KuPS vs HJK: match statistics
KuPS vs HJK: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KuPS played against HJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
KuPS has 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.50 points per game. HJK has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
KuPS scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. HJK scores 2.00 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 2.46 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of KuPS's games and 0% of HJK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KuPS has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.62 per game. KuPS takes 14.5 shots per game, while HJK takes 13.3.
First-half and second-half trends
KuPS leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 1.25 goals per game after halftime. HJK leads at halftime in 67% and scores 1.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
KuPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For HJK, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Veikkausliiga games average 2.46 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win for KuPS. KuPS has 8 goals this season and is creating significantly more attacking opportunities: averaging 19 shots and 8 on target at home versus HJK’s 9 shots and 5 on target away (HJK 6 goals this season). KuPS posts higher expected goals: xG 2.26 vs 1.39 for HJK, indicating superior chance quality, while HJK’s reported average of 3 goals away with a 33% conversion may be a short-term anomaly. Defensively KuPS concedes on average 1 goal at home with xG against 1.16 and keeps a clean sheet in 50% of matches, whereas HJK records 0 goals conceded on the road and 100% clean sheets, although HJK conceded 4 goals in the last 5 matches compared to KuPS’s 9 conceded in the same period. Considering KuPS’s 64% possession, 2.0 points per game for KuPS over the last 5 matches vs 1.8 for HJK, and the advantage in xG and shot volume, I favor KuPS to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess the “No” (No Goal / clean sheet expected) scenario as more likely because HJK averages 3.0 goals scored per season while conceding 0.0, maintaining 100.0% clean sheets, which significantly reduces the probability of BTTS - Yes. Season BTTS rates for both clubs are 0.0% (KuPS 0.0%, HJK 0.0%) versus a league BTTS average of 50.0%, so individual profiles favor no mutual scoring. A counterargument is KuPS form — in the last 5 matches KuPS has BTTS 60.0%, scored 8 and conceded 9 (avg 1.6 for, 1.8 against), showing they can concede. Still, HJK is highly efficient and defensively stable: a conversion rate of 33.0% with an average of 9.0 shots and xG_for 1.39 vs xG_against 0.76 suggests HJK will likely score while their defense limits opponents’ chances. Considering HJK’s 100.0% clean sheets, season 0.0% BTTS for both teams and relatively low HJK xG_against, I rate “No” as the stronger signal (75% vs 25%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
An xG-based model projects 1.25 goals for KuPS (attacking xG 1.74 vs HJK defensive xG 0.76) and 1.25 for HJK (attacking xG 1.39 vs KuPS defense 1.11), totaling 2.50 expected goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.50 yields ~71% probability for Over 1.5 goals (P(0 or 1) ≈ 28.7%), ~46% for Over 2.5 and ~24% for Over 3.5. Additionally, HJK has a seasonal away average of 3.0 goals and a shot conversion rate of 33% versus KuPS’s 10%, and in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 rates are ~60% for KuPS and 80% for HJK, which supports at least two goals. KuPS generates significantly more shots (15.5 vs 9.0) and has 50% clean sheets at home, which limits the likelihood of a very high scoreline above 3.5 (~24%), therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics clearly favor HJK: the away team averages 3.0 goals per away match with 0.0 conceded, has a 100% away-win rate and led at the break in 100% of their games, which suggests a strong advantage already after 45 minutes. KuPS at home averages 1.5 goals scored and 0.5 conceded, led at the break in 50% of matches, and despite a higher xG (1.74 versus 1.39) has lower shot conversion (10% vs 33%), so the xG advantage does not translate into goals. In second halves HJK records on average 2.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded, which increases the likelihood of maintaining or extending a lead. Based on this I rate the HT/FT 2/2 outcome as most likely. I assign it a 51% probability; alternatives are X/2 (9%) and 1/2 (10%), and I assess remaining scenarios collectively at about 30%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KuPS | HJK | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KuPS is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2.5 pts / game - KuPS · 2 pts / game - HJK
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
HJK is 203% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - KuPS · 0.33 goals / game - HJK
KuPS scores in 100% of games (4 of 4 meczów), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 meczów).
HJK scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KuPS
Over / Under - HJK
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
HJK is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - KuPS · 2 pts / game - HJK
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KuPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 75%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
HJK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.25 | 2.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 100% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KuPS
HJK
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| KuPS | Liga | HJK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.46 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 50% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 29% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 71% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 83% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KuPS's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against HJK. Games average 2.25 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KuPS vs HJK?
The Veikkausliiga match finished KuPS 1:1 HJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and HJK?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches KuPS won 3, HJK won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs HJK?
KuPS score 2.00 goals per game on average and HJK 2.00. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 75% of KuPS's matches and 0% of HJK's.
What form are KuPS and HJK in?
Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 3-1-0 record (2.50 points per game) and HJK 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs HJK?
The statistical background for KuPS vs HJK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.