Finland - YkkösliigaArto Tolsa AreenaData current as of September 06, 2026

KTP vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics

KTP crest
KTP
1 : 0half-time 1:0
SJK Akatemia crest
SJK Akatemia

KTP vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

KTP played against SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 29, 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

KTP has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. SJK Akatemia has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

KTP scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 0.86. SJK Akatemia scores 0.50 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 29% of KTP's games and 25% of SJK Akatemia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 25%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 35% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

KTP has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.10 per game. KTP takes 15.1 shots per game, while SJK Akatemia takes 8.6.

First-half and second-half trends

KTP leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.38 after halftime.

When the teams score

KTP's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For SJK Akatemia, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 35% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win for KTP, as they have a 100% home win rate, score an average of 1.5 goals and concede only 0.5 goals per match at home, with a home xG of 1.81. In their last 5 matches KTP have won 4 and lost 1 (form: WLWWW), scoring 7 goals in those five games and averaging 2.4 points per match over that period. SJK Akatemia have only 1 win, 2 draws and 5 losses this season; they have no away wins, score 0.75 goals and concede 1.75 goals per away match, and have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 games. Quality of chances also favors the hosts: KTP average 5 shots on target and 14.5 shots overall with a conversion rate around 10%, while SJK average 2 on target and 8.25 shots with a conversion of about 9% and have failed to score in 50% of their away matches. Considering the possession advantage (56% vs 49%), higher xG (1.81 vs 1.04) and the hosts’ superior defense (0.5 conceded vs 1.75 for the visitors), I estimate probabilities of: 75% for KTP, 15% for a draw and 10% for a SJK win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Signals strongly oppose BTTS: KTP at home has a seasonal goals average of only 0.25 and a seasonal BTTS rate of 0%, indicating a strong tendency toward single-sided scorelines for the hosts. SJK Akatemia has a seasonal away BTTS of 50%, but in the last 5 matches overall records BTTS 0%, scoring just 2 goals (0.4 per match) and conceding 2.2 on average, so visitors rarely reply on the scoresheet. KTP in the last 5 has average xG 1.8 and has scored 7 goals (1.4 avg), while SJK in that period has had xG against 1.5, suggesting any potential goal threat is more likely to come from the home side rather than the visitors. Additionally, the league posts BTTS at 35% with as many as 75% of matches producing a clean sheet, so statistically one team more often fails to score; given KTP’s 0% seasonal home BTTS and SJK’s 0% BTTS in the last 5, I estimate 70% for 'No' and 30% for 'BTTS - Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate expected goals at 1.49 for KTP and 1.15 for SJK Akatemia (total 2.64), based on seasonal xG averages (1.17 and 1.04) and xG from the last 5 matches (1.8 and 1.25). A Poisson model with λ=2.64 yields approximately a 74% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 49% for ≥3 goals (Over 2.5) and roughly 27% for ≥4 goals (Over 3.5). Additionally, both teams averaged 2.6 goals per match over the last 5 games (KTP 1.4 scored + 1.2 conceded; SJK 0.4 scored + 2.2 conceded) and the home side averages 3.0 shots on target versus 2.0 for the away team, confirming moderate attacking activity. Offsetting this is low seasonal finishing efficiency (KTP 0.25 goals/match, SJK 0.75) and differences in clean sheets (KTP 25% of matches with a clean sheet, SJK 0%), which reduce the likelihood of a very high-scoring game. As a result, the strongest and safest signal from the data is to back Over 1.5 (line 1.5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics indicate the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time: the home side drew at the break in 50% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home=50) and in the last 5 games the Half-Time draw occurred in 60% of cases (last5_drawingAtHTPercentage_overall_home=60), whereas the home team led at the break in only 25% of seasonal matches (leadingAtHTPercentage_home=25) and 20% in the last 5 (last5_leadingAtHTPercentage_overall_home=20). After the break KTP, however, has a clear advantage: in the last 5 matches the home side won 80% of games (last5_winPercentage_overall_home=80) and scored on average 1.0 goals after Half-Time (last5_scored_2hg_avg_overall_home=1.0) versus 0.4 second-half goals for SJK (last5_scored_2hg_avg_overall_away=0.4). Additionally, the home xG of 1.17 versus 1.04 for the away side and 3.0 shots on target for the hosts versus 2.0 for SJK suggest KTP creates more goal-scoring opportunities. On this basis the strongest signal is a Half-Time draw followed by a home turnaround to win Full-Time (X/1), which I reflect as the highest probability for this option. Other scenarios (home leading from the start or an away win) appear less likely given the higher short-form win rate for the home team and higher Half-Time and second-half points (HTPoints_home=5 vs HTPoints_away=2, last5_ppg_2hg_overall_home=2.0 vs last5_ppg_2hg_overall_away=0.6).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
KTPSJK Akatemia
21Shots11
KTPSJK Akatemia
8Shots on target0
KTPSJK Akatemia
2.41xG1.16
KTPSJK Akatemia
10Corners3
KTPSJK Akatemia
74Dangerous attacks64
KTPSJK Akatemia
11Fouls7
KTPSJK Akatemia
1Cards0
KTPSJK Akatemia

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.14Goals scored / game0.5
KTPSJK Akatemia
0.86Goals allowed / game1.38
KTPSJK Akatemia
52%Average possession49%
KTPSJK Akatemia
4.14Shots on target / game2.5
KTPSJK Akatemia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.14Shots per game8.63
KTPSJK Akatemia
4.14Shots on target2.5
KTPSJK Akatemia
7.5%Shot conversion5.8%
KTPSJK Akatemia
52%Possession49%
KTPSJK Akatemia
1.7xG for1.1
KTPSJK Akatemia
1.1xG against1.55
KTPSJK Akatemia

Shooting quality

KTP: AttackingSJK Akatemia: Balanced
KTPSJK Akatemia
Accuracy (shots on target)27%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

KTP is 1100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / game - KTP · 0.2 pts / game - SJK Akatemia

KTP
WLWWW
Season result split
71% W14% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-1-1
2.29 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
SJK Akatemia
LDLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
13% W25% R63% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-5
0.63 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-2
Last 5 away
0-2-2
DLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 128% better for: goals scored per game.

1.14 goals / game - KTP · 0.5 goals / game - SJK Akatemia

KTP is 60% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.86 goals / game - KTP · 1.38 goals / game - SJK Akatemia

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 meczów), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).

SJK Akatemia scoring profile: more difficult

SJK Akatemia scores in 38% of games (3 of 8 meczów), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 meczów).

8Goals scored (season)4
KTPSJK Akatemia
6Goals conceded (season)11
KTPSJK Akatemia
2Average goals per game1.88
KTPSJK Akatemia
7Goals scored (last 5)1
KTPSJK Akatemia
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
KTPSJK Akatemia

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal38%
KTPSJK Akatemia
29%2 goals13%
KTPSJK Akatemia
0%3 goals0%
KTPSJK Akatemia
0%4 goals0%
KTPSJK Akatemia

How often they concede at least...

29%1 goal88%
KTPSJK Akatemia
14%2 goals38%
KTPSJK Akatemia
14%3 goals13%
KTPSJK Akatemia
14%4 goals0%
KTPSJK Akatemia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time0%
KTPSJK Akatemia
14%BTTS in both halves0%
KTPSJK Akatemia
14%Scored in both halves0%
KTPSJK Akatemia

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS13%
KTPSJK Akatemia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
KTPSJK Akatemia
40%BTTS - last 520%
KTPSJK Akatemia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

29%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KTPSJK Akatemia
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
KTPSJK Akatemia
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KTPSJK Akatemia

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
KTPSJK Akatemia
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
KTPSJK Akatemia
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KTPSJK Akatemia

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / game - KTP · 0.88 pts / game - SJK Akatemia

KTP - half-time state
14% leading71% draw14% trailing
SJK Akatemia - half-time state
13% leading50% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per game (1st half)0.88
KTPSJK Akatemia
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.13
KTPSJK Akatemia
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
KTPSJK Akatemia
0.57Average goals (1st half)0.75
KTPSJK Akatemia
86%Clean sheet before half-time63%
KTPSJK Akatemia
71%No goal before half-time88%
KTPSJK Akatemia

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)0.75
KTPSJK Akatemia
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
KTPSJK Akatemia
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
KTPSJK Akatemia
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.13
KTPSJK Akatemia
71%Clean sheet after half-time38%
KTPSJK Akatemia
29%No goal after half-time75%
KTPSJK Akatemia

KTP - second-half results

57% W29% R14% P
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding507%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

SJK Akatemia - second-half results

13% W38% R50% P
7
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

KTP - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.00
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
SJK Akatemia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.20
Goals scored / game0.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game0.41.4
1 goal20%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-2-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

KTP
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
2
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

SJK Akatemia
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
4
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.94
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
27%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

SJK Akatemia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
51%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KTPLigaSJK Akatemia
Average goals per game 2.002.17 1.88
Both teams scored 29%35% 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%35% 25%
Clean sheets 71%38% 13%
Goal before half-time 29%53% 50%
Goal after half-time 71%65% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per game
35%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.20
Home goals / game
0.98
Away goals / game
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPYellow cardDerrick Atta Agyei
  2. SJK AkatemiaSubstitutionOn: Daniel MbumbaOff: Abdu Muchipay
  3. KTPSubstitutionOn: Atomu TanakaOff: Gift Okarigbedi Sunday

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of KTP vs SJK Akatemia?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 1:0 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs SJK Akatemia?

KTP score 1.14 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.50. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 29% of KTP's matches and 25% of SJK Akatemia's.

What form are KTP and SJK Akatemia in?

Over the last 5 games KTP have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs SJK Akatemia?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.