge. Nevertheless, Hetman’s weak defense and their record of 100% of matches featuring goals for both teams make BTTS - Yes the most likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
KSZO score an average of 1.80 goals per match, while Hetman Zamość concede as many as 2.75, clearly increasing the hosts’ scoring potential. The visitors average 1.75 goals and register as many as 13 shots on target per game, whereas KSZO keep a clean sheet in only 20% of matches. At least 2 goals were scored in 80% of KSZO’s games and in all of Hetman’s matches, while both teams went over the 2.5-goal line in 60% and 75% of cases, respectively. The last five games further highlight the visitors’ defensive weaknesses: Hetman conceded 13 goals, averaging 2.60 per match, while scoring 9. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as the profile of both teams points to a high probability of at least two goals, even in a more cautious match scenario.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KSZO have been clearly more stable over their last five matches: they have won 60% of their games, remain unbeaten, and conceded just 0.4 goals per match on average, while Hetman lost 60% of their outings and allowed opponents to score 2.6 goals per game. The hosts led at the break in 60% of their recent matches, whereas Hetman went into half-time trailing in as many as 67%; additionally, KSZO conceded just 0.2 goals per match before the interval, compared with 1.0 for the visitors. This advantage should persist after the restart, as KSZO conceded only 0.2 goals on average in the second half of their recent matches, while Hetman conceded 1.67. Although the visitors generate a high 2.97 xG and average 13 shots on target, this has not translated into results: they have a 0% win rate and average just 0.5 points per match. Therefore, the most likely scenario is KSZO leading at half-time and securing the victory at full-time: 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KSZO | KS Hetman Zamosc | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.83 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 1.78 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KSZO is 175% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - KSZO · 0.8 pts / game - KS Hetman Zamosc
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KS Hetman Zamosc is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1.56 goals / game - KSZO · 1.78 goals / game - KS Hetman Zamosc
KSZO is 182% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.67 goals / game - KSZO · 1.89 goals / game - KS Hetman Zamosc
KSZO scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 games), while KS Hetman Zamosc keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 games).
KS Hetman Zamosc scores in 89% of games (8 of 9 games), while KSZO keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KSZO
Over / Under - KS Hetman Zamosc
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KSZO is 137% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.11 pts / game - KSZO · 0.89 pts / game - KS Hetman Zamosc
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KSZO - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KS Hetman Zamosc - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KSZO
KS Hetman Zamosc
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).
Teams vs league
| KSZO | Liga | KS Hetman Zamosc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.22 | 2.94 | ▲ 3.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 57% | ▲ 78% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 54% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 25% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▼ 44% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 65% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KSZOGoalMaciej Gorski
FAQ
What was the result of KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc?
The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished KSZO 1:2 KS Hetman Zamosc. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc?
KSZO score 1.56 goals per game on average and KS Hetman Zamosc 1.78. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KSZO's matches and 78% of KS Hetman Zamosc's.
What form are KSZO and KS Hetman Zamosc in?
Over the last 5 games KSZO have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and KS Hetman Zamosc 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


