KTP vs JäPS: match statistics
KTP vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KTP play JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 10 July 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. JäPS: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
KTP scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. JäPS scores 0.93 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KTP 40%, JäPS 27%. Over 2.5: KTP 40%, JäPS 47%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.21. KTP: 15.3 shots per match, JäPS: 9.5.
Match halves
KTP: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07. JäPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). JäPS: 61-75 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
KTP holds a clear advantage across the available data — at home they win 67% of matches, score on average 2.00 goals per game and record average xG of 1.96, while JäPS win only 33% of away fixtures, average 1.00 goal and have xG 1.21. The home side averages 16 shots per match with 6.33 on target and maintains 51% possession, whereas the visitors average 10.5 shots with 3.5 on target and 42% possession, indicating greater control and more high-quality chances for KTP. Over the last 5 matches KTP have scored 12 goals and average 2.0 points per game, while JäPS have 5 goals and 1.2 points per game; additionally the visitors conceded 11 goals in those five fixtures. Defensively JäPS perform worse — they concede 1.83 goals on average away with xG against 1.98, versus KTP conceding 1.17 at home and home xG against of 1.10, which increases the likelihood that the hosts will create decisive scenarios. Considering higher efficiency (no-score rate 17% vs 33%), better chance quality (xG 1.96 vs 1.21) and form (12 goals vs 5 in the last 5), I tip the hosts to win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - KTP · 1.2 pts / match - JäPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 80% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - KTP · 0.93 goals / match - JäPS
KTP is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - KTP · 1.53 goals / match - JäPS
KTP scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
JäPS scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — KTP
Over / Under — JäPS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JäPS is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - KTP · 1.47 pts / match - JäPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -8 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KTP
JäPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.67 | 2.47 | • 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 31% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | • 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 73% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: KTP 1 - 0 - 0 JäPS. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs JäPS?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 4:1 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs JäPS?
KTP score 1.67 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.93. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 40% of KTP's matches and 27% of JäPS's.
What form are KTP and JäPS in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and JäPS 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs JäPS?
The statistical background for KTP vs JäPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.