Kun Khalifat vs Shooting Stars: match statistics
Kun Khalifat as the home team demonstrates solid home form with a 33% win rate and only 25% of matches without a goal scored. Despite occupying 20th place in the table, their home record is significantly better than their overall position suggests, with an average of 1.0 goals per match and a goal difference of -1. Shooting Stars perform very poorly in away matches, with a mere 17% win rate and as many as 67% of matches without scoring a goal. The visitors average only 0.42 goals away from home with a goal difference of -9, making them one of the weakest teams on the road. Possession is balanced (51% vs 49%), but the hosts' advantage in shooting accuracy (10% vs 4%) along with their significantly better home form point to a Kun Khalifat victory. Taking all statistics into account, I expect a tough match with a slight home advantage.
Kun Khalifat vs Shooting Stars: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kun Khalifat played against Shooting Stars in NPFL (Nigeria). The game was played on February 8, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Kun Khalifat has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Shooting Stars has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Kun Khalifat scores 0.79 goals per game and allows 1.25. Shooting Stars scores 0.87 and allows 0.83. Games in this league average 1.85 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Kun Khalifat's games and 30% of Shooting Stars's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 22%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shooting Stars has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.13 per game. Kun Khalifat takes 5.5 shots per game, while Shooting Stars takes 7.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Kun Khalifat leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. Shooting Stars leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kun Khalifat's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Shooting Stars, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NPFL games average 1.85 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kun Khalifat as the home team demonstrates solid home form with a 33% win rate and only 25% of matches without a goal scored. Despite occupying 20th place in the table, their home record is significantly better than their overall position suggests, with an average of 1.0 goals per match and a goal difference of -1. Shooting Stars perform very poorly in away matches, with a mere 17% win rate and as many as 67% of matches without scoring a goal. The visitors average only 0.42 goals away from home with a goal difference of -9, making them one of the weakest teams on the road. Possession is balanced (51% vs 49%), but the hosts' advantage in shooting accuracy (10% vs 4%) along with their significantly better home form point to a Kun Khalifat victory. Taking all statistics into account, I expect a tough match with a slight home advantage.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kun Khalifat | Shooting Stars | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Shooting Stars is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Kun Khalifat · 1.2 pts / game - Shooting Stars
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shooting Stars is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
0.79 goals / game - Kun Khalifat · 0.87 goals / game - Shooting Stars
Shooting Stars is 51% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Kun Khalifat · 0.83 goals / game - Shooting Stars
Kun Khalifat scores in 63% of games (15 of 24 meczów), while Shooting Stars keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 meczów).
Shooting Stars scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 meczów), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kun Khalifat
Over / Under - Shooting Stars
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shooting Stars is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / game - Kun Khalifat · 1.3 pts / game - Shooting Stars
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kun Khalifat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Shooting Stars - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kun Khalifat
Shooting Stars
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Kun Khalifat | Liga | Shooting Stars | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.04 | 1.85 | ▼ 1.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 36% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▼ 22% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 38% | ▼ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 61% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 75% | 59% | ▼ 52% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Kun Khalifat's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Shooting Stars. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kun Khalifat vs Shooting Stars?
The NPFL match finished Kun Khalifat 2:0 Shooting Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kun Khalifat vs Shooting Stars?
Kun Khalifat score 0.79 goals per game on average and Shooting Stars 0.87. The NPFL average is 1.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Kun Khalifat's matches and 30% of Shooting Stars's.
What form are Kun Khalifat and Shooting Stars in?
Over the last 5 games Kun Khalifat have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Shooting Stars 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kun Khalifat vs Shooting Stars?
The statistical background for Kun Khalifat vs Shooting Stars — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.