LA Galaxy vs Colorado Rapids: match statistics
LA Galaxy vs Colorado Rapids: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
LA Galaxy played against Colorado Rapids in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 27, 2026. Venue: Dignity Health Sports Park. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
LA Galaxy has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Colorado Rapids has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
LA Galaxy scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.56. Colorado Rapids scores 1.38 and allows 1.35. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 74% of LA Galaxy's games and 42% of Colorado Rapids's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 46%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
LA Galaxy has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.38 per game. LA Galaxy takes 12.9 shots per game, while Colorado Rapids takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
LA Galaxy leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. Colorado Rapids leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.81 after halftime.
When the teams score
LA Galaxy's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Colorado Rapids, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
LA Galaxy have a clearly stronger home profile, averaging 1.15 goals per match, while Colorado Rapids score just 0.85 away from home. The hosts also create significantly more chances, averaging 13.54 shots and 5.69 shots on target, compared with 8.08 shots and 3.08 on target for the visitors. Colorado lose as many as 69% of their away matches and fail to score in 46% of them, which severely limits their chances despite Galaxy’s defensive vulnerability. The Los Angeles side have recorded 7 goals and 7 points across their last five matches, while the Rapids have managed just 5 goals and 5 points over the same period. Both teams have conceded 10 goals in their last five appearances, so the hosts are not an unquestionable favorite, but the advantage in chance quality and the visitors’ poor away record point to result 1.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A scenario in which one of the teams fails to score is slightly more likely, as Colorado averages only 0.85 goals away from home and draws a blank in 46% of matches. LA Galaxy keeps a clean sheet in 54% of home games, while conceding just 0.92 goals per match at home across the season, which clearly limits the visitors’ chances. The hosts should create more opportunities, with an average xG of 1.79 compared to Colorado’s 0.97, while their shots on target average 5.31 against 3.08 for their opponents. However, LA’s current defensive form supports BTTS - Yes, as they have conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last five matches, while Colorado’s xG over that period stands at 1.45. Nevertheless, LA’s season-long BTTS rate of 38% and Colorado’s 46%, combined with the high risk of the visitors failing to score, give a slight edge to the BTTS - No pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
LA Galaxy average 1.92 goals at home, while Colorado Rapids concede an average of 1.77 goals away from home, clearly supporting the hosts’ attacking output. In their last five matches, both teams conceded 2.0 goals per game, while Galaxy matches went Over 2.5 goals in 80% of cases. Colorado have recently created chances worth an average of 1.45 xG, while Galaxy allowed opponents 2.06 xG, meaning the visitors also have a realistic chance of scoring. The 1.5 line was exceeded in 54% of Galaxy matches and 69% of Colorado matches this season, while the current defensive problems affecting both teams raise this projection to 80%. Over 1.5 is the safest choice, as the projected total of 3.00 goals provides a margin even if one side shows limited finishing efficiency.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
LA Galaxy have a clear advantage over the course of the season: they win 69% of their matches, score an average of 1.92 goals and concede only 0.92, while Colorado lose 69% of their games and concede 1.77 goals per match. The hosts also create significantly more chances, as reflected by their average xG of 1.79 compared with 0.97, as well as 5.31 shots on target versus 3.08 for the Rapids. The scenario of Galaxy leading at the break is supported by the fact that they were ahead after 45 minutes in 46% of their matches, while Colorado went into half-time behind in as many as 38% of games; the hosts concede just 0.38 goals per match before the interval. The strongest argument for completing the victory comes from the second half, in which LA Galaxy score an average of 1.31 goals and win 62% of post-break periods, whereas Colorado score only 0.31 goals and lose as many as 77% of those periods. The 1/1 pick is therefore the most consistent with the hosts' dominance from the outset and their particularly significant quality gap after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| LA Galaxy | Colorado Rapids | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Colorado Rapids is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - LA Galaxy · 1.6 pts / game - Colorado Rapids
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Rapids is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
1.26 goals / game - LA Galaxy · 1.38 goals / game - Colorado Rapids
Colorado Rapids is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.56 goals / game - LA Galaxy · 1.35 goals / game - Colorado Rapids
LA Galaxy scores in 85% of games (23 of 27 games), while Colorado Rapids keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 games).
Colorado Rapids scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 games), while LA Galaxy keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 27 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - LA Galaxy
Over / Under - Colorado Rapids
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Colorado Rapids is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / game - LA Galaxy · 1.38 pts / game - Colorado Rapids
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
LA Galaxy - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Colorado Rapids - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
LA Galaxy
Colorado Rapids
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| LA Galaxy | Liga | Colorado Rapids | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.81 | 3.21 | ▼ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 63% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 63% | 62% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 21% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 77% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 81% | ▼ 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from LA Galaxy's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Colorado Rapids. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of LA Galaxy vs Colorado Rapids?
The MLS match finished LA Galaxy 3:2 Colorado Rapids. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before LA Galaxy vs Colorado Rapids?
LA Galaxy score 1.26 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids 1.38. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 74% of LA Galaxy's matches and 42% of Colorado Rapids's.
What form are LA Galaxy and Colorado Rapids in?
Over the last 5 games LA Galaxy have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Colorado Rapids 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for LA Galaxy vs Colorado Rapids?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for LA Galaxy vs Colorado Rapids: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


