KTP vs KäPa: match statistics
KTP vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KTP played against KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
KTP has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. KäPa has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
KTP scores 1.72 goals per game and allows 1.06. KäPa scores 1.06 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of KTP's games and 61% of KäPa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 67%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.78 to 1.36 per game. KTP takes 15.2 shots per game, while KäPa takes 11.1.
First-half and second-half trends
KTP leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 1.06 goals per game after halftime. KäPa leads at halftime in 28% and scores 0.44 after halftime.
When the teams score
KTP's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For KäPa, it is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KTP are top of the table and have won 12 of their 18 matches this season, while KäPa have recorded just 4 victories and suffered 10 defeats. At home, the hosts win 67% of their matches, score an average of 2.00 goals and create chances worth 1.87 xG, whereas KäPa score only 1.00 goal away from home with 1.25 xG. The difference is also evident defensively: KTP concede 1.11 goals per home match, compared with as many as 1.89 for the visitors, who keep a clean sheet in only 11% of their away games. Current form further favors the hosts, who have scored 10 goals and recorded 3 wins in their last five matches, while KäPa have managed 4 goals and lost 4 of their 5 games during the same period. KTP also register significantly more shots on target at home, averaging 5.89 compared with KäPa’s 2.89 away from home, which should translate into a clear advantage for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is supported by the fact that both teams scored in 56% of KTP’s matches this season and in as many as 67% of KäPa’s, clearly above the league average of 43%. Both sides keep a clean sheet in only 11% of their matches, while KäPa concede an average of 1.89 goals per game, significantly increasing KTP’s chances of scoring. The hosts are in better offensive form, averaging 2.0 goals over their last five matches with an xG of 1.71, while KTP’s defense allows opponents an xG of 1.51. KäPa have scored only 0.8 goals per game during this period, but their xG stands at 1.47, so the potential for a single goal remains greater than their results alone suggest. The teams’ recent run has produced BTTS in 60% of matches, making a scenario in which both sides score moderately the most likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams surpassed the 1.5-goal mark in 78% of their matches this season, providing a highly consistent and strong signal for the Over. KTP averaged 2.0 goals scored across their last five matches, while KäPa conceded as many as 2.0 goals per game over the same period. The hosts create an average of 1.48 xG, while the visitors allow opponents 1.60 xG, giving KTP clear grounds to score at least one or two goals. KäPa also have the potential to respond, as KTP concede an average of 1.44 goals, while both teams kept a clean sheet in only 11% of matches. The projected total of 2.80 goals primarily supports Over 1.5, which is a safer option than the more volatile 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a KTP win, as the hosts were level at the break in 5 of their 9 matches, while KäPa were trailing at half-time in 4 of 9. KTP are clearly in better form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 2.0 goals, won three times and collected 2.0 points per game, whereas KäPa have scored 0.8 goals, failed to win any match and lost 4 of 5. The hosts’ advantage should grow after the break, as KTP have averaged 1.4 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded in the second half of their last five appearances, while the visitors have scored just 0.4. KTP also create more chances over the course of the season, recording an xG of 1.48 compared with 1.25 and averaging 3.89 shots on target against KäPa’s 2.89, while the visitors’ defense concedes an average of 1.89 goals per match. Therefore, the recommended HT/FT pick is X/1: a draw at half-time and a KTP win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | KäPa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KTP is 900% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - KTP · 0.2 pts / game - KäPa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 62% better for: goals scored per game.
1.72 goals / game - KTP · 1.06 goals / game - KäPa
KTP is 58% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.06 goals / game - KTP · 1.67 goals / game - KäPa
KTP scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 games), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 games).
KäPa scores in 67% of games (12 of 18 games), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KTP
Over / Under - KäPa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - KTP · 1.22 pts / game - KäPa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
KäPa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 22%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KTP
KäPa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | KäPa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.78 | 2.45 | ▲ 2.72 |
| Both teams scored | • 44% | 44% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 44% | 44% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 31% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 62% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 72% | • 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KTP's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against KäPa. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs KäPa?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 2:1 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KTP and KäPa?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches KTP won 2, KäPa won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs KäPa?
KTP score 1.72 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.06. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of KTP's matches and 61% of KäPa's.
What form are KTP and KäPa in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and KäPa 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs KäPa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KTP vs KäPa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.