Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Lausanne Sport is displaying decisively better form in the last five matches with a record of 3 wins and one draw (2.0 PPG), whereas Grasshopper has won only once and suffered four defeats (0.6 PPG). The hosts have a clear advantage in home matches with a 40% win rate and a positive goal difference (+3), while the visitors win just 20% of away games with a dismal balance of -10. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.82 vs 1.51 for the visitors), indicating superior quality in created chances. Grasshopper struggles defensively on the road, conceding an average of 2.1 goals per match and failing to keep a clean sheet in 90% of fixtures. Considering all these factors, Lausanne Sport has a realistic chance of securing three points, although the form of both teams suggests a draw as an alternative scenario.
Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Lausanne Sport played against Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on January 24, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Lausanne Sport has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Grasshopper has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Lausanne Sport scores 1.55 goals per game and allows 1.40. Grasshopper scores 1.35 and allows 1.90. Games in this league average 3.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Lausanne Sport's games and 60% of Grasshopper's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 60%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Lausanne Sport has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.48 per game. Lausanne Sport takes 14.4 shots per game, while Grasshopper takes 13.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Lausanne Sport leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.90 goals per game after halftime. Grasshopper leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
Lausanne Sport's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Grasshopper, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.27 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lausanne Sport is displaying decisively better form in the last five matches with a record of 3 wins and one draw (2.0 PPG), whereas Grasshopper has won only once and suffered four defeats (0.6 PPG). The hosts have a clear advantage in home matches with a 40% win rate and a positive goal difference (+3), while the visitors win just 20% of away games with a dismal balance of -10. xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.82 vs 1.51 for the visitors), indicating superior quality in created chances. Grasshopper struggles defensively on the road, conceding an average of 2.1 goals per match and failing to keep a clean sheet in 90% of fixtures. Considering all these factors, Lausanne Sport has a realistic chance of securing three points, although the form of both teams suggests a draw as an alternative scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Lausanne Sport | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lausanne Sport is 167% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Lausanne Sport · 0.6 pts / game - Grasshopper
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lausanne Sport is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
1.55 goals / game - Lausanne Sport · 1.35 goals / game - Grasshopper
Lausanne Sport is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.4 goals / game - Lausanne Sport · 1.9 goals / game - Grasshopper
Lausanne Sport scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 meczów).
Grasshopper scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while Lausanne Sport keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lausanne Sport
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lausanne Sport - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 20%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Lausanne Sport
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Lausanne Sport | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.95 | 3.27 | • 3.25 |
| Both teams scored | • 65% | 64% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 70% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 21% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 55% | 76% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 82% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Lausanne Sport's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Grasshopper. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Lausanne Sport 1:1 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper?
Lausanne Sport score 1.55 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.35. The Super League average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Lausanne Sport's matches and 60% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Lausanne Sport and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Lausanne Sport have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.