Leevon / PPK vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics
Leevon / PPK vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Leevon / PPK played against Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on September 19, 2026. Final score: 6:3.
Recent form
Leevon / PPK has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Rīgas FS II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Leevon / PPK scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.15. Rīgas FS II scores 1.60 and allows 2.75. Games in this league average 3.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of Leevon / PPK's games and 70% of Rīgas FS II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 70% and 80%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Leevon / PPK has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.47 per game. Leevon / PPK takes 12.8 shots per game, while Rīgas FS II takes 10.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Leevon / PPK leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Leevon / PPK's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For Rīgas FS II, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.74 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Leevon / PPK are 4th in the standings and have won 13 of their 20 matches, while Rīgas FS II sit 10th, with 12 defeats over the same period. The hosts are in excellent form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 11 goals and conceding just 4, whereas the visitors have lost 4 of their last 5 games, conceding as many as 23 goals. At home, Leevon / PPK win 80% of their matches, average 2.20 goals and create chances worth 1.79 xG, while Rīgas FS II lose 67% of their away fixtures and concede an average of 3.22 goals. The hosts also hold the edge in attacking quality: they average 5.7 shots on target per match compared with their opponents’ 3.67, with a conversion rate of 17% versus 13%. The visitors fail to score in 44% of their away matches, making Leevon / PPK clear favorites.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Leevon / PPK have recorded BTTS in 82% of their matches this season, well above the league average of 65%, while Rīgas FS II have registered this outcome in 56% of games. The hosts score an average of 1.82 goals but concede 2.36, whereas the visitors score 1.33 goals and concede exceptionally many—3.22 per match. In each of Rīgas FS II’s last five appearances, both teams scored, with a record of 10 goals scored and 23 conceded. Leevon / PPK have been more solid defensively of late, conceding just 0.8 goals per match; however, the visitors’ attacking potential is supported by an xG of 1.52 across their last five matches. The strongest scenario remains BTTS - Yes: the hosts should exploit their opponents’ very weak defense, while the visitors possess sufficient attacking numbers to respond with at least one goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Leevon / PPK average 1.82 goals per game this season, raising that figure to 2.20 across their last five matches, with 11 goals scored in total. Rīgas FS II have a very weak defensive record at present: they have conceded 23 goals in their last five games, or as many as 4.60 per match, compared with a season average of 3.22. The 1.5 line has been exceeded in 100% of the home team’s matches and in 89% of the away team’s games, while the league-wide average stands at a high 3.73 goals. The hosts are further supported by 1.77 xG from their last five matches, while the visitors’ defense allowed an average of 2.14 xG during that period. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as even with Leevon / PPK showing a more solid defense recently, the scale of Rīgas FS II’s defensive problems clearly favors at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Leevon / PPK are in excellent form: they have won four and drawn one of their last five matches, while Rīgas FS II have suffered four defeats over the same period. The hosts were leading at the break in four of their last five games, scoring an average of 1.6 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.6, whereas the visitors failed to lead in any of those matches and conceded as many as 2.8 goals in the first halves. The hosts’ superiority is also evident across the season: they create chances worth an average of 1.59 xG compared with their opponents’ 1.35, while Rīgas FS II concede an average of 3.22 goals per match. The visitors remain vulnerable after the break, conceding an average of 1.8 goals in their last five matches, so the most likely scenario is Leevon / PPK leading at half-time and maintaining their winning advantage until full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Leevon / PPK | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Leevon / PPK is 333% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Leevon / PPK · 0.6 pts / game - Rīgas FS II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Leevon / PPK is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.8 goals / game - Leevon / PPK · 1.6 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
Leevon / PPK is 139% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.15 goals / game - Leevon / PPK · 2.75 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
Leevon / PPK scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 games), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 games).
Rīgas FS II scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Leevon / PPK keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Leevon / PPK
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Leevon / PPK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 25%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 3.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -10 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Leevon / PPK
Rīgas FS II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Leevon / PPK | Liga | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.95 | 3.74 | ▲ 4.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 65% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 70% | 71% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 19% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Leevon / PPKGoalGabriels Kirkils
- Rīgas FS IIAssistAleksejs Bukovskis
- Leevon / PPKGoalRoberts KrūmsAssist: Ričards Korzāns
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Leevon / PPK's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Rīgas FS II. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Leevon / PPK vs Rīgas FS II?
The 1. Liga match finished Leevon / PPK 6:3 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Leevon / PPK and Rīgas FS II?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Leevon / PPK won 1, Rīgas FS II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Leevon / PPK vs Rīgas FS II?
Leevon / PPK score 1.80 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.60. The 1. Liga average is 3.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Leevon / PPK's matches and 70% of Rīgas FS II's.
What form are Leevon / PPK and Rīgas FS II in?
Over the last 5 games Leevon / PPK have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Leevon / PPK vs Rīgas FS II?
The statistical background for Leevon / PPK vs Rīgas FS II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


