United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of September 20, 2026

Lexington vs Phoenix Rising: match statistics

Lexington crest
Lexington
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Phoenix Rising crest
Phoenix Rising

Lexington vs Phoenix Rising: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Lexington played against Phoenix Rising in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on August 8, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Lexington has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Phoenix Rising has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Lexington scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.43. Phoenix Rising scores 1.44 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's games and 56% of Phoenix Rising's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 50%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Phoenix Rising has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.43 per game. Lexington takes 12.2 shots per game, while Phoenix Rising takes 12.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Lexington leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Phoenix Rising leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Lexington's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Phoenix Rising, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL Championship games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lexington has a clear home advantage profile: they win 56% of their home matches and score an average of 1.78 goals, while Phoenix Rising win just 22% of their away games and average 1.00 goal per match. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.56 compared with the visitors’ 1.07, and their advantage is also evident in shots on target per game: 4.56 to 2.56. Lexington’s home defense concedes an average of 1.33 goals, slightly fewer than Phoenix do away from home (1.44), while the hosts also keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches compared with 22% for their opponents. Recent form is not entirely one-sided, however, with Lexington collecting 7 points from five matches and Phoenix 5, although the hosts conceded as many as 10 goals during that period. Home advantage, a higher volume of chances created and Phoenix’s weaker away record all point towards a Lexington victory, although the draw remains a significant risk.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is more likely, as both teams have a season-long rate of matches with goals scored by both sides of 56%, slightly above the league average of 55%. The trend over the last five matches is even more favorable: Lexington recorded BTTS in 60% of games, while Phoenix Rising did so in as many as 80%, conceding an average of 2.0 and 1.6 goals respectively. Lexington creates a high volume of chances at home, averaging 1.93 xG, 16.44 shots, and 6.78 shots on target per match, while Phoenix keeps a clean sheet in only 22% of games. The visitors have been weaker over the course of the season, but their recent xG has risen to 1.63, while Lexington’s defense has allowed an average of 1.61 xG across its last five matches. The biggest risk to this pick is Phoenix’s away scoring average of just 1.0 goal; however, their current attacking form and the defensive issues on both sides provide stronger support for the BTTS - Yes outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Lexington creates significantly more chances: its average xG stands at 1.93, compared with the 1.37 xG conceded by Phoenix, while it also records 16.44 shots and 6.78 shots on target per match. Phoenix averages just 1.00 goal per game this season, but the hosts have conceded as many as 2.0 goals per match in their last five fixtures, with 1.61 xG allowed to opponents. At least two goals were scored in 89% of both teams’ matches, while over 2.5 goals landed in 60% of each team’s games across the last five rounds. The season-long percentage of matches finishing above 2.5 goals is 44% for both sides, making the 2.5 line more balanced than current form might suggest. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as Lexington’s solid attacking potential and both teams’ recent defensive weaknesses should produce at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Lexington win, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches. Across the season, Lexington led at the break in 33% of matches, compared with just 11% for Phoenix Rising, but the hosts are clearly stronger over the full 90 minutes: they average 1.67 goals from an xG of 1.93, while the visitors score 1.00 goals from an xG of 1.07. Lexington’s advantage is also evident in chance creation, averaging 16.44 shots and 6.78 on target, compared with Phoenix’s 8.78 shots and 2.56 on target. After the break, the hosts average 1.11 goals, while as many as 67% of Phoenix’s second halves have ended level, supporting a turnaround in favor of the home side after an evenly balanced opening.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Shots-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Shots on target-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0xG0
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Corners-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0Dangerous attacks0
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Fouls-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Cards-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.57Goals scored / game1.44
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.43Goals allowed / game1.5
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
51%Average possession50%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
4.36Shots on target / game4.75
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.21Shots per game12.38
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
4.36Shots on target4.75
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
12.9%Shot conversion11.6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
51%Possession50%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.43xG for1.49
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.34xG against1.31
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Shooting quality

Lexington: BalancedPhoenix Rising: Balanced
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lexington is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Lexington · 0.8 pts / game - Phoenix Rising

Lexington
LWWWL
Season result split
36% W21% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Phoenix Rising
LDLLW
Season result split
31% W31% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-6
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lexington is 9% better for: goals scored per game.

1.57 goals / game - Lexington · 1.44 goals / game - Phoenix Rising

Lexington is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.43 goals / game - Lexington · 1.5 goals / game - Phoenix Rising

Lexington scoring profile: very strong

Lexington scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 games), while Phoenix Rising keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 games).

Phoenix Rising scoring profile: very strong

Phoenix Rising scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 games), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 games).

22Goals scored (season)23
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
20Goals conceded (season)24
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
3Average goals per game2.94
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
12Goals scored (last 5)8
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
9Goals conceded (last 5)12
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal81%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
36%2 goals38%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
29%3 goals25%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
14%4 goals0%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal75%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
43%2 goals50%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
21%3 goals19%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
7%4 goals6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time13%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0%BTTS in both halves6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
21%Scored in both halves19%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
80%BTTS - last 580%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lexington is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / game - Lexington · 1.19 pts / game - Phoenix Rising

Lexington - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing
Phoenix Rising - half-time state
25% leading44% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per game (1st half)1.19
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.44
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.13
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
64%Clean sheet before half-time56%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
57%No goal before half-time63%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per game (2nd half)1.5
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.81
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
36%Clean sheet after half-time50%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
43%No goal after half-time38%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Lexington - second-half results

21% W43% D36% L
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Phoenix Rising - second-half results

38% W38% D25% L
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Lexington - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game1.01.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Phoenix Rising - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.42.0
Average goals per game0.83.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
6
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Phoenix Rising
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Phoenix Rising

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

LexingtonLigaPhoenix Rising
Average goals per game 3.002.79 2.94
Both teams scored 64%58% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%52% 50%
Clean sheets 29%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 71%67% 69%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.25
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Phoenix RisingYellow cardJohn Scearce
  2. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Tarik ScottOff: Elio Nicolas Firmino
  3. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Macielo TschantretOff: Blaine Ferri
  4. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Joseph HaffertyOff: Jacob Greene
  5. Phoenix RisingSubstitutionOn: Gunnar StudenthofftOff: Jean Eric Moursou
  6. Phoenix RisingRed cardLuke Biasi
  7. LexingtonYellow cardAaron Molloy

Head-to-head

Record from Lexington's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Phoenix Rising. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Lexington SC
2 : 0
Phoenix Rising FC
Phoenix Rising FC
0 : 1
Lexington SC

FAQ

What was the result of Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

The USL Championship match finished Lexington 1:0 Phoenix Rising. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lexington and Phoenix Rising?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Lexington won 2, Phoenix Rising won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

Lexington score 1.57 goals per game on average and Phoenix Rising 1.44. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's matches and 56% of Phoenix Rising's.

What form are Lexington and Phoenix Rising in?

Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Phoenix Rising 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

The statistical background for Lexington vs Phoenix Rising — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.