Kyoto Sanga vs Vissel Kobe: match statistics
Kyoto Sanga vs Vissel Kobe: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Kyoto Sanga played against Vissel Kobe in J1 League (Japan). The game was played on December 6, 2025. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Kyoto Sanga has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Vissel Kobe has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Kyoto Sanga scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 1.08. Vissel Kobe scores 1.24 and allows 0.84. Games in this league average 2.39 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Kyoto Sanga's games and 43% of Vissel Kobe's. The Over 2.5 rates are 51% and 41%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Vissel Kobe has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.38 per game. Kyoto Sanga takes 11.8 shots per game, while Vissel Kobe takes 13.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Kyoto Sanga leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.97 goals per game after halftime. Vissel Kobe leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.78 after halftime.
When the teams score
Kyoto Sanga's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (16 goals). For Vissel Kobe, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J1 League games average 2.39 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Kyoto Sanga | Vissel Kobe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kyoto Sanga is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Kyoto Sanga · 0.8 pts / game - Vissel Kobe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kyoto Sanga is 31% better for: goals scored per game.
1.62 goals / game - Kyoto Sanga · 1.24 goals / game - Vissel Kobe
Vissel Kobe is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - Kyoto Sanga · 0.84 goals / game - Vissel Kobe
Kyoto Sanga scores in 86% of games (32 of 37 meczów), while Vissel Kobe keeps a clean sheet in 38% (14 of 37 meczów).
Vissel Kobe scores in 68% of games (25 of 37 meczów), while Kyoto Sanga keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 37 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kyoto Sanga
Over / Under - Vissel Kobe
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kyoto Sanga is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / game - Kyoto Sanga · 1.27 pts / game - Vissel Kobe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kyoto Sanga - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 49%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Vissel Kobe - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 49%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Kyoto Sanga
Vissel Kobe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Kyoto Sanga | Liga | Vissel Kobe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.70 | 2.39 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 46% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 51% | 44% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 31% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 60% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 75% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Kyoto Sanga's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Vissel Kobe. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Kyoto Sanga vs Vissel Kobe?
The J1 League match finished Kyoto Sanga 2:0 Vissel Kobe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kyoto Sanga vs Vissel Kobe?
Kyoto Sanga score 1.62 goals per game on average and Vissel Kobe 1.24. The J1 League average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Kyoto Sanga's matches and 43% of Vissel Kobe's.
What form are Kyoto Sanga and Vissel Kobe in?
Over the last 5 games Kyoto Sanga have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Vissel Kobe 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyoto Sanga vs Vissel Kobe?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.