Leopards vs APS Bomet: match statistics
The Leopards present decidedly better form than APS Bomet, confirmed by a season record of 6 wins, 6 draws, and only 1 loss, accompanied by a positive goal difference of 14:9. The hosts' form in the last five matches is particularly impressive (3 wins, 2 draws, zero losses), along with an excellent home run featuring 50% wins and 50% clean sheets with an average of just 0.5 conceded goals per match. APS Bomet holds a weaker overall record (3-4-7) and a negative goal difference of 13:18, while their away form is unstable with just 33% wins and an average of 1.67 goals conceded per match. Possession advantage (50% vs 41%), superior xG efficiency (0.72 vs 0.79), and an impressive 2.2 points per match in the last five games give the Leopards a clear edge. Considering all statistics, a home victory is the most probable scenario for this encounter.
Leopards vs APS Bomet: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Leopards played against APS Bomet in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The game was played on January 17, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Leopards has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. APS Bomet has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Leopards scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 0.63. APS Bomet scores 1.00 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 1.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Leopards's games and 50% of APS Bomet's. The Over 2.5 rates are 31% and 38%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Leopards has the higher season xG average, 1.26 to 1.15 per game. Leopards takes 7.8 shots per game, while APS Bomet takes 6.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Leopards leads at halftime in 6% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. APS Bomet leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.19 after halftime.
When the teams score
Leopards's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (11 goals). For APS Bomet, it is minutes 0-15 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Kenyan Premier League games average 1.91 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The Leopards present decidedly better form than APS Bomet, confirmed by a season record of 6 wins, 6 draws, and only 1 loss, accompanied by a positive goal difference of 14:9. The hosts' form in the last five matches is particularly impressive (3 wins, 2 draws, zero losses), along with an excellent home run featuring 50% wins and 50% clean sheets with an average of just 0.5 conceded goals per match. APS Bomet holds a weaker overall record (3-4-7) and a negative goal difference of 13:18, while their away form is unstable with just 33% wins and an average of 1.67 goals conceded per match. Possession advantage (50% vs 41%), superior xG efficiency (0.72 vs 0.79), and an impressive 2.2 points per match in the last five games give the Leopards a clear edge. Considering all statistics, a home victory is the most probable scenario for this encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Leopards | APS Bomet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.49 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Leopards is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Leopards · 1 pts / game - APS Bomet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Leopards is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Leopards · 1 goals / game - APS Bomet
Leopards is 98% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.63 goals / game - Leopards · 1.25 goals / game - APS Bomet
Leopards scores in 69% of games (11 of 16 meczów), while APS Bomet keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 meczów).
APS Bomet scores in 56% of games (9 of 16 meczów), while Leopards keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Leopards
Over / Under - APS Bomet
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Leopards is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Leopards · 0.88 pts / game - APS Bomet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Leopards - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
APS Bomet - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Leopards
APS Bomet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Leopards | Liga | APS Bomet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.88 | 1.91 | ▲ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 31% | 30% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | • 31% | 32% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 38% | 34% | ▲ 38% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Leopards vs APS Bomet?
The Kenyan Premier League match finished Leopards 2:1 APS Bomet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Leopards vs APS Bomet?
Leopards score 1.25 goals per game on average and APS Bomet 1.00. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Leopards's matches and 50% of APS Bomet's.
What form are Leopards and APS Bomet in?
Over the last 5 games Leopards have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and APS Bomet 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Leopards vs APS Bomet?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.