United States - MLSData current as of September 13, 2026

LA Galaxy vs Minnesota United: match statistics

LA Galaxy crest
LA Galaxy
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Minnesota United crest
Minnesota United

LA Galaxy vs Minnesota United: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

LA Galaxy played against Minnesota United in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

LA Galaxy has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Minnesota United has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

LA Galaxy scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 1.60. Minnesota United scores 0.80 and allows 2.20. Games in this league average 3.10 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 80% of LA Galaxy's games and 40% of Minnesota United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 60%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

LA Galaxy has the higher season xG average, 1.86 to 1.25 per game. LA Galaxy takes 15.6 shots per game, while Minnesota United takes 11.4.

First-half and second-half trends

LA Galaxy leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Minnesota United leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

LA Galaxy's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Minnesota United, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.10 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a LA Galaxy ('1') win based on clear superior home offensive and quality metrics: the hosts have average xG 1.70 at home versus Minnesota's 1.24 xG and register 7.67 shots on target per match compared to the visitors' 3.67. Minnesota have serious defensive issues away — conceding an average of 3.67 goals per away match, with xG against 1.65, and they have shipped 11 goals in their last five away games; additionally their away win rate is 0% and they have not kept a clean sheet. LA at home score 1.67 goals and concede 1.00, scoring at least one goal in every home match (0% matches without a goal) and holding a positive goal difference of +2 at the stadium; in the last 5 matches the hosts have scored 9 goals, translating to 1.4 points per match, whereas Minnesota have 1.0 point per match in recent fixtures. Furthermore LA control on average 53% possession at home versus Minnesota's 45% and have a higher shot conversion (13% vs 9%), suggesting the home side will create better chances and have greater scoring probability. Considering the edge in xG (1.70 vs 1.24), the defensive differential (1.00 vs 3.67 conceded) and Minnesota's lack of away wins, I estimate a 65% probability for the home win, 20% for a draw and 15% for the away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability versus 35% for No, because several key numbers favor both teams scoring. Minnesota’s away BTTS rate this season is 67% and they concede an average of 3.67 goals away, while in the last 5 matches they conceded 11 goals (2.2 per game), which significantly increases the likelihood of a goal for LA. LA has generated 2.08 xG in the last 5 matches and scored 9 goals in those games, although seasonally at home they only average 0.5 goals and have a 100% clean sheet rate at home in a small sample, yielding mixed but overall attacking signals from form. Minnesota can also score on the road (seasonScoredAVG_away 1.0, last 5 matches 0.8), and the league has an average BTTS of 51% and average goals 3.03, which supports the both-teams-to-score scenario. In summary: Minnesota’s high BTTS percentage (67%), the large number of goals conceded by Minnesota (3.67 away and 11 in the last 5) and LA’s attacking xG (2.08 in the last 5) give the edge to the “Yes” outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model combining seasonal and recent form yields a total expected goals of approximately 2.89: home ~1.68 (recent xG 2.08 vs seasonal xG 1.26) and away ~1.21 (seasonal xG 1.24 and recent xG against 1.58). LA scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches (avg 1.8) and have an xG of 2.08, while Minnesota conceded 11 goals in their last 5 (avg 2.2), which increases the likelihood of home goals. Based on a Poisson distribution with total λ=2.89 I estimate probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈78%, Over 2.5 ≈55% and Over 3.5 ≈33% (Under respectively 22%, 45%, 67%). Additionally, in the last 5 matches LA had 80% of games over 2.5 goals and Minnesota 60%, and the seasonal xG metrics of both teams are similar (1.26 vs 1.24), which supports a goal-prone tendency. Therefore the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is to back the Over at the 1.5 line — total xG 2.89 and current forms reduce the risk of under 2 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

LA Galaxy at home have 100% clean sheets (seasonCSPercentage_home = 100.0) and concede on average 0.0 goals per match (seasonConcededAVG_home = 0.0), while averaging 0.5 goals scored per match (seasonScoredAVG_home = 0.5). At half-time the hosts statistically do not score (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.0) and are drawing at home in 100% of cases (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 100.0), which strongly supports a draw at the break. Minnesota away concedes on average 3.67 goals per match (seasonConcededAVG_away = 3.67) and has 0% away wins (winPercentage_away = 0.0), additionally conceding on average 1.33 goals after the break (conceded_2hg_avg_away = 1.33). LA Galaxy score on average 0.5 goals in the second half and do not concede (scored_2hg_avg_home = 0.5, conceded_2hg_avg_home = 0.0), so the strongest signal is a draw at half-time and a home win by full-time (HT/FT: X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
20Shots9
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
7Shots on target4
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
2.25xG1.19
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
9Corners0
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
69Dangerous attacks47
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
11Fouls13
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
2Cards3
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

LA GalaxyMinnesota United
1.4Goals scored / game0.8
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
1.6Goals allowed / game2.2
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
55%Average possession42%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
7.4Shots on target / game3.8
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.6Shots per game11.4
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
7.4Shots on target3.8
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
9%Shot conversion7%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
55%Possession42%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
1.86xG for1.25
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
1.04xG against1.58
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

Shooting quality

LA Galaxy: DominantMinnesota United: Balanced
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
Accuracy (shots on target)47%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

LA Galaxy
DWLLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
DWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Minnesota United
DWLLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
DLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

LA Galaxy is 75% better for: goals scored per game.

1.4 goals / game - LA Galaxy · 0.8 goals / game - Minnesota United

LA Galaxy is 38% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.6 goals / game - LA Galaxy · 2.2 goals / game - Minnesota United

LA Galaxy scoring profile: very strong

LA Galaxy scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while Minnesota United keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 meczów).

Minnesota United scoring profile: strong

Minnesota United scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while LA Galaxy keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).

7Goals scored (season)4
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
8Goals conceded (season)11
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
3Average goals per game3
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
7Goals scored (last 5)4
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
8Goals conceded (last 5)11
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal60%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
20%2 goals20%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
20%3 goals0%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
0%4 goals0%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal60%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
40%2 goals60%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
20%3 goals40%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
20%4 goals20%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time40%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
0%BTTS in both halves20%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
0%Scored in both halves20%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
80%BTTS - last 540%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time60%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time40%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

LA Galaxy is 133% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / game - LA Galaxy · 0.6 pts / game - Minnesota United

LA Galaxy - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing
Minnesota United - half-time state
0% leading60% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per game (1st half)0.6
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
1Goals scored (1st half)0.4
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)1.4
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
1.6Average goals (1st half)1.8
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
40%Clean sheet before half-time40%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
40%No goal before half-time60%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

After half-time (2nd half)

0.6Points per game (2nd half)1
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.2
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
40%Clean sheet after half-time40%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United
60%No goal after half-time60%
LA GalaxyMinnesota United

LA Galaxy - second-half results

0% W60% D40% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Minnesota United - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.6

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

LA Galaxy - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.0
Average goals per game1.61.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Minnesota United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.00
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game1.40.8
Average goals per game1.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

LA Galaxy
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
3
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Minnesota United
ScoredConceded
0
3
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

LA Galaxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.82
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 57% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Minnesota United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

LA GalaxyLigaMinnesota United
Average goals per game 3.003.10 3.00
Both teams scored 80%52% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%62% 60%
Clean sheets 20%27% 40%
Goal before half-time 100%72% 60%
Goal after half-time 60%83% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.10
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.97
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+73%
Home attack advantage
+42%
Home defensive advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardAnthony Markanich
  2. Minnesota UnitedGoalAnthony MarkanichAssist: Joaquín Nicolás Pereyra
  3. LA GalaxyGoalMarco Reus
  4. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Devin PadelfordOff: Nicolás Romero
  5. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardMorris Duggan
  6. LA GalaxyYellow cardElijah Wynder
  7. LA GalaxySubstitutionOn: Miki YamaneOff: Mauricio Cuevas
  8. LA GalaxySubstitutionOn: Harbor MillerOff: Elijah Wynder
  9. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Kieran ChandlerOff: Anthony Markanich
  10. Minnesota UnitedSubstitutionOn: Mamadou DiengOff: Kelvin Kwarteng Yeboah
  11. LA GalaxySubstitutionOn: Maya YoshidaOff: Edwin Cerrillo
  12. Minnesota UnitedYellow cardKyle Duncan
  13. LA GalaxyYellow cardCarlos Emiro Garcés Torres

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of LA Galaxy vs Minnesota United?

The MLS match finished LA Galaxy 1:2 Minnesota United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before LA Galaxy vs Minnesota United?

LA Galaxy score 1.40 goals per game on average and Minnesota United 0.80. The MLS average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 80% of LA Galaxy's matches and 40% of Minnesota United's.

What form are LA Galaxy and Minnesota United in?

Over the last 5 games LA Galaxy have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Minnesota United 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for LA Galaxy vs Minnesota United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.