Leevon / PPK vs Mārupe: match statistics
Leevon / PPK vs Mārupe: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Leevon / PPK play Mārupe in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Leevon / PPK: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Mārupe: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Leevon / PPK scores 1.62 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Mārupe scores 1.69 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.43 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Leevon / PPK 69%, Mārupe 46%. Over 2.5: Leevon / PPK 69%, Mārupe 77%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Leevon / PPK has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.46. Leevon / PPK: 12.1 shots per match, Mārupe: 9.5.
Match halves
Leevon / PPK: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 1.08. Mārupe: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.31.
Goals by minute
Leevon / PPK: 46-60 (6 goals). Mārupe: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Liga: 3.43 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 0-1-1. Average goals 0.50, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Leevon/PPK carry clear momentum: 10 goals and a 4-1-0 record in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.6 points per game; this indicates high attacking efficiency and stability. Mārupe, top of the table, have 8 goals and 0 conceded for the season, and in the last 5 matches they registered 13 goals and 3 conceded, but also suffered 2 defeats in that span. Form comparison favors the home side — Leevon are unbeaten in their last 5 (4-1-0), while Mārupe are 3-0-2; this translates into a superior points average and match rhythm for the hosts (2.6 vs 1.8 points per game). Despite the visitors’ season-long defensive advantage (0 goals conceded vs 1 for the hosts), Leevon’s goal differential and consistency in recent matches make a home win the preferred pick.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Leevon / PPK | Mārupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Leevon / PPK is 133% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Leevon / PPK · 0.6 pts / match - Mārupe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Leevon / PPK is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.31 goals / match - Leevon / PPK · 1.46 goals / match - Mārupe
Leevon / PPK scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).
Mārupe scores in 77% of matches (10 of 13 matches), while Leevon / PPK keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Leevon / PPK
Over / Under — Mārupe
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mārupe is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / match - Leevon / PPK · 1.08 pts / match - Mārupe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Leevon / PPK - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Mārupe - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Leevon / PPK
Mārupe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Leevon / PPK | Liga | Mārupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.92 | 3.43 | ▼ 3.15 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 60% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 69% | 68% | ▲ 77% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 23% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 84% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Leevon / PPK 0 - 1 - 1 Mārupe. Average goals 0.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Leevon / PPK vs Mārupe?
The 1. Liga match finished Leevon / PPK 0:0 Mārupe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Leevon / PPK and Mārupe?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Leevon / PPK won 0, Mārupe won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Leevon / PPK vs Mārupe?
Leevon / PPK score 1.62 goals per game on average and Mārupe 1.69. The 1. Liga average is 3.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Leevon / PPK's matches and 46% of Mārupe's.
What form are Leevon / PPK and Mārupe in?
Over the last 5 games Leevon / PPK have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mārupe 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Leevon / PPK vs Mārupe?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Leevon / PPK vs Mārupe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.