KTP vs Haka: match statistics
KTP vs Haka: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KTP played against Haka in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on June 8, 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
KTP has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Haka has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
KTP scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 0.78. Haka scores 1.78 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of KTP's games and 56% of Haka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 56%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.85 to 1.56 per game. KTP takes 16.7 shots per game, while Haka takes 12.0.
First-half and second-half trends
KTP leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. Haka leads at halftime in 22% and scores 1.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
KTP's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Haka, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KTP is the clear favorite: the hosts have won 5 of their last 5 matches and boast a 100% home win rate, scoring an average of 1.33 goals per home match with an average xG of 2.01. Haka have significant issues scoring away — the visitors average only 0.33 goals per away match, failed to score in 67% of away games and generate just 1.29 xG. Chance quality favors KTP: the hosts average 16.67 shots and 6 on target at home versus Haka’s 9 shots and 3.33 on target away, confirming superiority in chance creation. Defensively both teams show similar conceded-goal averages (0.33 conceded at home for KTP and 0.33 conceded away for Haka), but Haka have shipped 8 goals in their last 5 matches while KTP have conceded only 2, which further supports the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal against BTTS is the high clean sheet rate of Haka and the league as a whole: Haka have a seasonal 67% clean sheets rate, while the league average is 69%, indicating frequent shutouts. Additionally Haka score only 0.33 goals per away match on the season, and KTP have conceded an average of 0.4 goals in their last 5 matches (2 conceded in 5), so the visitors face difficulty scoring. It is true that KTP have a seasonal goals average of 2.5 and a seasonal BTTS rate of 83%, but KTP’s BTTS share in the last 5 matches dropped to 40% (2 of 5), suggesting more wins with a clean sheet. xG metrics give mixed signals: KTP xG is 1.67 versus Haka 1.29, and Haka in the last 5 matches have xG_for 1.39 and have conceded 8 goals (1.6 per game); however, considering the seasonal 0.33 away goals and the guests’ 67% clean sheets, the 'No Goal' scenario looks more likely. I estimate BTTS chances at 35% for 'BTTS - Yes' and 65% for 'No', therefore I recommend taking 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of approximately 2.55 goals: home ~1.65, away ~0.90. As a starting point I used xG and form — KTP xG 1.67 vs Haka average xG conceded 0.93 yields a baseline ~1.30 for the home side, and Haka xG 1.29 vs KTP xG conceded 1.20 yields ~1.25 for the away side; I adjusted these values accounting for KTP’s 13 average shots and 19% conversion and Haka’s 9 shots with only 4% conversion, as well as recent form over the last 5 matches (KTP 7 scored/2 conceded, Haka 5/8). Seasonal stats support KTP’s offensive edge at home: seasonOver15Percentage_home 100% and seasonOver25Percentage_home 83%, while Haka away has 0% in these categories. From a Poisson model with a mean of 2.55 the probabilities are: Over 1.5 ≈72%, Over 2.5 ≈47% and Over 3.5 ≈25%, therefore the strongest signal is over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KTP is the clear favorite for the final result: they average 2.5 goals at home versus Haka’s 0.33 away, have higher xG (1.67 vs 1.29), average 13 shots with 5.67 on target compared to the opponent’s 9 and 3.33, and a higher conversion rate of 19% vs 4%. However, the imbalance between goals before and after the break favors scoring in the second half — the hosts average 2.5 second-half goals versus 0.33 for the visitors and have scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90, indicating late deciders. At Half-Time a draw is more likely: KTP average 0.67 goals by the break, Haka 0.0, and Haka keep a clean sheet in 67% of away matches this season, so the probability of a goalless or level HT is elevated. Given the hosts’ stronger finish, I assign the largest share to the scenario draw at the break and KTP turnaround to win the match (X/1) — 36%. Overall I give KTP a 65% chance to win (1/1 22% + X/1 36% + 2/1 7%), 20% for a full-time draw and 15% for a Haka win, reflecting KTP’s form (5 wins in their last 5 matches) and Haka’s poor away goal average of 0.33.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | Haka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KTP is 50% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - KTP · 2 pts / game - Haka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haka is 46% better for: goals scored per game.
1.22 goals / game - KTP · 1.78 goals / game - Haka
KTP is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.78 goals / game - KTP · 1.11 goals / game - Haka
KTP scores in 89% of games (8 of 9 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 meczów).
Haka scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KTP
Over / Under - Haka
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - KTP · 1 pts / game - Haka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 78%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Haka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KTP
Haka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | Haka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 40% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 34% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KTP's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Haka. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs Haka?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 0:2 Haka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KTP and Haka?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KTP won 2, Haka won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs Haka?
KTP score 1.22 goals per game on average and Haka 1.78. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KTP's matches and 56% of Haka's.
What form are KTP and Haka in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Haka 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs Haka?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


