Greece - Super League 2Data current as of October 04, 2026

Larissa vs PAOK II: match statistics

Larissa crest
Larissa
1 : 0half-time 1:0
PAOK II crest
PAOK II

Larissa vs PAOK II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Larissa played against PAOK II in Super League 2 (Greece). The game was played on September 27, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Larissa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.33 points per game. PAOK II has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.33 points per game.

Scoring records

Larissa scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 0.33. PAOK II scores 1.00 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.25 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Larissa's games and 67% of PAOK II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Larissa has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.04 per game. Larissa takes 11.3 shots per game, while PAOK II takes 7.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Larissa leads at halftime in 67% of its games and scores 1.33 goals per game after halftime. PAOK II leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Larissa's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For PAOK II, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Super League 2 games average 2.25 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Larissa remain unbeaten this season, with 2 wins and 1 draw, having conceded just 1 goal, while PAOK II have recorded 1 win, 1 draw and 1 defeat. At home, the hosts average 1 goal scored and concede just 0.5 per match, keeping a clean sheet in 50% of such fixtures. PAOK II have lost every away game, failed to score in any of them and concede an average of 2 goals per match. Larissa’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average home xG stands at 1.22, compared with PAOK II’s away xG of 0.80, while their xG against at home is higher at 1.38. The visitors are in decent overall form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches, but their extremely poor away numbers clearly point towards a Larissa victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal is PAOK II’s performance away from home: the team has yet to score, averaging 0.0 goals per match, with 100% of games ending without scoring. The visitors also create very few chances, averaging 0.80 xG, 4.0 shots and just 1.0 shot on target per match, while Larissa limit opponents to only 0.92 xG. Larissa should have a clear attacking advantage, as they score 1.5 goals per home match while PAOK II concede 2.0, but a one-sided home win would still fulfill the BTTS No scenario. The visitors’ last five matches were more goal-heavy, averaging 1.6 goals scored and BTTS in 80% of games, but these figures conflict with their very poor away numbers. With the league-wide BTTS average at 46%, it is more likely that at least one team—above all PAOK II—will fail to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Larissa has a clearer attacking potential at home: they score an average of 1.5 goals, while PAOK II concede 2.0 goals per away match. At the same time, the visitors have yet to score in their away data, generating just 0.8 xG and averaging only 1 shot on target, which limits their projection to 0.95 goals. The chance-quality estimates also point to a moderate total, with Larissa’s xG at 1.27 and the average xG against PAOK II at 1.38. In their last five matches, both teams conceded an average of 1.2 goals, but games with at least 4 goals have not occurred in either Larissa’s or PAOK II’s season results. With 2.30 expected goals, the strongest selection is Under 3.5, as a four-or-more-goal scenario would require a clear deviation from both teams’ current profile.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Larissa averages 1.5 goals at home and has not lost a single match, while PAOK II have collected 0 points away from home, failed to score, and concede an average of 2.0 goals. The hosts create significantly more chances: their average xG stands at 1.27 compared with the opponents’ 0.80, while their number of shots on target is 4.5 against just 1.0 for PAOK II. In previous matches under these conditions, Larissa led at the break in 50% of games and conceded no goals before half-time, whereas PAOK II were behind at half-time in 100% of their away fixtures. The visitors’ last five matches look better in terms of results, but Larissa’s first-half advantage remains clear: they average 0.6 goals scored before the break and concede only 0.2. The most likely scenario is therefore that the hosts take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle, making the HT/FT 1/1 outcome the most probable.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
LarissaPAOK II
11Shots4
LarissaPAOK II
6Shots on target0
LarissaPAOK II
1.4xG0.69
LarissaPAOK II
0Corners5
LarissaPAOK II
39Dangerous attacks59
LarissaPAOK II
20Fouls13
LarissaPAOK II
0Cards0
LarissaPAOK II

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game1
LarissaPAOK II
0.33Goals allowed / game1.33
LarissaPAOK II
50%Average possession54%
LarissaPAOK II
4.33Shots on target / game3.33
LarissaPAOK II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.33Shots per game7.67
LarissaPAOK II
4.33Shots on target3.33
LarissaPAOK II
17.6%Shot conversion13%
LarissaPAOK II
50%Possession54%
LarissaPAOK II
1.35xG for1.04
LarissaPAOK II
0.88xG against1.15
LarissaPAOK II

Shooting quality

Larissa: Efficient finishingPAOK II: Efficient finishing
LarissaPAOK II
Accuracy (shots on target)38%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Larissa is 75% better for: last-5 form.

2.33 pts / game - Larissa · 1.33 pts / game - PAOK II

Larissa
DWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
PAOK II
DLW
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 33%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Larissa is 100% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Larissa · 1 goals / game - PAOK II

Larissa is 303% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.33 goals / game - Larissa · 1.33 goals / game - PAOK II

Larissa scoring profile: very strong

Larissa scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while PAOK II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).

PAOK II scoring profile: mixed

PAOK II scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Larissa keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).

6Goals scored (season)3
LarissaPAOK II
1Goals conceded (season)4
LarissaPAOK II
2.33Average goals per game2.33
LarissaPAOK II
6Goals scored (last 5)3
LarissaPAOK II
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
LarissaPAOK II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal67%
LarissaPAOK II
33%2 goals33%
LarissaPAOK II
33%3 goals0%
LarissaPAOK II
33%4 goals0%
LarissaPAOK II

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
LarissaPAOK II
0%2 goals33%
LarissaPAOK II
0%3 goals0%
LarissaPAOK II
0%4 goals0%
LarissaPAOK II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LarissaPAOK II
33%Scored in both halves33%
LarissaPAOK II

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
LarissaPAOK II
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LarissaPAOK II
33%BTTS - last 567%
LarissaPAOK II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
LarissaPAOK II
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
LarissaPAOK II
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
LarissaPAOK II
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Larissa is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.33 pts / game - Larissa · 1.33 pts / game - PAOK II

Larissa - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing
PAOK II - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.33Points per game (1st half)1.33
LarissaPAOK II
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
LarissaPAOK II
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
LarissaPAOK II
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.67
LarissaPAOK II
100%Clean sheet before half-time67%
LarissaPAOK II
33%No goal before half-time67%
LarissaPAOK II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per game (2nd half)0.67
LarissaPAOK II
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
LarissaPAOK II
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1
LarissaPAOK II
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.67
LarissaPAOK II
67%Clean sheet after half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II
33%No goal after half-time33%
LarissaPAOK II

Larissa - second-half results

33% W67% D0% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PAOK II - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Larissa - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.331.67
Goals scored / game0.71.3
Goals allowed / game0.00.3
Average goals per game0.71.7
1 goal67%67%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
PAOK II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.330.67
Goals scored / game0.30.7
Goals allowed / game0.31.0
Average goals per game0.71.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%0%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Larissa
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

PAOK II
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Larissa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

PAOK II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).

Teams vs league

LarissaLigaPAOK II
Average goals per game• 2.332.25• 2.33
Both teams scored▼ 33%46%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%42%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 67%31%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%63%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time• 67%67%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.25
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / game
0.96
Away goals / game
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+41%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Michailakis Bousis⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LarissaGoalMichailakis Bousis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Larissa vs PAOK II?

The Super League 2 match finished Larissa 1:0 PAOK II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Larissa vs PAOK II?

Larissa score 2.00 goals per game on average and PAOK II 1.00. The Super League 2 average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Larissa's matches and 67% of PAOK II's.

What form are Larissa and PAOK II in?

Over the last 5 games Larissa have a 2-1-0 record (2.33 points per game) and PAOK II 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Larissa vs PAOK II?

The statistical background for Larissa vs PAOK II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.