KuPS vs TPS: match statistics
KuPS vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KuPS played against TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 9, 2026. Venue: Savon Sanomat Areena. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
KuPS has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. TPS has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
KuPS scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 0.89. TPS scores 1.28 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of KuPS's games and 50% of TPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 50%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KuPS has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.44 per game. KuPS takes 15.7 shots per game, while TPS takes 11.6.
First-half and second-half trends
KuPS leads at halftime in 56% of its games and scores 0.72 goals per game after halftime. TPS leads at halftime in 22% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
KuPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For TPS, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Veikkausliiga games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KuPS lead the table with a record of 11 wins, 6 draws, and just 1 defeat, while TPS sit in 8th place after 7 wins and 7 losses. The hosts win 67% of their home matches, score an average of 2.00 goals, and have not lost a single game, whereas TPS are still without an away victory, scoring just 0.63 goals per match. KuPS also hold the edge in chance creation, averaging 15.11 shots and 5.33 shots on target, with an xG of 1.74, compared with 12.25 shots, 4 shots on target, and an xG of 1.49 for the visitors. TPS fail to score in 50% of their away matches, while their defense concedes an average of 1.38 goals and allows opponents an xG of 1.40, which favors the hosts. The last five matches also slightly favor KuPS, who won 3 games and conceded just 4 goals, compared with 2 wins for TPS and 7 goals conceded.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
KuPS show a clearly better balance than TPS: they average 1.8 goals scored and only 0.9 conceded, while keeping a clean sheet in 50% of their matches. The biggest argument against BTTS - Yes is TPS's poor attacking efficiency: they average just 0.63 goals per game this season, have failed to score in 50% of their matches, and have a shot conversion rate of only 5%. KuPS's current form further supports this scenario, having conceded just 4 goals in their last 5 matches, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of those games. TPS have recorded an xG of 1.58 across their last five appearances, but they are facing a team that regularly keeps clean sheets, making it more likely that at least one side will fail to score. Therefore, the BTTS - No outcome is preferred; this does not automatically mean a 0:0 draw, only that at least one team is expected not to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
KuPS averages 1.8 goals at home, while TPS concedes 1.38 goals away, giving the hosts a solid projection of around 1.55 goals. At the same time, TPS scored only 0.63 goals per match during the away season, and KuPS kept a clean sheet in 50% of their matches, so the visitors’ attacking potential remains limited despite averaging 1.6 goals scored in their last five games. Across the full season, the matches involving both teams finished under 3.5 goals in 80% and 75% of cases, respectively, and neither team recorded matches involving at least four goals scored or conceded. The projected total of 2.40 goals points to a game with a realistic chance of two or three goals, but a significantly lower risk of four, making Under 3.5 the best option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KuPS has a clear advantage over the course of the season: they win 70% of their matches and average 2.2 points per game, while TPS have not won a single match and average just 0.38 points. The hosts score an average of 1.80 goals, whereas TPS manage only 0.63 away from home, while also conceding 1.38 goals per match. KuPS were already leading at the break in 40% of their matches, scoring an average of 0.90 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 70% of first halves, whereas TPS have not led at half-time even once and score just 0.25 goals on average. In their last five matches, KuPS went into half-time with the lead three times, while their defense conceded an average of only 0.20 goals in the first half. Therefore, the most likely scenario is that the hosts will take the lead before half-time and hold on to it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KuPS | TPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KuPS is 150% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - KuPS · 1.2 pts / game - TPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KuPS is 43% better for: goals scored per game.
1.83 goals / game - KuPS · 1.28 goals / game - TPS
KuPS is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.89 goals / game - KuPS · 1.11 goals / game - TPS
KuPS scores in 89% of games (16 of 18 games), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 games).
TPS scores in 78% of games (14 of 18 games), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KuPS
Over / Under - TPS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KuPS is 83% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.94 pts / game - KuPS · 1.06 pts / game - TPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KuPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 61%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
TPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +10 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KuPS
TPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| KuPS | Liga | TPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.72 | 2.63 | ▼ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 50% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 47% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 28% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 76% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 77% | • 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KuPS's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against TPS. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KuPS vs TPS?
The Veikkausliiga match finished KuPS 1:1 TPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs TPS?
KuPS score 1.83 goals per game on average and TPS 1.28. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 61% of KuPS's matches and 50% of TPS's.
What form are KuPS and TPS in?
Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and TPS 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs TPS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


