KTP vs PK-35: match statistics
KTP vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KTP played against PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 18, 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
KTP has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. PK-35 has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
KTP scores 1.79 goals per game and allows 1.00. PK-35 scores 1.71 and allows 0.57. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of KTP's games and 36% of PK-35's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 43%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.79 to 1.47 per game. KTP takes 15.5 shots per game, while PK-35 takes 11.7.
First-half and second-half trends
KTP leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 1.14 goals per game after halftime. PK-35 leads at halftime in 36% and scores 1.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
KTP's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For PK-35, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KTP has the home-field advantage: on average 2.29 goals scored and xG 1.91 per home match, while PK-35 averages 1.57 goals away with xG 1.40 — this gives the hosts an edge in chance creation. The hosts register significantly more shots (avg. 15.43) and more shots on target (6.29) than the visitors (11.29 shots and 3.86 on target), with similar conversion rates 15% versus 14%, which supports KTP in maintaining offensive dominance. However, PK-35’s away defense is exceptionally strong: only 0.14 goals conceded per match and 86% of away matches with a clean sheet, and in the last 5 matches the visitors conceded just 3 goals versus 7 conceded by KTP, which substantially limits the hosts’ attacking efficiency. Additionally, PK-35 have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.6 points per game, while KTP have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2.0 points per game, giving the visitors a slight form advantage. Considering KTP’s higher xG and number of shots on target (1.91 xG and 6.29 SoT at home) versus PK-35’s extraordinarily low goals conceded (0.14 per match), I forecast a narrow home victory; pick 1, with probabilities 45% home, 30% draw and 25% away.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
PK-35 has a seasonal goals conceded average of just 0.14 and keeps a clean sheet in 86% of matches, with a seasonal BTTS for PK-35 at 0% — the strongest signal against BTTS - Yes. KTP has a seasonal BTTS of 71%, scores 1.86 goals per game and has xG 1.54, with season goals 25 vs 24 for PK-35, so the home side consistently creates offense. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of cases and each team scored 14 goals in that period; however PK-35 concedes only 0.6 goals on average across those five games. Comparison of shot counts and xG (12.14 and xG 1.54 for KTP vs 11.29 and xG 1.4 for PK-35) shows balanced attacking output, but PK-35’s dominant defensive resilience (86% clean sheets, 0.14 goals conceded) prevails, therefore I tip No Goal / against BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.43 expected goals for KTP (xG attack 1.54 vs xG conceded to PK-35 1.32) and 1.34 for PK-35 (xG attack 1.40 vs xG conceded to KTP 1.28), totaling 2.77. With this mean, a Poisson distribution estimates ~76% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~52% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~30% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). KTP averages 12.14 shots and 4.29 on target, PK-35 11.29 and 3.86, with conversion rates of 15% and 14% — supporting chance conversion; in the last 5 matches both teams averaged 2.8 goals each. PK-35 concedes only 0.14 goals away on the season, but their xG against of 1.32 indicates some degree of luck in results, increasing the risk they concede. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (76%), therefore I recommend backing the Over side at the 1.5 line as the best bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PK-35 has an exceptionally strong defense: on average 0.14 goals conceded per match and 86% clean sheets, with a 71% away win rate (seasonConcededAVG_away = 0.14; seasonCSPercentage_away = 86%; winPercentage_away = 71%). KTP at home creates more chances and scores on average 1.86 goals per match and 0.71 goals by half-time (seasonScoredAVG_home = 1.86; scoredAVGHT_home = 0.71), but 71% of their home matches are level at the break (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 71%). xG indicates similar attacking potential (xG for KTP 1.54 vs xG for PK-35 1.40), so defense is decisive — PK-35 practically do not concede (seasonBTTSPercentage_away = 0.0; conceded_2hg_avg_away = 0.0). Second-half data show goals frequently occur after the interval (last5_over05_2hg_percentage_overall_home = 100% and last5_over05_2hg_percentage_overall_away = 100%), therefore a half-time draw and an away-side turnaround by full-time (X/2) appears most likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PK-35 is 30% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - KTP · 2.6 pts / game - PK-35
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 5% better for: goals scored per game.
1.79 goals / game - KTP · 1.71 goals / game - PK-35
PK-35 is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - KTP · 0.57 goals / game - PK-35
KTP scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 meczów).
PK-35 scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KTP
Over / Under - PK-35
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PK-35 is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / game - KTP · 1.64 pts / game - PK-35
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 64%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KTP
PK-35
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.79 | 2.49 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 45% | ▼ 36% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 45% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KTP's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against PK-35. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs PK-35?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 0:1 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs PK-35?
KTP score 1.79 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.71. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of KTP's matches and 36% of PK-35's.
What form are KTP and PK-35 in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and PK-35 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs PK-35?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KTP vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


