Chile - Primera DivisiónEstadio La Portada de La SerenaData current as of September 20, 2026

La Serena vs O'Higgins: match statistics

La Serena crest
La Serena
1 : 2half-time 1:0
O'Higgins crest
O'Higgins

La Serena vs O'Higgins: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

La Serena played against O'Higgins in Primera División (Chile). The game was played on August 2, 2026. Venue: Estadio La Portada de La Serena. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

La Serena has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. O'Higgins has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

La Serena scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.75. O'Higgins scores 1.19 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.85 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of La Serena's games and 44% of O'Higgins's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 44%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

O'Higgins has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.31 per game. La Serena takes 11.9 shots per game, while O'Higgins takes 13.4.

First-half and second-half trends

La Serena leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. O'Higgins leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

La Serena's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For O'Higgins, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Primera División games average 2.85 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

La Serena has a clear home advantage: at home they average 1.63 goals scored and concede 1.13 per match, while O'Higgins on the road average 1.38 scored and 1.88 conceded. Chance quality also favors the hosts — La Serena records 4.63 shots on target per match with a 15% conversion rate, versus O'Higgins' 4.13 shots on target and 13% conversion; xG for both teams is similar (1.23), but xG against is 1.30 for La Serena versus 1.73 for O'Higgins. Form is comparable (over the last 5 matches both teams have 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses and PPG 1.4), with La Serena scoring 8 goals in their last 5 matches against O'Higgins' 7, although La Serena conceded 9 in that period versus their opponents' 6. Additionally, La Serena has a lower share of matches without scoring (25% vs 38%) and a higher share of clean sheets at home (38% vs 25%), which strengthens their prospects. Considering better home defense (1.13 vs 1.88), higher conversion and greater efficiency with shots on target, I assign La Serena approximately 55% chance, draw 25% and O'Higgins win 20%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonally La Serena has BTTS in 38% of matches, O'Higgins in 50%, and the league average is 50%, so historically O'Higgins features in Goal/Goal games more often than La Serena. In the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of cases; over that period La Serena averaged 1.6 goals scored and conceded 1.8, while O'Higgins scored 1.4 and conceded 1.2. xG and shot metrics support the likelihood of goal exchange: La Serena has xG 1.76 and averages 16.5 shots (5.38 on target), whereas O'Higgins concedes xG against of 1.73; meanwhile O'Higgins has xG 1.23 and a conversion rate of 13%. Both teams have only 25% of matches with a clean sheet, and seasonally La Serena has conceded 28 goals versus 24 for O'Higgins, which increases the probability of goals conceded on both sides. Considering the 60% BTTS in the last 5, the strong xG comparisons (1.76 vs 1.73 and 1.23 vs 1.1) and the low 25% clean sheets, I assess the chance of BTTS at 72% and select BTTS - Yes as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG- and defensive-quality based model indicates 1.75 expected goals for La Serena (attacking xG 1.76 vs O'Higgins conceded xG 1.73, average ≈1.75) and 1.17 for O'Higgins (attacking xG 1.23 vs La Serena conceded xG 1.10, average ≈1.17), totaling 2.92 goals. La Serena averages 16.5 shots and 5.38 shots on target per match, while O'Higgins records 10.38 shots and 4.13 on target; O'Higgins' defense concedes 1.73 xG per match, which favors goal-scoring. Seasonal metrics confirm a propensity for goals: Over 0.5 occurred in 100% of La Serena matches and 88% of O'Higgins matches, while Over 1.5 is 50% for La Serena and 88% for O'Higgins (average 69%). A Poisson model for the expected total of 2.92 yields roughly a 79% probability for over 1.5 goals, about 56% for over 2.5 and about 33% for over 3.5, therefore I recommend the 'over' side on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal from the available data.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time with La Serena winning after 90 minutes (X/1). A draw at the break is highly probable since the half-time draw rate for both teams is 38% and average goals to half-time are 0.5 for La Serena versus 0.75 for O'Higgins, indicating only a slight advantage for the visitors in the first 45 minutes. Over the full match the hosts are the favorites: they win 50% of their games versus 25% for the visitors and average 1.5 points per match for La Serena compared to 1.0 for O'Higgins. This is corroborated by higher xG for the hosts (1.76 vs 1.23) and lower xG conceded (1.10 vs 1.73 for the opponents), as well as more shots by the hosts (16.5 vs 10.38) and more shots on target (5.38 vs 4.13), which supports a turnaround in the second half. Additionally, La Serena earns more points in second halves on average (1.25 vs 0.63) while O'Higgins concedes more goals after the break (on average 1.25), therefore I assign the highest probability to the X/1 scenario (30%); alternatives are draw/draw at 45'–90' (20%) or lead at the break and win for the hosts 1/1 (15%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

41Possession (%)59
La SerenaO'Higgins
18Shots16
La SerenaO'Higgins
5Shots on target3
La SerenaO'Higgins
1.76xG1.56
La SerenaO'Higgins
8Corners7
La SerenaO'Higgins
37Dangerous attacks45
La SerenaO'Higgins
13Fouls14
La SerenaO'Higgins
2Cards1
La SerenaO'Higgins

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

La SerenaO'Higgins
1.5Goals scored / game1.19
La SerenaO'Higgins
1.75Goals allowed / game1.5
La SerenaO'Higgins
49%Average possession51%
La SerenaO'Higgins
4.5Shots on target / game4.75
La SerenaO'Higgins

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.88Shots per game13.44
La SerenaO'Higgins
4.5Shots on target4.75
La SerenaO'Higgins
12.6%Shot conversion8.8%
La SerenaO'Higgins
49%Possession51%
La SerenaO'Higgins
1.31xG for1.49
La SerenaO'Higgins
1.47xG against1.43
La SerenaO'Higgins

Shooting quality

La Serena: BalancedO'Higgins: Balanced
La SerenaO'Higgins
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

La Serena is 400% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - La Serena · 0.2 pts / game - O'Higgins

La Serena
LWLDD
Season result split
25% W44% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-5
1.19 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
O'Higgins
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
38% W13% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-8
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

La Serena is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.5 goals / game - La Serena · 1.19 goals / game - O'Higgins

O'Higgins is 17% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.75 goals / game - La Serena · 1.5 goals / game - O'Higgins

La Serena scoring profile: very strong

La Serena scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 games), while O'Higgins keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 games).

O'Higgins scoring profile: strong

O'Higgins scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 games), while La Serena keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 games).

24Goals scored (season)19
La SerenaO'Higgins
28Goals conceded (season)24
La SerenaO'Higgins
3.25Average goals per game2.69
La SerenaO'Higgins
11Goals scored (last 5)2
La SerenaO'Higgins
14Goals conceded (last 5)8
La SerenaO'Higgins

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal63%
La SerenaO'Higgins
44%2 goals44%
La SerenaO'Higgins
25%3 goals13%
La SerenaO'Higgins
6%4 goals0%
La SerenaO'Higgins

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
La SerenaO'Higgins
44%2 goals50%
La SerenaO'Higgins
31%3 goals19%
La SerenaO'Higgins
19%4 goals6%
La SerenaO'Higgins

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time25%
La SerenaO'Higgins
6%BTTS in both halves13%
La SerenaO'Higgins
19%Scored in both halves31%
La SerenaO'Higgins

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
La SerenaO'Higgins
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
La SerenaO'Higgins
100%BTTS - last 520%
La SerenaO'Higgins

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time81%
La SerenaO'Higgins
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
La SerenaO'Higgins
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
La SerenaO'Higgins

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
La SerenaO'Higgins
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
La SerenaO'Higgins
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
La SerenaO'Higgins

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

La Serena is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / game - La Serena · 1.13 pts / game - O'Higgins

La Serena - half-time state
38% leading44% draw19% trailing
O'Higgins - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per game (1st half)1.13
La SerenaO'Higgins
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.63
La SerenaO'Higgins
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
La SerenaO'Higgins
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.25
La SerenaO'Higgins
56%Clean sheet before half-time44%
La SerenaO'Higgins
50%No goal before half-time50%
La SerenaO'Higgins

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per game (2nd half)0.94
La SerenaO'Higgins
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
La SerenaO'Higgins
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
La SerenaO'Higgins
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.44
La SerenaO'Higgins
31%Clean sheet after half-time38%
La SerenaO'Higgins
56%No goal after half-time56%
La SerenaO'Higgins

La Serena - second-half results

25% W31% D44% L
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

O'Higgins - second-half results

19% W38% D44% L
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

La Serena - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.41.8
Goals allowed / game1.21.6
Average goals per game1.63.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%80%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
O'Higgins - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.200.60
Goals scored / game0.20.2
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

La Serena
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
7
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

O'Higgins
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
3
2
16-30
4
4
31-45
3
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

La Serena

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

O'Higgins

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-1.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).

Teams vs league

La SerenaLigaO'Higgins
Average goals per game 3.252.85 2.69
Both teams scored 56%50% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%55% 44%
Clean sheets 25%28% 25%
Goal before half-time 69%73% 81%
Goal after half-time 75%76% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.85
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / game
1.15
Away goals / game
+48%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. O'HigginsYellow cardMartín Maturana
  2. La SerenaSubstitutionOn: Matías Nicolás Marín VegaOff: Felipe Chamorro
  3. O'HigginsSubstitutionOn: Joaquín TapiaOff: Martín Maturana
  4. La SerenaYellow cardSebastián Díaz Aracena
  5. La SerenaYellow cardLucas Bastián Alarcón Ancapi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from La Serena's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against O'Higgins. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

O'Higgins
1 : 0
La Serena
CD La Serena
3 : 3
CD O'Higgins
CD O'Higgins
1 : 1
CD La Serena

FAQ

What was the result of La Serena vs O'Higgins?

The Primera División match finished La Serena 1:2 O'Higgins. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between La Serena and O'Higgins?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches La Serena won 0, O'Higgins won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before La Serena vs O'Higgins?

La Serena score 1.50 goals per game on average and O'Higgins 1.19. The Primera División average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 56% of La Serena's matches and 44% of O'Higgins's.

What form are La Serena and O'Higgins in?

Over the last 5 games La Serena have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and O'Higgins 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for La Serena vs O'Higgins?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.