KVC Westerlo vs Zulte-Waregem: match statistics
KVC Westerlo vs Zulte-Waregem: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
KVC Westerlo played against Zulte-Waregem in Pro League (Belgium). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Het Kuipje. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
KVC Westerlo has 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Zulte-Waregem has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.33 points per game.
Scoring records
KVC Westerlo scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 4.00. Zulte-Waregem scores 2.00 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 3.31 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of KVC Westerlo's games and 33% of Zulte-Waregem's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 67%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Zulte-Waregem has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.43 per game. KVC Westerlo takes 13.7 shots per game, while Zulte-Waregem takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
KVC Westerlo leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Zulte-Waregem leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
KVC Westerlo's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Zulte-Waregem, it is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Pro League games average 3.31 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Zulte-Waregem sit 3rd and remain unbeaten in the league (2 wins, 1 draw), while KVC Westerlo are 18th with three defeats in three matches. The visitors have won 4 of their last 5 games, scoring 11 goals and conceding just 4 over that period, whereas Westerlo have lost five consecutive matches with a 4:16 goal difference. The hosts’ defense looks particularly vulnerable: they concede an average of 5 goals per home game, while their xG conceded stands at 2.26. Zulte-Waregem generate chances worth an average of 1.26 xG away from home, and their defense allows opponents just 1.16 xG, which should be enough to exploit Westerlo’s clear weaknesses. Some caution is warranted given that the visitors’ only away match ended in a 0:0 draw; however, the current form of both teams clearly points towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both sides to score is driven primarily by current form: BTTS landed in 60% of matches for both teams over their last 5 games. Zulte-Waregem averaged 2.2 goals scored during this period, while Westerlo conceded as many as 3.2 goals per game, significantly increasing the visitors’ chances of finding the net. The hosts scored only 0.8 goals per game across their last five appearances, but their average xG stands at 1.53, while Zulte-Waregem allows opponents an xG of 1.36, meaning Westerlo should create genuine chances. The visitors’ solid defense, with an average of 0.8 goals conceded in their last 5 matches, reduces confidence in the pick; however, Westerlo’s very weak defense and Zulte-Waregem’s attacking form tilt the forecast slightly towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Westerlo’s last five matches produced an average of 4.0 goals, as the team scored just 0.8 goals but conceded as many as 3.2. Zulte-Waregem are in significantly better offensive form: over the same period, they averaged 2.2 goals scored, while their opponents conceded an average of 0.8 goals against them. Chance-quality models indicate 1.53 xG for Westerlo and 1.58 xG for Zulte-Waregem across their last five matches, supporting a projected total of 3.17 goals. The 2.5 line was covered in 80% of the last five matches played by both teams, while the league-wide average stands at a high 3.29 goals. However, the strongest pick remains Over 1.5 goals, as even with lower home finishing efficiency, the visitors’ attacking strength and Westerlo’s highly vulnerable defense significantly reduce the risk of a match producing no more than one goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is Zulte-Waregem’s current form: the visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, winning four of them and averaging 2.2 goals scored, while Westerlo have lost all five of their games, averaging 0.8 goals scored and 3.2 conceded per match. Before half-time, the hosts were trailing in three of their last five appearances, conceding an average of 1.6 goals, whereas the visitors held a lead at the break in 40% of those matches and conceded just 0.6 goals. The difference remains clear after the interval: Westerlo failed to score in the second halves of their last five matches and conceded an average of 1.6 goals during those periods, while Zulte-Waregem scored 1.4 goals and kept a clean sheet in 80% of such halves. Although Westerlo’s previous home data is very strong, it is based on a small sample, and the current trend of both teams provides significantly stronger support for the visitors to lead at the break and secure the final victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| KVC Westerlo | Zulte-Waregem | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 22% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Zulte-Waregem is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - KVC Westerlo · 2 goals / game - Zulte-Waregem
Zulte-Waregem is 1112% better for: goals allowed per game.
4 goals / game - KVC Westerlo · 0.33 goals / game - Zulte-Waregem
KVC Westerlo scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Zulte-Waregem keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).
Zulte-Waregem scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while KVC Westerlo keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KVC Westerlo
Over / Under - Zulte-Waregem
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Zulte-Waregem is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - KVC Westerlo · 1.33 pts / game - Zulte-Waregem
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KVC Westerlo - second-half results
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Zulte-Waregem - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.67 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.7 | 2.3 |
| Average goals per game | 2.7 | 2.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 2.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 1.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 100% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
KVC Westerlo
Zulte-Waregem
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Pro League).
Teams vs league
| KVC Westerlo | Liga | Zulte-Waregem | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 5.00 | 3.31 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 53% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 25% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 88% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from KVC Westerlo's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Zulte-Waregem. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of KVC Westerlo vs Zulte-Waregem?
The Pro League match finished KVC Westerlo 2:2 Zulte-Waregem. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KVC Westerlo and Zulte-Waregem?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches KVC Westerlo won 2, Zulte-Waregem won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KVC Westerlo vs Zulte-Waregem?
KVC Westerlo score 1.00 goals per game on average and Zulte-Waregem 2.00. The Pro League average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 67% of KVC Westerlo's matches and 33% of Zulte-Waregem's.
What form are KVC Westerlo and Zulte-Waregem in?
Over the last 5 games KVC Westerlo have a 0-0-3 record (0.00 points per game) and Zulte-Waregem 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KVC Westerlo vs Zulte-Waregem?
The statistical background for KVC Westerlo vs Zulte-Waregem — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


