KTP vs SJK Akatemia: match statistics
KTP vs SJK Akatemia: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KTP play SJK Akatemia in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match date is 29 May 2026 at 17:30. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. SJK Akatemia: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
KTP scores 1.67 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. SJK Akatemia scores 0.47 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.47 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KTP 40%, SJK Akatemia 27%. Over 2.5: KTP 40%, SJK Akatemia 20%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.20. KTP: 15.3 shots per match, SJK Akatemia: 9.3.
Match halves
KTP: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.07. SJK Akatemia: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.40.
Goals by minute
KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). SJK Akatemia: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
I predict a home win for KTP, as they have a 100% home win rate, score an average of 1.5 goals and concede only 0.5 goals per match at home, with a home xG of 1.81. In their last 5 matches KTP have won 4 and lost 1 (form: WLWWW), scoring 7 goals in those five games and averaging 2.4 points per match over that period. SJK Akatemia have only 1 win, 2 draws and 5 losses this season; they have no away wins, score 0.75 goals and concede 1.75 goals per away match, and have conceded 11 goals in their last 5 games. Quality of chances also favors the hosts: KTP average 5 shots on target and 14.5 shots overall with a conversion rate around 10%, while SJK average 2 on target and 8.25 shots with a conversion of about 9% and have failed to score in 50% of their away matches. Considering the possession advantage (56% vs 49%), higher xG (1.81 vs 1.04) and the hosts’ superior defense (0.5 conceded vs 1.75 for the visitors), I estimate probabilities of: 75% for KTP, 15% for a draw and 10% for a SJK win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 400% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - KTP · 0.4 pts / match - SJK Akatemia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KTP is 255% better for: goals scored per match.
1.67 goals / match - KTP · 0.47 goals / match - SJK Akatemia
KTP is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - KTP · 1.33 goals / match - SJK Akatemia
KTP scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
SJK Akatemia scores in 33% of matches (5 of 15 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 47% (7 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — KTP
Over / Under — SJK Akatemia
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 82% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - KTP · 0.73 pts / match - SJK Akatemia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KTP
SJK Akatemia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | SJK Akatemia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.67 | 2.47 | ▼ 1.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 44% | ▼ 20% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 31% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | • 60% | 60% | ▼ 47% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 73% | • 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs SJK Akatemia?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 1:0 SJK Akatemia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs SJK Akatemia?
KTP score 1.67 goals per game on average and SJK Akatemia 0.47. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 40% of KTP's matches and 27% of SJK Akatemia's.
What form are KTP and SJK Akatemia in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and SJK Akatemia 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs SJK Akatemia?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.