Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueStadion KarasayData current as of 23 July 2026

Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol: match statistics

Kyzyl-Zhar crest
Kyzyl-Zhar
1 : 1half-time 1:1
Tobol crest
Tobol

Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kyzyl-Zhar play Tobol in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match date is 18 July 2026 at 15:00. Venue: Stadion Karasay. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Kyzyl-Zhar: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Tobol: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.00 and concedes 1.44 goals per match. Tobol scores 1.11 and concedes 1.44. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kyzyl-Zhar 44%, Tobol 61%. Over 2.5: Kyzyl-Zhar 50%, Tobol 50%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Tobol has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.18. Kyzyl-Zhar: 10.0 shots per match, Tobol: 13.3.

Match halves

Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.72. Tobol: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Kyzyl-Zhar: 76-90+ (6 goals). Tobol: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Tobol holds a clear form advantage: in the last 5 matches they have won 3, lost 2 and scored 9 goals, averaging 1.8 points per match, whereas Kyzyl-Zhar have lost all 5 recent fixtures, scoring only 2 goals and conceding 12 (an average of 2.4 goals conceded per match) and collecting 0 points in that period. At home Kyzyl-Zhar averages 1.67 goals and xG 1.26 with 4.56 shots on target and a conversion rate of 16%, but also concedes 1.67 goals per match; the visitors on the road generate a similar xG of 1.33 and more attempts (11.89 shots), yet score only 0.56 goals per match on average and have a low conversion of 5%. Tobol additionally maintains higher possession (53% vs 48%) and has been earning more points recently (1.8 vs 0 points per match), which translates into better game control and chance creation. On the other hand Kyzyl-Zhar have a lower share of home matches without scoring (22% vs 44% for Tobol away) and a better home conversion, but a run of 5 straight losses and 12 goals conceded is a significant burden. Considering Tobol’s momentum (9 vs 2 goals over 5 matches) and the hosts’ dreadful run, I tip the away win; therefore I assign 55% probability to Tobol, 25% to a draw and 20% to Kyzyl-Zhar.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

32Possession (%)68
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
19Shots12
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
7Shots on target5
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
1.99xG1.52
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
4Corners4
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
44Dangerous attacks58
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
9Fouls18
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
2Cards1
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.11
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
1.44Goals conceded / match1.44
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
44%Average possession55%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
3.83Shots on target / match4.11
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10Shots per match13.28
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
3.83Shots on target4.11
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
10%Shot conversion8.4%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
44%Possession55%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
1.18xG for1.55
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
1.51xG against1.54
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

Shooting quality

Kyzyl-Zhar: BalancedTobol: Balanced
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
Accuracy (shots on target)38%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tobol is 600% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.4 pts / match - Tobol

Kyzyl-Zhar
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
22% W22% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-10
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tobol
LWLWD
Season result split
28% W22% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-9
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tobol is 11% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.11 goals / match - Tobol

Kyzyl-Zhar scoring profile: very strong

Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 56% of matches (10 of 18 matches), while Tobol keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 18 matches).

Tobol scoring profile: very strong

Tobol scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 22% (4 of 18 matches).

18Goals scored (season)20
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
26Goals conceded (season)26
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
2.44Average goals in match2.56
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
3Goals scored (last 5)8
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal72%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
28%2 goals28%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
11%3 goals11%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
6%4 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal89%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
50%2 goals39%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
11%3 goals11%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
6%4 goals6%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time33%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
11%Scored in both halves11%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
40%BTTS - last 580%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

39%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
61%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tobol is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.28 pts / match - Tobol

Kyzyl-Zhar - half-time state
11% leading72% draw17% trailing
Tobol - half-time state
22% leading61% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.28
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
0.28Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
0.61Average goals (1st half)1.06
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
72%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
78%No goal before half-time50%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)0.94
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
1.83Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
39%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol
56%No goal after half-time67%
Kyzyl-ZharTobol

Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results

17% W39% R44% P
19
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tobol - second-half results

22% W28% R50% P
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kyzyl-Zhar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.20
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.6
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Tobol - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kyzyl-Zhar
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
5
46-60
3
3
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Tobol
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
3
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
8
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kyzyl-Zhar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.69
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Tobol

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kyzyl-ZharLigaTobol
Average goals in match 2.442.31 2.56
Both teams scored 44%52% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%42% 50%
Clean sheets 22%29% 11%
Goal before half-time 39%62% 61%
Goal after half-time 78%70% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Kyzyl-Zhar 0 - 0 - 3 Tobol. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Tobol
2 : 0
Kyzyl-Zhar
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
0 : 2
FK Tobol Kostanay
FK Tobol Kostanay
2 : 1
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk

FAQ

What was the result of Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kyzyl-Zhar 1:1 Tobol. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kyzyl-Zhar and Tobol?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kyzyl-Zhar won 0, Tobol won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol?

Kyzyl-Zhar score 1.00 goals per game on average and Tobol 1.11. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Kyzyl-Zhar's matches and 61% of Tobol's.

What form are Kyzyl-Zhar and Tobol in?

Over the last 5 games Kyzyl-Zhar have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Tobol 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.